Capital Punishment: The answer to Modern Society?
An argument into why criminals need to be punished in severity to their crimes.
Capital Punishment. Judicial Execution. The Death Penalty. All different ways to say "True Justice." The Modern Justification system is simply not working and there needs to be change! Change is the only way that society can be hauled from this prison of crime that it had purged itself in to, by denying this, are you saying that what is happening on the streets and behind closed doors today is right? Are you saying that people being killed, just because of the color of their skin, is right? Are you saying that you could live every day, knowing that there is someone out there, willing to harm any innocent bystander, your children, your family, your friends, that there is someone out there, being harmed, because a threat is still out there? The fact remains that criminals are simply not being punished in severity to their crimes! They're not afraid of the consequences, so they have nothing to stop them from committing any unlawful acts. All, and only, guilty people need to be punished sufficiently because real justice requires people to suffer for and understand their wrongdoing. Criminals need to understand the suffering, agony and pain- both mental and physical- that they inflicted upon their victims. That those innocent people endured because of them. However, you could argue that retribution to crimes other than murder do not mimic the action that was inflicted, and that is correct, so the sufficient punishment for each crime should be the same crime that they committed, but inflicted upon the criminal to a possible extent. For example, rapists should have their genitals removed, and the words "guilty of rape" tattooed across their foreheads in red ink and all those guilty of neglect should be placed in an empty room and left to their thoughts without food, water, or sanitary requirements, till the point where they are about to decease (if the victim lived), or they will pass away in the room if their victim had died because of the neglect that was inflicted upon them. Execution methods would need to be mildly public (so that people of appropriate age know how they may view them taking place and where, but not so open that young children may accidentally stumble upon them) and humiliating, so that criminals would not want to commit crimes because if they continued to live with such humiliation, they would be degraded in the eyes of those that idolized them. To make an analogy: If you where a serial killer that simply loved to kill (for whatever pleasures or adrenaline rushes you enjoyed), but where aware that if found, you would be killed by a lethal injection, no guaranteed pain, would you be particularly scared of the consequences to your actions? Consider that you where either physically abused as a child, suffered malnutrition or alcoholism, and so you had severe damage to the frontal lobe, the hypothalamus and the limbic system, which can contribute to extreme aggression, loss of control, loss of judgment and violence- in short, brain damage (or biological abnormalities), so you have little concern for your life, but still feel pain. Henry Lee Lucas, who was convicted of 11 murders, was shown to have extreme brain damage in these areas, Arthur Shawcross, another man who had killed 11 people, was found to have two skull fractures and several brain injuries, thus contributing to the theory that almost all serial killers may suffer from brain damage, mental issues, troubled childhoods, or are simply psychotic. It is unlikely that you would fear the injection, so instead, consider that your execution would be much more painful, such as hanging or electrocution, and you would be much more regretful of what you had done: witnesses, or those that could have been influenced by the crimes you committed, would also think again before following your example, as they would have seen the...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document