Preview

CCJS321 Project 1

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1347 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
CCJS321 Project 1
Project 1 – The Right to Search
CCJS 321 Digital Forensics
University of Maryland University College
July 3, 2015

Project 1 – The Right to Search
1. Can you as the investigator, or Mr. Yourprop’s supervisor, search Yourprop’s personal vehicle currently parked in the Company parking lot for digital evidence?
In this scenario - assuming Makestuff Company has a policy in place for searching employee's personal property while on Company premises - a search of Mr. Yourprop's personal vehicle by the Company is justified (Workplace Searches, 2015). During his exit interview, Mr. Yourprop was acting very conniving and saying things that give the Company probable cause to believe he may be stealing their intellectual property. Because the intellectual property would be in digital form as Project X is programming code, it's reasonable for the Company to be searching for digital evidence either in Mr. Yourprop's vehicle or on his person. Also, seeing as that the personal vehicle is currently on Company property, according to the policy it's fair game. It is important remember is that this is not a random search, but one that is based upon a reasonable suspicion that the employee is stealing intellectual property.
Of course, if Mr. Yourprop refuses to allow his vehicle to be searched the Company cannot just push him out of the way and search it themselves. This the point where the Company would need to call law enforcement and allow them to handle the situation. The same goes for if the car is locked (Employees: Privacy in the Workplace, 2015).
2. If evidence of the theft of intellectual property can be found, Makestuff Company may seek to pursue criminal prosecution. Can Mr. Yourprop’s supervisor direct local police investigators to search his personal vehicle which is parked on the Company parking lot?
When it comes to search and seizure of personal property, law enforcement is required to abide by the U.S. Constitution, in particular the Fourth Amendment. The Fourth



References: Employee Handbooks. (2014, May 8). Retrieved from Society for Human Resource Management: http://www.shrm.org/templatestools/hrqa/pages/signeehandbook.aspx Employees: Privacy in the Workplace. (2015). Retrieved from Lawyers.com: http://labor-employment-law.lawyers.com/employees-privacy-in-the-workplace.html#six Employers ' right of search. (2015). Retrieved from Right Hand HR: http://www.rhhr.com/employers-right-of-search/ K-Mart Corp. v. Trotti, 677 S.W.2d 632 (Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston First District 1984). Privacy at Work: What Are Your Rights? (2015). Retrieved from FindLaw: http://employment.findlaw.com/workplace-privacy/privacy-at-work-what-are-your-rights.html Scripps Howard News Service. (2013, August 18). Can your Company search your personal belongings at work? Daily Republic, p. B8. Retrieved from Daily Republic: http://www.dailyrepublic.com/uncategorized/can-your-company-search-your-personal-belongings-at-work/ Searches at Work - Legal Issues to Consider. (n.d.). Retrieved from Texas Workforce Commission: http://www.twc.state.tx.us/news/efte/searches_at_work_legal_issues_to_consider.html U.S. Const. amend. IV. Workplace Searches. (2015). Retrieved from Workplace Fairness: https://www.workplacefairness.org/workplace-searches#5

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution reads: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized (The Free Dictionary 2013)…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to ryan peterson in the article entitled "Employee Personal Use of Company Vehicles" Personal use of vehicles provided by the employer may…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Laws Enforced by EEOC. (2014). Retrieved June 25, 2014, from U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission: http://www.eeoc.gov/laws/statutes/titlevii.cfm…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Police may search a vehicle incident to a recent occupant's arrest if it is reasonable to believe the vehicle contains evidence of the offense of arrest. Gant, 556 U.S. 332 at 351.…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    a. May a law enforcement officer conduct an automobile search as an incident to all lawful arrests, or must the officer reasonably fear for his own safety or for the integrity of the evidence before searching the automobile?…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    INF 325 Week 1: A Case Study

    • 2472 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Behaviors such as transferring files from a work device to a home computer that is not protected or maintained to IT’s standards, using personal communications that are not as safe as corporate communications, talking about sensitive company matters where others can hear the conversation, and failing to use a laptop privacy guard when working remotely in a public place all invite information theft. Employees also fail to safeguard equipment such as laptop computers and portable storage devices, which can be lost or stolen (Cisco Systems, 2008, p 5).…

    • 2472 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The discovery and search are procedures affirmed by cases New York v. Belton, 453 U.S. 454, (1981), Arizona v. Gant, 566 U.S. 332, (2009) and Wyoming v. Houghton, 526 U.S. 295, (1999). In the case of New York v. Belton, the court ruled that officers can search a car and any compartments in the car after conducting an arrest. This allows the search of the vehicle in the case of Rounds, because he was in custody in the patrol car, and he was arrested. Arizona v. Gant held that the search of a vehicle, after its occupant is arrested, is permissible if it is reasonable to believe that there is evidence linked to the arrest. Since Officer Towns first arrested and placed Rounds in the patrol car and then moved to question the opaque bag, he was in his right, especially because there was reason to believe that the contents of the bag could be linked to evidence of Rounds’s past crime: possession of marijuana. The prosecution cites Wyoming v. Houghton as well. This case dictates that as long as there is probable cause to search a vehicle, all following searches, including those of its contents are legal. Since there was probable cause to search Rounds’s vehicle, the recovery and seizure of the opaque bag was constitutional.…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Officer Nelson Case Essay

    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages

    W.M.’s unusual relationship with Mr. Larson prompted Officer Nelson to engage in an extensive and thorough investigation to resolve any ambiguity or uncertainty regarding W.M.’s authority to consent to the search of the apartment. “[W]here an officer is presented with ambiguous facts related to authority, he or she has a duty to investigate further before relying on the consent.” United States v. Kimoana, 383 F.3d 1215, 1222 (10th Cir. 2004). Even when consent is accompanied by an explicit assertion of residency, if the surrounding circumstances cause a reasonable person to doubt the party’s authority, the officer must proceed with further inquiry. United States v. Rosario, 962 F.2d 733, 738 (7th Cir. 1992).…

    • 1694 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cheetum Case Summary

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages

    These factors are: (1) the employee's relationship to the item seized; (2) whether the item was in the immediate control of the employee when it was seized; and (3) whether the employee took actions to maintain privacy over the item. U.S. v. Anderson, 154 F.3d 1225.…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    THE EVIDENCE FOUND IN THE CLOSED CONTAINER IS ADMISSIBLE BECAUSE THE AUTOMOBILE EXCEPTION APPLIES TO THE RV ALLOWING SCOPE OF THE SEARCH DUE TO ITS MOBILITY PROVEN 10 DAYS AFTER THE ARREST…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3. Identify a range of places where a person can find information on employment rights and responsibilities. You should identify at least two internal and two external sources of information.…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This morning the alleged employee recognizes that the supplier is his company. I did all the investigations and I have evidence that he could not deny. It took me time to figure out how I should conduct the interview. Actually, I learn it from you.…

    • 75 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    4th Amendment

    • 2115 Words
    • 9 Pages

    All Americans are entitled to their rights. The Fourth Amendment states that we the people have to deny search and seizures from law enforcement without a warrant. The fourth amendment generally prohibits police from entering a home without a warrant unless the circumstances fit an established exception to the warrant requirement. According to the book The Constitution: Our Written Legacy by Joseph A. Melusky, the Fourth Amendment gives the right of the people to be secure in their person, houses, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures. Although we are entitled to these rights, police sometimes use and abuse their authority. In many cases, the Fourth Amendment has helped prove the innocence of one’s actions.…

    • 2115 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    “The Fourth Amendment provides the people of the United States, the right to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects. Against unreasonable searches, and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons and things to be seized” (U.S Constitutional Amendments, 1972). The design of this Amendment is to create a type of barrier in order to protect individual rights to privacy, also preventing illegal search, and seizure of personal property. These search warrants are in…

    • 1424 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Privacy can be defined in many terms; however they all mean the same thing. Privacy means that there are certain guidelines to follow that determine what personal information can and can’t be shared and with whom. Employee privacy rights include their personal information and any other activities at work. Companies that work in a private sector have some legal obligations to their employees however; they can dictate many of the employee’s privacy rights.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays