Preview

Case Study: Keays V. Honda

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
267 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case Study: Keays V. Honda
Fact Summary:

Kevin Keays had been employed with Honda Canada for 14 years when he was fired. During his employment, Keays was diagnosed with choric fatigue syndrome and was granted disability leave for about two years. After the two years Keays returned to work, however Honda became concerned when Keays was continuously absent. Honda requested Keays visit with the organizations occupational medicine specialist to further diagnose his condition. Keays refused to abide with Hondas request and sought legal guidance at which point Honda terminated his employment.

The Keays versus Honda case was presented in court three times. The first of which ended in Keays favor with the trial judge ordering Honda to pay Keays damages based on a

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    FACTS Fitness center member Gina Stelluti sustained various injuries while participating in a fitness class. The plaintiff in this case claimed that her injuries were the result of the defendant’s negligence in regards to failing to repair the broken exercise bike, which had caused the injuries to the plaintiff. The defendant had filed for a motion for summery. The original trial court had granted that request. This request was granted due to a liability contract that cleared the defendant of negligence and gross negligence.…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the case Reeves v. Ernst & Young there was an agricultural cooperative entitled Security the Farmer’s Cooperative of Arkansas and Oklahoma that numerous members (23,000). In order to raise money to support its general business operations, they sold to investors promissory notes that were payable upon demand. This note was showcased to all including members and non-members and noted that it was an “investment program” and offered higher interest rates. Co-op accumulated more than 1,600 people that purchased the notes, totaling $10 million but later Co-op filed for bankruptcy. There was a law suit filed by a class of holders stating that there was a violation of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. When considering the…

    • 238 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plaintiff, for all times mentioned herein, was and is a resident of the County of Jackson, State of Missouri.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unfortunately, a corporation can be charged and convicted of any number of crimes. If the employees or officers within a corporation violate the law on behalf of the corporation and within the scope of their employment, the corporate entity would be open to criminal charges. Corporations can be convicted of criminal wrongdoing in the same manner individuals are charged and convicted. In addition, individuals within the corporation can be charged as well. Commonly, when a corporation is charged, many of the top officers will be charged along with the corporation as an entity.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Use the land already purchased: This is a huge project and with this they have already bought and acquired land. Instead of getting them out of town New London can simply use what they already have bought and changed the plans. This is a medium ground for both of the parties involved.…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Is it constitutional to take away money from a person although it was gained for an interview with a publisher about one’s past crimes? Is it constitutional to take the money and give it to the victim of these past crimes? Does this or does not contradict the First Amendment which allows to express one’s mind freely with no discrimination concerning the context? The dispute over the Son of Sam law can be lead down to one question: whether speaking about crime is also a crime. Obviously, there could be two answers, one negative, and another one positive. According to the Son of Sam law, there is only one interpretation: if a…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lee V. Weisman Case Study

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Summary of Key Facts A. Deborah Weisman graduated from Nathan Bishop Middle School, a public…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Harte-Hanks Communications Inc. v. Connaughton (1989). This civil law case refined the actual malice standard.…

    • 545 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Second, the Plaintiff is incapacitated within the meaning of the ADA. Third, the Plaintiff could have completed the job with rational accommodations. Forth, the Plaintiff was subject to adversative employment action due to the incapacity.…

    • 443 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Attila Nagy 9/18/2017 ENC3465 Legal Brief 3 State of New York v. Robert Strong Facts Robert Strong belongs to the Sudan Muslim religious faith, which later named him one of the leaders. As part of a well-known ceremony, he performed a religious exercise on the victim by plunging three knives into his chest to stop his heartbeat and breathing without any health repercussion thereafter. Even though this has occurred for over forty years without any fatality, the victim did not survive this exercise. Issue Is the defendant, who fatally exercised his powers of “mind over matter” through plunging knives into victim’s chest for ceremonial purposes, guilty of manslaughter in the second degree? Rule…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jones V. Tsige Case Study

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The tort system provides compensation to individuals who have been wronged or injured by the activity of another individual. Until the Ontario Court of Appeal decision in Jones v. Tsige in 2012, resulting in the creation of the tort of intrusion upon seclusion, the common law did not include torts that did not entail a personal or financial injury. It is essential the common law includes torts that do not entail actual injury to provide individuals the means of seeking remedies when they are wronged from the wrongdoer responsible for the action.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Defendant: Case Study

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Defendant when his daughter was living with him constantly updated the Plaintiff of what was going on with their daughter.…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Did Ford exhibit “malice” which is necessary to establish in order to award punitive damages? (Yes)…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Paralegal Studies

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The next case I reviewed was Walker verses State. A hit a run took place where a witness gave a description of a vehicle and the direction the vehicle had been heading. Two officers, driving separately, went in the direction and found the car. Walker, the car owner, started to the door. As the screen door began to shut, Officer Hoffman, race to open the door. Between the tugging of the two men the door flexed causing the window to break. The evidence proved the case showed violent resistance against Walker, as recorded in Spangler v. State (1993). The State succeeded in a conviction of a Class D felony, but the Class A misdemeanor was ruled insufficient by means of Double Jeopardy. They cannot use the same evidence to convict Walker twice as a result of Richardson v. State, 717 N.E.2d 32, 49 (Ind. 1999)[->0] "No person shall be put in jeopardy twice for the same offense." Two or more offenses are the same offense for double jeopardy purposes if, "with respect to either the statutory…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “From a moral standpoint it would be misguided to equate the failings of a minor with those of an adult.”-Justice Anthony Kennedy. In 1993, Christopher Simmons was sentenced to death when he was only 17. A series of appeals to state and federal courts were submitted but each appeal was rejected. Then, in 2002, The Missouri Supreme Court stayed Simmon’s execution while the U.S Supreme Court decided Atkins v. Virginia, where the U.S. Supreme court ruled that executing the mentally ill violated Eight and 14th Amendment prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment because majority of Americans found it cruel and unusual, the Missouri Supreme Court started to reconsider Simmon’s case. Using the reasoning from this case, the Missouri court decided…

    • 1794 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays