Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

Chamberlain was an Idiot - Discuss

Better Essays
1193 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Chamberlain was an Idiot - Discuss
History Homework
Neville Chamberlain was an idiot. discuss.
Neville Chamberlain was Prime Minister of Britain from 28 May 1937-10 May 1940. He is famous for using his appeasement foreign policy against Adolf Hitler. His actions today are widely criticized for allowing Hitler to grow more powerful, the most famous example being the Munich Agreement of 1938 in which Hitler not only took over the agreed Sudetenland but went on to take over the rest of Czechoslovakia.
One hand Neville Chamberlain was a responsible Prime Minister. Britain’s economy was still crippled due to the First World War. Britain was in no position to be involved in a war, and so Chamberlain did as much as he could to keep war from breaking out in Europe. The biggest threat to European peace at the time was Adolf Hitler, Chancellor of Germany. Adolf Hitler rose to power in the early 1930’s mainly due to his promise that he would destroy the Treaty of Versailles. Hitler’s first step was to remilitarize the Rhineland, an area of Germany that according to The Treaty of Versailles, was to be demilitarized to act as a buffer zone between Germany and France.
Chamberlain turned a blind eye to Hitler’s move, as it was not in Britain’s interests to go to war with Germany over the reoccupation of Hitler’s own country. There was already growing sympathy in Britain for Germany, the vast majority of the general public started to believe that the Treaty of Versailles was too harsh on Germany. Many people admired Hitler, he was named as “Man of the Year” in the American Magazine “Time”. It was famously quoted that, “Hitler is walking into his own back yard”. Hitler had taken a risk and it had paid off. Hitler wasn’t ready for war, but to his favour, the Allies ignored his move. This is the first example of Chamberlain applying his appeasement policy to Adolf Hitler. It was based on giving Hitler what was reasonable and then when those demands were satisfied, they would stop.
France on the other hand was very worried about the remilitarized Rhineland. The Treaty of Versailles made sure the land was demilitarized to protect France from another possible German attack. Despite having built many fortresses along the border between France and Germany, France was worried that this would lead onto the eventual invasion of France by Germany, (which it did in May 1940). France like Britain also had been crippled by the First World War, and was in no position to go to war. However France couldn’t take action against Germany without Britain’s support.
Chamberlain was determined to keep peace, even if it meant France was slightly more prone to attack from Germany, he needed to make sure that a full scale war with Germany was out of the question, (for now).
Another section of the Treaty of Versailles prohibited the unification of Austria with Germany. Austria had a lot of political instability at the time. There was also increased amounts of riots, crime and demonstrations, mostly stirred up by the Austrian Nazi party. In 1938 the Austrian army invited the German army into Austria to keep order. The German army were greeted with cheers and celebrations in the streets. The German army never left. A plebiscite was held shortly afterwards to vote on the Anschluss of Austria and Germany. The outcome was 99.75%, (it is widely believed today that this election was rigged by the Austrian Nazi Party). Austria was then annexed into Germany under the territory of “Ostmark”. The Anschluss was complete. Hitler did not face any opposition to the Anschluss, despite it breaking the Treaty of Versailles.
Chamberlain did not want to get involved as Hitler argued he was using the principle of self-determination as an excuse for the Anschluss. Self-determination was mentioned in the Treaty of Versailles and was a founding principle of the League of Nations. Hitler was uniting two German speaking countries together, and Chamberlain could not intervene as technically the German army was “invited in”, and then a formal vote was held. Hitler’s demands appeared reasonable at the time, although in hindsight these demands should never have been allowed. Chamberlain once again used appeasement to let Hitler get what he wanted to keep peace in Europe. He was letting Hitler grow stronger and not setting a limit. Each time Hitler got what he wanted, he kept pushing for more.
In 1938 Hitler had talks with the PM of Czechoslovakia about annexing the Sudetenland, an area of land in Czechoslovakia that was predominantly German speaking. When the Czech PM refused, Hitler threatened war. This lead to the Munich Conference of 1938, where Hitler and Chamberlain discussed the fate of the Sudetenland. Ironically, the Czech PM wasn’t even there, despite the fact that Chamberlain and Hitler were discussing the future of his own country. Hitler once again argued that German-speakers were living in the Sudetenland that should be part of Germany. Hitler then went on to say he wouldn’t ask for any more land after this. Chamberlain agreed and the Munich Agreement was signed.
Neville Chamberlain came back to Britain a hero, waving a piece of white paper, and saying that peace has been secured for Britain and for Europe. Behind the scenes, he didn’t trust Hitler, and was quietly readying the armed forces for war.
Hitler went on to take the Sudetenland, where the German army were treated as heroes, but then went on to take the rest of Czechoslovakia as well, betraying his word.

After this point, Hitler was readying for WWII. Chamberlain had let him grow too powerful, and soon the Nazi-Soviet Pact was signed, ensuring the death of Poland. On September 1st 1939 Hitler invaded western Poland. Shortly afterwards, the Soviet Union also invaded on the East side, and WWII had started.

In some ways Neville Chamberlain was an idiot. He did not draw a line to the extent of Hitler’s demands, and in doing so made himself and the other allies look weak compared to Germany and her demands. Chamberlain let Hitler strengthen Germany, in the hope that Germany would be an important trading partner. Instead strengthening Germany lead to WWII. Chamberlain could have stopped Hitler when he remilitarized the Rhineland, which could have put a firm stop to Hitler’s campaign.
However, it must be remembered that everything that Chamberlain did was in Britain’s best interests. Britain was not ready for war, and Chamberlain did not want another world war, which he thought might lead to the end of civilization. Chamberlain used appeasement to keep peace in Europe. It was the easiest policy to please everyone and keep peace, but he did set a limit to Germany’s demands and in the end the policy backfired.
Chamberlain wasn’t an idiot. He knew what was going on behind the scenes, and he didn’t trust Hitler. He couldn’t go to war with Germany at the time, as he was still rebuilding the armed forces. However, Chamberlain should have done something when Hitler took the rest of Czechoslovakia. In my opinion this was the perfect time to intervene and stop the German warmongering.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chamberlain suggested appeasement in hopes of keeping peace and avoiding war. He wanted to avoid war for as long as possible and keep the Europe out of war unless a bigger reason arose.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    After World War One the German government was left in shambles. With not knowing what to do the people turn to a man they didn't fully understand. He claimed that he would make Germany great and told people what they wanted to hear. Now that he was in charge it would lead to the Second World War and millions of lives lost. This mans name is Hitler. He put the world chaos in the 40s.…

    • 75 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    At the end of World War I, there were numerous fearful and terrible damages that happened in the world. The Allies shifted responsibilities to the Central Powers, especially to Germany. As a result, countries, such as the Ottoman Empire and the Austrian-Hungarian Empire were divided into a couple of small countries. Meanwhile, Germany needed a leader who would tide them over the crisis; and there was a leader, whose name was Hitler. As a military man, Adolf Hitler was fatigued by the debt that had to be paid for all the compensation from World War I. One of the reasons why Hitler planned to start another war was that he could not pay all of the debt back and make proper compensation for World War I. However, Europeans and Americans ignored the threats of Germany as none of their business, and then World War II became the world’s business. There was a plethora of “war guilt” during World War II, for example, persecution of the Jews caused the war to be more painful. World War II is the most important event in history because it brought many results into the world; for example, World War II proved to be the most costly war in history, the number of deaths and amount of money lost during the war transformed the political, social, and economic situations in Europe, the world divided into two “super powers”, and one of the visible results of World War II was the creation of the United Nations.…

    • 1419 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chamberlain didn't retire. He learned to deal with the intensity, bulking up his muscles to withstand the shoving, elbowing and body checks. He went on a strict diet cutting out all junk foods and started doing extra training sessions including weights and sprints to bulk up.On March 2, 1962, Chamberlain set a record that has not been broken. Playing against the New York Knicks in Hershey, he scored 100 points in four quarters. The Warriors won the game 169-147. He got 28 of 32 free throws, despite his record of .506 percent from his free throws that season. His athletic ability really helped him to dominate the game. He scored 36 shots of the 63 he took during the game.…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Chamberlain's Influence

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Brigadier General Joshua Lawrence Chamberlain was a college professor, Governor of Maine, and a Civil War hero in the battle of Gettysburg, Chamberlain impacted local, state, and national levels of the United States, most notably at the Battle of Gettysburg. Chamberlain was born in Brewer, Maine on September 8th 1828 (“Joshua Chamberlain” 1 ). His parents were Joshua and Sarah Bratow Chamberlain (“Joshua Chamberlain” 1). He was the first of five siblings, his brother Thomas also served in the Civil War. His mother instilled a sense of religion, while his father taught, influenced his taste in military. When he was in his twenties, Chamberlain worked in the brickyard and the timber industry before setting his sights towards teaching. He studied…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    German Aggression Dbq

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages

    He also points out that his policy served to repair the damage caused by the Treaty of Versailles. Chamberlain further states: “Really I have no need to defend my visits to Germany last autumn, for what was the alternative? Nothing that we could have done, nothing that France could have done, or Russia could have done could possibly have saved Czecho-Slovakia from invasion and destruction.” There existed no other solution to German aggression against Czechoslovakia. With the Munich Agreement signed, Germany invaded Czechoslovakia. On the other hand, without an Agreement, it still would have been likely that Germany invaded Czechoslovakia. Thus, Chamberlain remains blameless for German aggression because the German Empire would have invaded Czechoslovakia in either case. After establishing his innocence, Chamberlain states the inevitability of war against the German Empire: “Does not the question inevitably arise in our minds, if it is so easy to discover good reasons for ignoring assurances so solemnly and so repeatedly given, what reliance can be placed upon any other assurances that come from the same source?” How can any of the European powers trust the German Empire after the Munich Agreement was so abruptly ripped up? Any further peace talks will not produce satisfying results because there will always be doubt regarding the German intent to expand its territory. Chamberlain…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Concurrently, in the period following World War I, tensions were yet again rising in Europe. Global economies were beginning to destabilize as dictatorial regimes rose to power in Europe and Asia, setting the stage for World War II. Specifically, the rise of Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party in Germany was a topic of concern to the Allies (Ellis, 12). Capitalizing on economic instability, social unrest, and national humiliation resulting from the Treaty of Versailles, Hitler and the Nazi Party exploited widespread discontent to gain popular support. Through propaganda, political maneuvering, and intimidation, Hitler was appointed Chancellor of Germany in 1933.…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Intimidation from Fascist leaders was a factor that led to the illogical events of World War II. Adolf Hitler, chancellor of Germany, justified his barbaric actions on his attempt to benefit the "superior" German race. The effects of his ambitions were displayed during the Munich Conference in 1938. Hitler invited the Prime Minister of Britain and the Premier of France and demanded that the Sudetenland become part of Germany. Due to France and Britain's fear of another war, Hitler's demand was accepted. The appeasement, or agreement in order to maintain peace, at the Munich Conference was said to have "saved Europe from a world war," as stated by William Shirer. Contrary to Shirer, Europe would still be involved in war and things would only get worse.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Munich agreement encouraged Hitler to take more land and spread militarism. Neville Chamberlain should have stopped Hitler in his tracks, and gathered Allies to defend Poland, as well…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He was a man that stood up to what he believed in and filled up to the duties that called to him. Neville Chamberlain loved what he did and wouldn’t change his duties for nothing in the world. Neville Chamberlain would fight for his peace against any county even the strongest country. Neville Chamberlain lived up to his mother’s and father’s dream and went even bigger than his parents would ever imagine. Neville Chamberlain ended up being in people’s opinion, one of the greatest prime ministers that came through Britain and one of the most popular mayors that has ever come through Birmingham, England. Neville Chamberlain wanted to be the best man that he could possibly be, and people say he achieved just…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    France and UK came up with the policy of appeasement which was a policy with nazi germany that would allow hitler to take a lot more land than he was supposed to. The reason being is the policy was put into place so that the UK and france would let Hitler do what he wanted as long as he didnt do what they told him not to do. The policy of appeasement however did not work because Hitler was not someone you could appease. Once Hitler invaded poland the policy ended thus ending the reign of letting hitler walk all over…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Obama VS Chamberlain

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages

    When Chamberlain went to Munich on September 29th, 1938, to ask Hitler to discontinue, as he would have said, his plans to take over Poland, Chamberlain had good intention, but bad execution. He claimed that the appeasement was for, "The peace of our time," and that his agreement with Hitler, that which Hitler publically disregarded 7 days later, would allow Europe to continue war-free, sparing it from the trauma and anxiety associated with war. It is well known that Chamberlain failed utterly to accomplish anything with the appeasement, and war did in fact break out the following year. Recently, President Obama went to Geneva to negotiate peace terms with Iran regarding them physically possessing nuclear weapons, and failed to accomplish anything. In fact, Iran slapped America in the face by completely undermining America's request, and this is the cause for much controversy and ill feelings toward Obama as of late.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Germany declared attack on September 1, 1939, starting the beginning of World War II. The Treaty of Versailles definitely plays a huge role in the contributions to World War II. If Germany was never held accountable for their actions, they wouldn’t have been in dept. A State of depression would leave any country vulnerable.. Hitler saw his opportunity and went for it. No one dare stood up to Hitler, he was a man to fear in the 40’s. He is well known for the genocide of Jews during World War II.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the 1930s, lots of politicians in both Britain and France came to see that the terms of the Treaty of Versailles had placed restrictions on Germany that were unfair. Hitler's actions were seen as understandable and justifiable.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain gave this speech to the House of Commons on September 1st, 1939, hours after Hitler's troops had invaded Poland. Chamberlain and others had spent years negotiating with Hitler in order to prevent another war in Europe. The point of this speech is too inform people of what Hitler has done and of what the British response will be.…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays