Preview

Charles Sumner's Speech Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
163 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Charles Sumner's Speech Analysis
Charles Sumner the senator of Massachussetts in 1856 gave a speech on May 20th titled, “ The Crime Against Kansas.” This speech “attacked Southerners for forcing slavery on the territory.” Sumner coming from the anti-slavery state of Massachussetts believed that slavery was wrong and that the south should get rid of it. While trying to make his point Charles Sumner called out the Senator of South Carolina, Andrew Butler and made bold insults directed towards him. Two days after Charles Sumner’s speech Andrew Butler’s nephew Preston Brooks “approached Sumner at his senate desk and beat him with his cane.” After the attack Sumner was badly injured and wasn’t able to return to his full health. People in the south were supportive of Brooks’ actions.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Analyzing Patrick Henry's Speech From 1775 To Freedom
    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Analyzing Patrick Henry's Speech From 1775 To Freedom

    Patrick Henry gave a speech in 1775 to the Virginia Convention that convinced them to take action and fight back against Great Britain for their freedom because their methods of hope and petition failed to work. First, he used concession to opposition in the beginning of his speech to acknowledge the arguments and thoughts of the preceding speakers so that he could speak freely while he suggested treason. Secondly, he pointed out how despite the obvious facts of the start of a war, the convention continued to hope even without response from Britain. Henry stated, “Ask yourselves how this gracious reception of our petition comports with these war-like preparations which cover our waters and darken our land" (Henry). In addition, Henry contradicted…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis Of Fdr's Speech
    • 144 Words
    • 1 Page

    Rhetorical Analysis Of Fdr's Speech

    Recenctly I read Franklin d. Roosevelt's FourFreedoms Speech. In the speech FDR talks about nazi germany and how they threaten our way of life and if we dont help fight for our four freedoms they will be taken awa. At the time Nazi Germany was Taking over and attacking countries in europe and killing ruthlessly. FDR wanted to awaken the sleeping giant, the American millitary, and he wanted to spur the us to support europe in the war. in this speech FDR uses facts and reality and doesnt use fantasy or anything fiction related.…

    • 144 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Benjamin Franklin Rhetorical Analysis
    • 228 Words
    • 1 Page

    Benjamin Franklin Rhetorical Analysis

    The essay that Ben Franklin writes is rather compelling. He actually takes his time to observe the Native Americans rather than judging them harshly. He makes very clear and wise observations on their lifestyle. However, which isn’t so different from there’s. He does notice that they council each other differently from the European society. He sees that they give each other respect by taking time to understand what one another is saying, and collectively correcting each other. When you Franklin compares his council and how they all talk over one another voicing their opinions. Moreover, what Franklin means by savages is that by his examination that simply both the Europeans and Natives consider both their cultures to be civil. Franklin writes,…

    • 228 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Eisenhower Rhetorical Analysis
    • 5242 Words
    • 21 Pages

    Eisenhower Rhetorical Analysis

    In bygone days, commanders were taught that when in doubt, they should march their troops towards the sound of gunfire. I intend to march my troops towards the sound of gunfire.[->0]”…

    • 5242 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Overview of Dred Scott's Case
    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Overview of Dred Scott's Case

    The majority opinion stated that because of Dred Scott’s race he was not a citizen and had no right to sue under the Constitution, in March of 1857. Stretching beyond the case of the moment, the court’s decision also invalidated the Missouri Compromise of 1820 that had for nearly 40 years placed restrictions on slavery north of the parallel 36 degrees, 30 minutes, in the vast territory of the Louisiana Purchase. Scott’s abolitionist lawyers might have hoped for a landmark decision but not the one they got. The Supreme Court’s ruling galvanized the abolition movement and spurred Abraham Lincoln to publicly speak out against it, the event that led to the resurgence of his personal political career.…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Lincoln's Second Address Rhetorical Analysis
    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Lincoln's Second Address Rhetorical Analysis

    During Lincoln’s second address, people were shocked about how short and concise his speech was. Instead of addressing slavery, states’ rights, and politics, he offered his view on the future of the nation. In his address, Lincoln used rhetorical strategies such as syntax, diction, and pathos to inform his citizens that he has a better vision for the future of the nation.…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Preston Brooks: The Big Stick Diplomacy
    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Preston Brooks: The Big Stick Diplomacy

    Brooks was born in South Carolina in 1819 and went to the South Carolina College in 1839, which is known as the University of South Carolina today. Despite his excellent grades, he faced many difficulties at school, from terrible attendance to his infamous duels. Eventually, he was expelled and never graduated from college (Puleo). He had attended law school and became involved with the Mexican War. In fact, he served as a captain in the Palmetto Regiment, establishing his role within United States history briefly (Gienapp). In 1853, he was elected as a representative in the House of Representatives. Less known was his brother, John Hampden Brooks, who entirely supported Preston Brooks’s decision in beating Charles Sumner. Later, through letters, John expressed his glee and his wholehearted support for his brother. Yet, in reality, the incident faced much more controversy nationwide. On May 22, 1856, Brooks briskly strode into the Senate chamber and began to beat Senator Charles Sumner violently with his cane (“Commentary on 1856”). As a Democrat, his views were mainly for slavery, typical of the time. To his credit, Brooks was known as a very moderate Democrat, one willing to compromise often with the other side and stressed the need for cooperation. Newspapers had attributed characteristics like being “considerate and kind” to Brooks’s character (Puleo). But…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Charles Sumner: Active American Individuals Between 1830 And 1860
    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Charles Sumner: Active American Individuals Between 1830 And 1860

    Having many enemies because of his views and after recovering from the cane beating, the Massachusetts General Court re-elected him in November 1856. They thought that his unoccupied chair in the Senate chamber served as a powerful symbol of free speech and resistance to slavery. He made quite a few speeches about slavery, including one he delivered in the months leading up to the 1860 presidential election, called "The Barbarism of Slavery." His father hated slavery and told Sumner that freeing the slaves would "do us no good" except if they were treated equally by society. With this in mind, Sumner thought that moral law and laws that made a man unable to become a greater person — like slavery or segregation — were evil. Many events made Sumner take an active role in the anti-slavery movement, including the annexation of Texas — a new slave-holding state — in…

    • 594 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    John Lewis Speech Rhetorical Analysis
    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages

    John Lewis Speech Rhetorical Analysis

    John Lewis introduces pathos into his speech when he is describing the violent methods of the government against blacks. For example, Lewis vividly describes the notorious actions of the government when saying, “What did the federal government do when local police officials kicked and assaulted the pregnant wife of Slater King, and she lost her baby?” (para. 6). In this statement, Lewis shows how the government has failed to keep black people safe and continue to harm them, and that these people harmed can not recover from the pain they have received. Lewis utilizes pathos in order to gain the audience's support, to gain their sympathy and perhaps make the event sound more gruesome than it actually was, which nonetheless was an inhumane act…

    • 605 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical Analysis Of The Great Society Speech
    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Rhetorical Analysis Of The Great Society Speech

    Lyndon B. Johnson, the 36th president of the United States (1963-69). A moderate Democrat and vigorous leader in the United States Senate. His speech on “The Great Society” was for a change and for the well of the U.S in which he quoted, “The purpose of protecting the life of our nation and preserving the liberty of our citizens is to pursue the happiness of our people. Our success in that pursuit is the test of our success as a nation”. He believed and said in his speech that the Great Society rests on abundance and liberty for all. The audience was the main reason for this speech, people of that time were in division of races and this speech mostly concentrated and demanded to end poverty and racial injustice, to which they were totally committed in that time. This Great Society, Johnson proclaims, is no finished work but a challenge constantly renewed, indicating us toward a destiny where…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Stuart Greene's Arguments As Conversations
    • 224 Words
    • 1 Page

    Stuart Greene's Arguments As Conversations

    The audience in “Arguments as Conversations: The Role of Inquiry on Writing a Researched Argument” by Stuart Greene is the students. He gives hints (for example: "your teacher, " academic setting") in the firsts paragraphs that it is intended to the students. Greene's argument is for students to have sufficient evidence so that your paper can be effective. He believes that an argument is like a conversation as he stated “argument entails providing good reasons to support your viewpoint, as well as counterarguments, and recognizing how and why readers might object to your ideas”. In other words you have to provide proof so you can back up your statement. Stuart Greene purpose is to describe an argument and how to do a research argument. He suggests…

    • 224 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Stuart Green Argument As Conversation Analysis
    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Stuart Green Argument As Conversation Analysis

    The author, Stuart Green, makes a few interesting points in the text, Argument as Conversation: The Role of Inquiry in Writing a Researched Argument. Stuart Green described arguments as conversations. They contain an issue and many viewpoints on the specified situation of the issue. He mentioned the conversations we have are never new; they’ve been discussed before and they will be discussed after you leave the conversation. Also, you, as a reader, need to find out about the ideas said about your specific conversation in the past in order for you to branch out your own idea about the conversation. Stuart Green discussed about framing. He defined framing as “a metaphor for describing the lens, or perspective, from which writers present their…

    • 492 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Role Of Reconstruction In William Shakespeare's Hamlet
    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Role Of Reconstruction In William Shakespeare's Hamlet

    By electing me as president, the people chose for power to be exercised with principle. The Senator is right in one assertion, that I do wish to reunite the North and the South, but not at the sacrifice of social change. However, one must understand social change cannot be forced upon the South like it is some conquered foreign nation; such oppression was after all, the very reason they seceded in the first place and by humiliating them as Mr. Sumner so desires, will only birth another horrid…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Franklin D Roosevelt Speech Analysis
    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Franklin D Roosevelt Speech Analysis

    President Franklin D. Roosevelt and his New Deal program changed the course of American history greatly. The New Deal was associated with a number of economic programs and initiatives implemented in the country during the presidency of Roosevelt contributing to the country’s economic prosperity and stability, as well as greater confidence and security on the part of American citizens. President Roosevelt did not only promote but also re-defined the meaning of economic freedom over the course of the New Deal stating that the governments promoting economic inequality and poverty also promoted oppression and distarothip giving no hope for the future prosperity and social stability. Roosevelt…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Crisis of the Union DBQ
    • 345 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Crisis of the Union DBQ

    In the decade prior to the Civil War, it can be firmly stated that the war became inevitable because sectional difference grew beyond the capacity for compromise. Many events took place that supported this statement, one of which is the Compromise of 1850, which conceded to both the North and the South. Terms of the compromise include the inclusion of California as a free state, the division of the remaining Mexican concession into New Mexico and Utah, allowing state government to decide slavery status in the aforementioned states, eliminating slave trade in Washington, D.C., and passing a fugitive slaw law. The law would later be called "a statute which enacts the crime of kidnapping (Document B)."Preston S. Brooks, who did not hesitate to strike Charles Sumner in the Senate chamber, is depicted in Document F's Southern Chivalry. The portrayal clearly lays out the extent of passion when it came to the issue of slavery between the North and the South.…

    • 345 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics