Preview

Charles J Antonucci Case

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3708 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Charles J Antonucci Case
This paper focuses on the actions of Charles J. Antonucci, Sr., who contributed greatly to the failing of The Park Avenue Bank in New York. Unless otherwise noted, the facts of this case were learned in whole and in part from the complaint filed against Antonucci by Ricardo Velez, the Director of the Criminal Investigations Bureau of the New York State Banking Department.
The Park Avenue Bank, so named because its headquarters were located at 460 Park Avenue in New York City, was founded in 1987. In 2004, the Bank underwent a recapitalization and restructuring that resulted in a change of management. It was at this time that Charles J. Antonucci, Sr., became the president and CEO of the Park Avenue Bank. He also assumed a place on the Bank’s Board of Directors. Antonucci was responsible for organizing a group of investors that invested more than $10 million into the Park Avenue Bank in 2004, which had four retail branches in the Manhattan and Brooklyn areas of New York City, and he apparently impressed those investors with his previous work in turning around troubled banks (Wei and Bray).
In addition to holding CEO, president, and board positions for the Park Avenue Bank, Antonucci was also involved in a number of other businesses. Antonucci was also the 100% owner of Bedford Consulting Group, Inc., Easy
…show more content…
The Bank subsequently withdrew its application, later indicating in a press release that the withdrawal was completely voluntary due to the Bank’s change of opinion regarding TARP funds. Antonucci is quoted in multiple sources as having said, “I don’t need TARP money, I don’t necessarily want TARP money, we are a strong bank, and management is committed to putting capital in as it is

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The action of the police officers were completely wrong, both legally and morally. The officers violated Antonio Richard Rochin’s 4th, 14th and 5th Amendment rights. The officers never obtained a warrant to enter and search Rochin’s residence; therefore, making any evidence discovered inadmissible in court. In addition they violated Rochin’s 4th Amendment rights, and no one should have their home broken into by those who’s jobs are supposed to protect us based on some hearsay evidence. It would be understandable if these officers had enough evidence to create probable cause to create enough reasonable suspicion to get a warrant before searching Rochin’s house. Instead the officers chose to take the law into their own hands by “jumping…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Issue: Did the statute of limitations begin to run when the defendant first suspected harm had resulted from the product or when her suspicions were validated by a medical…

    • 547 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Professional auditing standards discuss the three key “conditions” that are typically present when a financial fraud occurs and identify a lengthy list of “fraud risk factors.” Briefly explain the difference between a fraud “condition” and a “fraud risk factors,” and provide examples of each. What fraud conditions and fraud risk factors were apparently present in the Madoff case?…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Indeed, the PBS documentary titled, “The Untouchables” clearly validated the fact that the criminal justice system stance against large corporations seemed too lenient despite the reckless activities these institutions pioneered to destabilize the global economy. Furthermore, Lanny Breuer, the Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division of the U.S. Department of Justice, during his interview with the PBS Frontline producer, remained all the time defensive even when presented with the facts implicating the powerful American banks about promoting wrongdoings. Paradoxically, Breuer in his defense kept arguing that his investigation could not find sufficient evidence to indict the financial institutions.…

    • 99 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the beginning years of the new century a series of huge corporate frauds predominated the business sections and front pages of dominant newspapers, shaking public confidence in the integrity of corporate America. Those scandals also raise serious questions about the integrity, acuity and prudence of business leaders and accountants who structure and document business transactions, approve required financial disclosures, and, in the case of accountants, certify the accuracy of required reports (Enrione, Mazza, & Zerboni, 2006).…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The entire purpose of this documentary The Untouchables was to seek an answer to an abbreviated question: why has no Wall Street executive been criminally prosecuted for fraud tied to the sale of mortgages. But the unabbreviated question and the one that infuriates us as Americans is: why has no executive of a major Wall Street firm been criminally prosecuted for anything. Containing interviews with top prosecutors of the DOJ, government officials and industry whistleblowers, Frontline reports allegations that Wall Street bankers ignored pervasive fraud when buying pools of mortgage loans. Tom Leonard, a supervisor who examined the quality of loans for major investment banks like Bear Stearns, said bankers instructed him to disregard clear evidence of fraud. “Fraud was the F-word, or the F-bomb. You didn’t use that word,” says Leonard. “By your terms and my terms, yes, it was fraud. By the industry's terms, it was something else.” Hearing these statements infuriated me more for Leonard was trying to even inform his supervisors of what was going on what some points but they continued to ignore this as well. All the bankers were interested in was profit and money; this is a clear enough view for criminal intent, which the DOJ had been having trouble proving this without a reasonable doubt. If the U.S. Justice Department was serious about doing its job, it has a cornucopia of crimes to pick from: Wall Street CEOs and CFOs attesting to fraudulent financial filings with the SEC, money laundering, lying in prospectuses, illegal foreclosures, rigging the Libor interest rate benchmark and then selling interest rate swaps based on a rigged index to school districts, cities and counties across America, manipulating the futures market with a rigged Libor interest rate, and so forth. From this documentary alone it strikes me as odd that not a single Wall Street CEO or CFO is sitting behind bars serving time for any of these crimes that are so blatantly obvious. The closes…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The bank affected the rights of the Sates in a subversive way. It gave up, surrendered the right of the States to tax the banking institutions. Under the operation of this act resident stockholders and citizens would be…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    toward the Bank of the United giving too much power to the unconstitutional and creating…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Charles Katz Case

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Charles Katz v. United States 1967 is a United States Supreme Court case that examined the nature of illegal search and seizure and the right to privacy. This case was argued on October 17, 1967 until its decision date of December 18, 1967. The case was argued under some pretty influential justices; those that include Chief Justice Earl Warren and Thurgood “Mr. Civil Rights” Marshall although he did not vote. This case overturned the previous ruling of Olmstead v. United States back in 1927. This case set a very high precedent in the realms of privacy and immaterial intrusion with technology as a search because phone calls and private phones were becoming part of everyday life. Now the facts of the case are very laid out and clear. Charles…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas P. Doyle Case

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Thomas P. Doyle is a Dominican priest. He was born in Wisconsin 1944 and grew up in upstate New York and Canada. By 1971 he worked as an assistant pastor at St. Vincent Ferrer parish in Chicago. He helped parishioners go through annulments by the Codes of Canon Law. He didn’t receive formal education in canonical law so he took a course in church jurisprudence in Rome 1973. In 1978, Doyle finished his courses in canon law and in 1981 he was given an invitation for an interview to be a canon lawyer in Washington D.C. In 1984, a Louisiana priest was charged for pedophilia who admitted to having sex with thirty-seven boys. Doyle learned of this case and many more from a psychiatrist priest who worked with troubled priests. He started to research…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    RICO Act

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “On November 10, 2009, four creditors of a Miami, Florida, law firm of seventy attorneys, Rothstein, Rosenfeldt and Adler P.A. (“RRA”), petitioned the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Florida to reorganize the law firm under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. Two weeks later, the Bankruptcy Court appointed Herbert Stettin trustee of the bankruptcy estate (the “Trustee”). On December 1, 2009, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida filed a five-count information charging Scott Rothstein, “a shareholder, Chairman and CEO of RRA,” with conspiring to violate the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (“RICO”), 18 U.S.C. § 1962(c), by employing RRA to engage in a pattern of racketeering activity, principally mail and wire fraud and money laundering, and with conspiring to commit those substantive offenses” 717 F.3d 1205, 1206-07 (11th Cir.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Story of Suicide Sal We each of us have a good "alibi" For being down here in the "joint"; But few of them really are justified…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This case study is about the management and leadership methods of the vice president of a middle market investment bank, Hudson Smith Gordon and how these methods affected the employees of this firm working directly with the VP.…

    • 2264 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Barings Bank

    • 849 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Barings collapse confirmed that internal controls at Barings were clearly insufficient to detect what was taking place with Leeson’s derivatives trades. “Look at what happened to Baring Brothers Bank when they turned loose that idiot, Nick Leeson, to do his own thing in the Far East financial markets. He lost so much money speculating in yen that he brought down the whole bank before the top command even knew what was happening.” (William Mcdonald Wallace, 1998) While initial accounts cantered on the fraudulent activities of Leeson, and evidence suggests that Leeson was in fact engaged in highly speculative transactions and deliberately tried to deceive his superiors, his actions were not the only reason for the group's failure. Totally inadequate internal communications, controls, and channels of accountability, as well as insufficient regulatory oversight, compounded these findings by UK regulators as did a lack of communication between regulators in the United Kingdom, Japan, and Singapore.…

    • 849 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although it was not evident to anyone watching, former Bank of America President Alex Pierce was furious. He had just been fired after 30 years of dedicated services to the bank. He knew the building better than anyone and could navigate his way anywhere in it while blindfolded.…

    • 965 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays