Central London Property Trust Ltd V High Trees House Ltd

Topics: Common law, Renting, English contract law Pages: 1 (291 words) Published: November 28, 2011
Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd KB 130 (or the High Trees case) is an English contract law decision in the High Court. It reaffirmed the doctrine of promissory estoppel in contract law in England and Wales. Denning J held estoppel to be, Facts

In 1937, High Trees House Ltd leased a block of flats in Clapham, London, for a rate £2500/year from Central London Property Trust Ltd. Due to the conditions during the beginning of World War II occupancy rates were drastically lower than normal. In January 1940, to ameliorate the situation the parties made an agreement in writing to reduce rent by half. However, neither party stipulated the period for which this reduced rental was to apply. Over the next five years, High Trees paid the reduced rate while the flats began to fill, and by 1945, the flats were back at full occupancy. Central London sued for payment of the full rental costs from June 1945 onwards (i.e. for last two quarters of 1945). Judgment

Based on previous judgments such as Hughes v Metropolitan Railway Co, Denning J held that the full rent was payable from the time that the flats became fully occupied in mid-1945. However, he continued in an obiter statement that if Central London had tried to claim for the full rent from 1940 onwards, they would not have been able to. This was reasoned on the basis that if a party leads another party to believe that he will not enforce his strict legal rights, then the Courts will prevent him from doing so at a later stage. This obiter remark was not actually a binding precedent, yet it essentially created the doctrine of promissory estoppel.
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • The Islay Whisky Company Ltd Essay
  • Essay about Chappell & Co Ltd v The Nestlé Co Ltd
  • Van Den Berghs Ltd V Clark Essay
  • Casenote Prest V Petrodel Ltd Essay
  • Mercantile Bank Ltd V The Official Assignee Of The Property Of How Han Teh Essay
  • Salomon v A Salomon & Co Ltd Essay
  • Imasco Ltd Essay
  • Trust Bank Ltd. Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free