Preview

Case Study 3: Property Right Security in Russian Deprivatization

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
536 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Case Study 3: Property Right Security in Russian Deprivatization
Property Right Security in Russian Deprivatization

Saint Leo University

Property Right Security in Russian Deprivatization

The impact that the prospects of deprivatization have on investment by managers of privatized firms is that these managers will come to a realization that additional investments are prone to more risks in respect to the potential payback. In this situation, the time frame for returns on investments is shortened immensely. The uncertainty stems from the longer time frame, which results in managers hesitating from entering as a private firm. If this notion of deprivatization is upholded upon organizations, the owners will potentially lose any gains they may possess.
The effect that deprivatization will have on foreign investments in Russia is that foreign financiers will comprehend the political risks of deprivatization in Russia is vital to the success of many organizations. They will be tentative to make capital investments in Russian businesses because there will be no security that there will be any return, regardless of how prosperous the prospect may seem to be. Deprivatization would primarily be for foreign private business owners considering they can take their profits and send them back to their home countries.
For the most part, the Russian economy would behoove having some deprivatization influenced businesses and industries. From an overall standpoint and point of view, Russia has benefited with the movement of a free market but consequently would hinder the underprivileged population if the amount of supply were not readily available. “Free market economy under centralized political control is the most effective way for these countries” (EconomyWatch, 2010).
When one is questioning the beneficiaries of political and economic decisions, the first ones to benefit from this would be the family and friends of these politicians. Also many workers will become at an advantage because since deprivatization creates openings in



References: Brickley, J.A., Smith, C.W., & Zimmerman, J.L. (2009). Managerial economics and Organizational architecture (5th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill/Irwin. EconomyWatch (2010). Advantages of Market Economy. Retrieved from http://www.economywatch.com/market-economy/advantages-market- economy.html

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    In 1897, 82% of the Russian population were peasants, leading one to the believe that any economic improvement must be both partially caused by and result in improvements in this area. This is because generally the greater the economic improvement the greater the amount of people are involved in bringing it about and the greater the number of people it affects for the better. The situation in 1894 was a mass of peasants that owned small and mainly subsistence farms. This meant that they sold very little of their produce and therefore had very little money. This was bad for two reasons. Firstly if they sold little then the state would have very little to sell to other countries, meaning that no extra wealth was coming in to Russia. Secondly, if the peasants had little money than they would not be able to buy much. If we acknowledge John Keynes’ theory of demand as true, this lack of it can only be seen as a severe impediment to the Russian economy. To answer the question, one must therefore decide if either the peasants started producing enough to sell or if less people were peasants. There is evidence to suggest that between 1890 and 1910 there was an increase of 38 million tonnes of cereals produced. One could argue that this shows economic improvement because they were working the land more efficiently, and therefore selling more so getting richer, the…

    • 2009 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Between 1800 and 1939 Russia underwent through a severe regime change. The people of Russia were in a state of great economic disparity, and the lower class faced hunger, poverty, etc. The lower class had very little of the grain, land, and fiscal control that was available in Russia, such pretext of large income disparity gaps and unbalanced control of GDP were the pre-requisites se in place for the takeover of socialism. And such is what happened. Within this time period Russia went through a proletariat revolution of communism aiming have the workers of the world unite and free themselves from capitalist oppression to create a world run by and for the working class. However even though they underwent this major social-economic change, conditions in Russia stayed around the same. We still saw that Russia was under leadership of a Totalitarian authority. And maintained the same economic conditions where the consumer-based market never developed and the population was largely rural and the economy was agricultural based.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Although Stalin was the key figure for economy Alexander II still had a great input in helping Russia strive. Alexander allowed rapid industrialisation through the construction of railways as they allowed main areas of industrial production, (for example the towns with high agricultural production), to import trading markets. Additionally the system also linked ports onto the Black Sea and so helped enable foreign trade. Also, various tariff reforms were created at first they were lowered to increase foreign trade however as exportation increased the tariffs were raised to prevent trade imbalance and ultimately protect Russia’s economy. Overall, the attempts of creating a ‘liberalised’ economy was fairly successful as between 1860-1890 coal…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Russian reforms started to create industrialization. After Russia lost the Crimean War, they saw that they were stuck in the past. While the rest of Europe had gone through an Industrial Revolution improving their militaries and other aspects of their economy, Russia was stuck in serfdom without the need to advance. This led Russia to be trying to compete with far superior technologies. The loss showed them that they need to catch up to Europe. They imposed a series of reforms to try and improve their economy. One of the first changes they made was getting rid of serfdom. By abolishing serfdom, the Russian economy was able to go through an industrial revolution, creating more and more jobs.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The economy of the Soviet Union was based on a system of state ownership of the means of production, collective farming, industrial manufacturing and centralized administrative planning. Starting in 1924, with Stalin rising to power, the period of the centralized economy made the central government of Russia formulate all economic decisions. The command economy was one of the key features of the Soviet society, however, it came with benefits and setbacks. For example, an advantage would be low levels of employment and a disadvantage would be lack of competition. A major strength was an enormous supply of oil and gas.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    3 The problem is that privatisation is controversial despite empirical studies showing that it is a highly successful policy. In this essay, I set out arguments why privatisation is politically unpopular despite its…

    • 158 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In a public enterprise economy, the government has the power to nationalize any or all industries which can lead to devastating consequences. One the countries famous for doing this was the Soviet Union. Joseph Stalin, the then dictator of the Soviet Union instituted two domestic policies that would eliminate any capitalism in Russia. He would institute rapid industrialization and the collectivization of agriculture.This would be known as the Five Year Plan. Stalin wanted to change all private owned farms into state owned farms as he thought this would improve agricultural productivity. This grain was then expected to feed all the urban workers and any surplus would pay for programs and factories related to industrialization. He would put down a certain quota that the farmers needed to reach by a certain amount of time. However the farmers were not allowed to take grain away from what they were growing for the state until they met the quota. This led to a massive famine of 1932-33 in the Ukraine in which millions died. At first the peasants resisted the idea of collective farms and so Stalin purged the land of any that opposed it. In 1929, Stalin needed to finance his industrialization plans so he raised the quotas of grain in the Ukraine by forty percent. By raising the quotas so high, the farmers would not be able to produce enough food to feed themselves and as it was illegal for them to take any until the quotas were met. Those farmers that did not appear to be starving were suspected of hoarding grain. In the end the death toll in the Ukrained was over six million people dead. This clearly shows how when the government has the power to nationalize industries like agriculture, devastating results can occur. The Russian government was trying to progress itself forward economically at any price even the death of its citizens. This type of government presence in the economy should not be promoted due to the serious problems it can cause.…

    • 1614 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Post Soviet Privatization

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages

    On midnight of December 31st 1991, the Soviet Union collapsed, along with the communist ideals that it followed. The former the soviet union were forced to transition from a communism to a private government literally overnight, which is why it was referred to as spontaneous privatization. This abrupt economic reform cause problems with the people, as the government struggled to devise an efficient and fair way to distribute the wealth. The government wanted to take a democratic approach to mending the economy, so the plans they proposed promoted free market economy where the distribution of wealth is left up to the people, with a low amount of government interference. For people to distribute the wealth they must first obtain it, making this the first step in privatizing the former union.…

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    While created with good intentions, the economic reforms introduced by Perestroika ended in failure to an inability of the Soviet workforce and market to adapt to rapidly changing conditions. The perestroika reforms were created so that people in the Soviet Union would be able to start their own privately-owned businesses. Starting a business however was no easy task in the Soviet Union. The communist government had funded all production and so the ideas of investors giving money to private businesses simply wasn’t there. Getting the funding for a businesses was next to impossible for those who wished to start a business. In addition the tax…

    • 771 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russia Before 1881

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Russia’s was mainly a rural country , with agriculture being the main source to the economy- the problem is even though Russia was getting lots of money from agriculture is that that it still wasn’t enough and as the main industry was agriculture they had hardly any secondary industry’s and were very backwards…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the time frame of 1917-1991, the country of Russia had a communist based economic system. Thus, meaning that its government possessed “the” full “control of” its “industry and of all the branches of production” done by its many businesses, and/or affiliates, even if they were not huge, and/or name branded (Document 3, #1). While it might have seemed like a good idea to have kept tabs on all of its businesses, the Russian government eventually ended up harming the aforementioned lower class industries. According to T.P Whitney, the writer of “The Russian Peasant Wars on…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    both could benefit businesses in different ways. Because Putin was striving to create a more…

    • 2574 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There is always a positive relationship between economic development and equality or income. The Linearity theory states that economic development leads to urbanization which leads to communication which leads to high levels of education and in turn leads to Democracy. This theory does an excellent job in showing how economics lead to a change in political systems. Wealthier nations such as the United States, Japan and other European countries often have more reasonable income distributions than poorer countries. But countries like Russia had a poor distribution of social economy due to communism. The USSR was a communist country believing in state owned and centrally planned government. The communists were able to keep up with the other large capital powers of the world. But as time went on and they tried to catch up, their economy was too hard to control. Their products were poor quality and their quantity was created on a need basis. There was no efficiency. The people of Russia would have to wait years for cars, apartments and waited hours in lines for simple things like food and other basic necessities. The soviets began to argue with the government. In 1991, Russia had gone through the worst of it 's inflation and industrial problems. Eventually Russia became…

    • 1342 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Class-Based Oppression

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages

    the lower class and favors the upper class. This results in the exploitation of the working…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Several differences in Russia’s Fiscal Policy from the other countries are the multiple measures that are available to evaluate the performance of fiscal policy. Russia’s debt-stabilizing surplus funding through the Russian Central Bank is Russia’s most appropriate measure when evaluating its ability to sustain the public debt in the long-term. Russia currently has the third largest GDP growth rate next to India being second, China being first, and Brazil being fourth; however, Russia ranks 13th on the Global scale. President Putin’s new fiscal policy in 2006 allowed Russia’s currency (in rubles) to become interchangeable for both recent and capital transactions. Russia also overhauled its entire tax system by taxing and saving the ever-increasing oil export revenues and provided flat 12% flat rate taxation for its citizens opposed to the higher tax rates for various citizen classes from other countries. In addition an integrated tax system was put in place for corporations providing a 110% improvement on tax collection. During 2007 the Russian federal budget surplus was 6.5% of GDP, and in 2008 the Russian Government finished the year with a surplus of 5.1% of GDP. Russia’s new standard fiscal stance and fiscal impulse were the most appropriate measures in evaluating how much fiscal policy was contributed to changes in aggregate demand.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays