Preview

CaseRfftBBE

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
653 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
CaseRfftBBE
Case One: Cool Beans

Rouses Corp. (Rouses) is a calendar year-end company. On February 1, 2014, Rouses announced that it was acquiring 80 percent of the outstanding common stock of Best Beans Ever Corp. (Best Beans Ever) in a business combination. On the acquisition date, Rouses paid $40 million in cash and issued two million shares of Rouses common stock to the selling shareholders of Best Beans Ever. All of the outstanding stock options granted to employees of Best Beans Ever will be replaced with Rouses stock options as required by the merger agreement. Rouses is accounting for the transaction in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations.
1. Determining Consideration Transferred On August 1, 2014, Rouses acquired Best Beans Ever. The Rouses share price was $30 on the announcement date and $35 on the acquisition date. The parties agreed that Rouses would issue the selling shareholders an additional one million shares if Best Beans Ever revenues for the 12-month period after the acquisition were at least $150 million. The fair value of the contingent consideration was determined to be $20 million as of the acquisition date. The value of the replacement stock option awards attributable to pre-combination services is $5 million, and the portion that relates to post-combination services is $7 million. Rouses incurred $4 million of acquisition related costs.
2. Fair Value of Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed Best Beans Ever owns a manufacturing facility in Lafayette, Louisiana. The facility is comprised of land, two buildings, and machinery. There are no other significant assets located at this facility. The land could be rezoned into a residential subdivision for a nominal fee and management has determined that the fair value of the underlying land as residential property would be $30 million, after considering costs necessary to prepare it for use as residential lots (i.e., demolition costs of the building, net of the fair value of scrap

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Billy s Beats

    • 1075 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Billy’s acquisition of Little Drummer took place in 201X for an outlay of $575 million in cash; an external valuation specialist assessed the fair values of significant acquired assets at $865 million (PP&E), and $145 million (other assets). Billy’s used the previously determined useful lives for PP&E (determined by Little Drummer’s management) of 30 years for plant, and 20 years for equipment respectively. These calculations differ from those used by Billy’s, which come in at 20 years for plant, and 10 years for equipment. In addition, customer lists acquired in the purchase were determined to have a useful life of 15 years.…

    • 1075 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Billy's Beats Inc.

    • 613 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The valuation specialist allocated the plant fair value of $865 million to each asset class based on the percentage of the seller’s total original cost applicable to each asset class. These percentages were provided by management of Little Drummer and relied on by the valuation specialist. The engagement team compared the percentage of total costs to a client prepared spreadsheet listing each asset class, asset ID, and percentage of total cost. No errors were noted and, accordingly, no further testing of the client-prepared spreadsheet was…

    • 613 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Billy S Beats Inc

    • 1267 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Management of Billy’s made several assumptions towards its newly acquired company, Little Drummer Boy. Management finally adopted the assumptions that the fair value of significant assets acquired was $865 million and that of other assets was $145 million. At the same time of the acquisition, management also decided that useful lives of the acquired plant and equipment were 30 years and 15 years, respectively, which were different from the 20 years and 10 years useful lives for the previously owned plant and equipment. Furthermore, management determined a useful live of 15 years for the acquired customer list. Regarding the $865 million assumption, auditors only adopted the procedure to compare the percentage used to calculate the fair market value to a client prepared spreadsheet. Regarding the useful lives of the plant and equipment, first, auditors inquired the management of Billy’s. Then, auditors made a discussion with the manager of Litter Drummer about the useful lives it previously assigned to the plant and equipment. Auditors only focused on the valuation and allocation assertion towards its assumptions.…

    • 1267 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    case9discharge

    • 404 Words
    • 3 Pages

    HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS: This is a 50-year-old female with a long history of bilateral hip disease. She was born with arthrogryposis. She had a right total hip replacement done about 28 years ago. She is admitted now because of x-ray evidence of loosening of the right femoral implant and pain with ambulation.…

    • 404 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Accountancy Study Guide

    • 2024 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Richer Company paid $21,000 to buy 4,000 shares of its $6 par value common stock for the treasury. The stock was originally sold for $25,000. The entry to record the purchase includes a…

    • 2024 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dixon Case

    • 1644 Words
    • 7 Pages

    We developed pro forma financial statements with projected incremental cash flows associated with this acquisition (Exhibit II). Following 1984, the following assumptions are used: (1) EBIT stabilizes and stays constant at 1984 levels through 1989, (2) capital expenditures are 600 per year after 1984, (3) net working capital increases by 8% per year after 1984. The 8% increases in Net Working Capital were assumed to be driven by an increase of difference between current asset and current liability by subtracting accounts payable from inventory and accounts receivable.…

    • 1644 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Are you more likely to purchase a product from a company with a strong commitment to sustainability?…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First scenario, if Sally chooses stock options and hold until maturity date. Ignoring the taxation and other constraints, the future value of cash compensation at the end of the 5th year will be 5000 * (1 + 0.0602) ^ 5 = 6697.44. We can easily form the equation 3000 * (P – 35) = 6697.44, where P is the future stock price of Telstar, so the stock price must increase to at least 37.23 at the end of 5th year to get the same amount of the cash compensation and if the stock price where to stay below 35, Sally’ option would be worth nothing. The stock, which pays no dividend and is not expected to pay one in the foreseeable future, is trading at 18.75. It seems significant difference between the exercise price and the spot price. As shown in Exhibit 2, Telstar stock price has increased higher than $35 only once and 10-year average stock price is around 20. Therefore, the chance that the value of option is greater than the cash compensation is very rare.…

    • 1045 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Davis Boatworks

    • 4530 Words
    • 19 Pages

    We employed the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) with this data to find the value the firm to be $1.69million - $2.89 million.…

    • 4530 Words
    • 19 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    List two ways that fair value could be determined for intangible assets acquired as part of a business combination. (2 Marks)…

    • 1001 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Adavanced Accounting

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages

    EXERCISE 3-3 (1) Determination and Distribution of Excess Schedule Company Parent NCI Implied Price Value Fair Value (80%) (20%) Fair value of subsidiary $340,000* $272,000 $ 68,000 Less book value of interest acquired: Common stock ($10 par) $100,000 Retained earnings 150,000 Total equity $250,000 $250,000 $250,000 Interest acquired 80% 20% Book value $200,000 $ 50,000 Excess of fair value over book value $ 90,000 $ 72,000 $ 18,000 Adjustment of identifiable accounts: Worksheet Amortization Adjustment Key Life per Year Fixed assets $60,000 debit D1 10 $6,000 Goodwill 30,000 debit D2 Total $90,000 *$272,000/80% = $340,000 (2) (CY1) Subsidiary Income 20,000 Investment in Sargo Company 20,000 To eliminate parent’s share of subsidiary earnings for the current year.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Valuation Hp Merger

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Robert F. Bruner, APPLIED MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS http://www.authorstream.com/Presentation/aSGuest43708-380676-hp-compaq-merger-analysis-entertainment-ppt-powerpoint/ 12 23 Carly’s Big Party Plans 5.0% sales erosion 8.1% EBIT margin (resulting from $2.5BN cost savings) 7.0% net income margin 10.7% ROC Post-merger share price: $24.85 Synergy Calculations HWP Intrinsic Firm Value 3 6,695,889 CPQ Intrinsic Firm Value 10,682,654 Value of HWP + CPQ without Synergy 4 7,378,542 Value of HWP + CPQ with Synergy 8 2,564,626 Value of Synergy 35,186,083 Price Paid by HWP 2 5,000,000…

    • 260 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In December 2000, management at General Mills (GM) proposed a plan to acquire Pillsbury, a baked- goods producer, in a stock-for-stock exchange. Pillsbury is currently controlled by Diageo PLC, one of the world’s leading consumer–goods companies. The deal specifies that General Mills is to create and thus issue additional shares of common stock to Diageo in exchange for complete ownership of the Pillsbury subsidiary. If the deal is executed, Diageo will become General Mills’ largest shareholder. The consideration to Diageo would include 141 million shares of the company 's common stock and the assumption of $5.142 billion of Pillsbury debt, making the deal worth over $10 billion. In addition, the agreement will contain a contingency, as up to $642 million of the total transaction value may be repaid to General Mills at the first anniversary of the closing, depending on its (20-day) average stock price at that time. Therefore, we must calculate and thus analyze the various costs and savings associated with the transaction to determine whether or not General Mills’ shareholders should vote for the proposed merger. If approved, this will be the biggest takeover in GM’s 136 years of business and General Mills will become the fifth largest food company in the world (Forster, 2002).…

    • 7232 Words
    • 29 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    List two ways that fair value could be determined for intangible assets acquired as part of a business combination. (2 Marks)…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Company (CCC). CCC’s computers are sold for a total of $16 million. What is the value added to…

    • 4200 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays