Preview

Capital Punishment Analysis

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1491 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Capital Punishment Analysis
Warrington 1 …show more content…
In an article written by Marc Hyden he states, ?Submitting the power to kill U.S. Citizens to the State is unwise considering [the] history of error and malfeasance? (1). Hyden is saying that to allow the State to determine whether someone should die or not is not a smart idea. People make mistakes; it?s what they do. But when it comes down to making a mistake about sending an innocent person to death, that is a mistake that you cannot undo or make right. In this article by Hyden, he talks about the innocent being killed by allowing the state to determine whether or not someone is put on death row, how some are being tortured due to botched executions, and how it does not deter crime as much as people like to think. To Hyden, the death penalty should be abolished because of the State having too much authority than they should, because it kills innocent people, and because there are many botched executions. To others, these things could all be satisfying to them. They support the death penalty and they want to see people die for what they did. Hyden says, ?There?s no greater authority than the power to take life, and our government currently reserves the authority to kill the citizens it?s supposed to serve? (2). This statement is heavy. The government has an extremely powerful thing over people?s heads. Although there are horrendous crimes, does that give the government the …show more content…
These people may or may not have committed a heinous crime, but some of those suspects do not want to be sentenced to death because of it. In an article, David R. Dow talks about the hundred death row inmates he has defended over the last twenty years. Some ask him for appeals to be killed as soon as possible because they cannot bare a life of imprisonment until their time to die comes. He also fights very hard for his victims and although he has helped inmates get their death sentence converted to a life in prison, his clients still feel betrayed. Dow states, ?Let me be clear: most of my clients want to live. Most of them prefer a life of virtually no freedom to no life at all. But underlying this preference is a hope, however faint, they might one day get out? (2). Death row inmates are people with feelings as well. Perhaps their crime was an act of hate, hurt, spite, or just because they generally wanted to, no one wants their life taken away from them. If they did just make a mistake and not mean to they might want to get out to correct their wrong. And although their chances of that are slim to none, it does not hurt to have some glimmer of hope in a place full of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Some people might agree with the death penalty. Families get devastated when someone they love and care about has died. Its different when that person they care so much about has been murdered or killed. People tend to hate that person and have the urge to do just about anything to them in order for them to suffer, which causes us to take, revenge on them. This matter has lead to the death penalty. This is a punishment that slowly kills the man or woman that has committed the crime. Why should we have pity on those who choose to kill? If they felt powerful enough to kill, then we should be able to do the same to them. Whatever their reason is that they choose to kill they should be punished someway, somehow.…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fred Romano believes that the death penalty is not for revenge, but for justice. Romano found his newly-wedded daughter dismembered, abused, routed, and lifeless after she didn't answer his calls. Romano speculates that one day people will claim that the life without parole sentence is too severe, and a bill will pass that permits killers to get out of prison without parole. Romano strongly believes that the death penalty is justice for murderers. The death penalty reduces crime, wakes up society, and helps victims' families. The death penalty should be used to punished violent criminals.…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Why should we do them the favor of ending their misery? That is not fair. If they really want to end their misery, let them do it themselves. It’s free, and we can’t blame ourselves for the wrong-doing. More realistically, there are a handful of people on death row that are there for the wrong reasons. Either they were just in the wrong place at the wrong time, or they are taking the heat for someone else. This leads me to my next point.…

    • 1280 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    According to our governor O’Malley the death penalty is wasteful, ineffective and does not deter crime from happening (www.usatoday.com/publications). These are very powerful words coming from a powerful government official. However, what was most appealing and most believable to me is what governor O’Malley expresses next. He believes that we should rather spend money on crime prevention and victim’s compensations than on costly death penalty procedures and appeals. (www.usatoday.com/publications). However, in Gail Ewing’s article, her opinion is very clear: “The appeals process is the problem, not the execution. The right thing to do is to keep the death penalty and to improve the appeals process to ensure that the execution happens in a reasonable amount of time” (www.gazette.net). The biggest question remains is once the death penalty is abolished, will the money really go where governor O’Malley said it would: to crime prevention and victim’s compensations? The death penalty was a very powerful way to bring the justice to the victim’s families in the state of Maryland. What will happen now after the Death penalty is abolished? What about the victim’s families and their cry for justice? This statement brings us to next very important topic of our discussion: the victims and their different perspectives on the death…

    • 1731 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Death Penalty. This name alone would scare anyone and it is undoubtable the worst penalty a person could receive. It has been used for centuries, but today many argue that this punishment is not moral, while there are others that argue that if you are cruel enough to take a life, you deserve to get your life taken away, a life for a life. Louis Pojman and Jeffrey Reiman have debated this issue very closely, coming up with two opposite opinions on capital punishment. I will argue that even though I can see why Pojman thinks the way he does, he just doesn’t have enough evidence to back up his thesis when comparing it to Reiman’s. I will suggest an adjusted version of Pojman’s argument on deterrence for capital punishment by looking…

    • 619 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    If a child commits a serious crime like murder, robbery, or arson, should they go to jail? For some time now, supreme courts point out that some juveniles who commit crimes should not go to jail. Others would argue otherwise. Someone who views an act of crime as simply an act of crime would agree that a child who commits a crime would not be a child anymore. The Supreme Court defends the juveniles attempting to justify their actions as naïve like, and that sentencing them to a life sentence without parole is unconstitutional. I believe in the minority group that argues with Supreme Court justices on why they should be sentenced to prison for long periods of time.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty is a major topic for debate Shannon Rafferty defends in her portfolio published by Penn State entitled “Death Penalty Persuasive Essay.” She believes the penalty should be allowed because it functions as a deterrent, it provides society retribution and it is morally just. Olivia H. disagrees with use of the death penalty in her essay “Capital Punishment Is Dead wrong.” She tells about the risk of punishing the innocent, and how the states are doing irreversible acts of crime. As the authors disagree about whether the death penalty should be allowed, they have some common ground when it comes to admitting the potential for human error and in both disagreeing to the use of barbaric punishments by the government.…

    • 413 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    When understanding criminal law it is important to consider the positive and negative effects that different punishment alternatives can have. Over the last century the use of capital punishment, the legal process for which an individual is sentence to death when found guilty of committing a crime, has been a subject debated back and forth between government parties on its effectiveness. Many people believe that the issues of fairness, constitutionality, morality of an individual’s life, and potential of convicting the innocent are too important to allow the use of the…

    • 2611 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    If we examine some arguments presented from both sides, opponents of the capital punishment claim that executing someone is nothing more than an immoral, state-authorized killing which undervalues the human life and destroys our respect for our government which itself says that killing is wrong. But the supporters of the death penalty think that certain murderers do deserve nothing less than a death for themselves and that although everyone is born with the right to live, criminals lose these rights at the moment when they take away the rights of another human and only by punishing them in such way, the society is affirming the value which is placed on the victim’s right to live.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every convicted felon waiting on death row costs the American people over nine million dollars yearly to imprison. Such an absurd amount of money should be spent on the rehabilitation of these troubled individuals rather than in prolonging their lives only for their own demise. Before reverting to the early philosophy of Hammurabi “an eye for an eye” America should look to its own foundation, the constitution, as well as compare the costs and benefits of such a policy being legal. Despite enormous protections offered by the federal and states constitutions throughout the United States, many people have been executed in spite of evidence of their innocence. When capital punishment is concerned, most Americans believe our criminal system is close to infallible. Many assume that if factual errors do occur at trial, they will be discovered and corrected by higher courts. People believe that the innocent are rarely wrongly convicted and they are certainly not executed. Unfortunately, there is a large numbers of innocents people who…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Today, the death penalty is an issue that has raised many questions in regards to its morality. Many people believe that the death penalty is immoral for a number of factors, some of which being the execution of innocents, the arbitrary application of the death penalty, and the racial and economic discrimination with the system. Many others believe that the death penalty is moral, for it gives people what they deserve, the criminals were fully aware of the consequences that may fall upon them, and that justice is being served for the victims and families of the victims still suffering from the actions of the criminal. In this paper I will argue that from a Deontological standpoint, the death penalty is morally just. To do this, I will first describe the basics of the theory of Deontology in general, so that you, the reader, can begin to understand some of the fundamental beliefs that Kant, the father of Deontology,…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Capital Punishment, legal infliction of death as a penalty for violating criminal law. Methods of execution have included such practices as crucifixion, stoning, drowning, burning at the stake, impaling, and beheading. Today capital punishment is typically accomplished by lethal gas or injection, electrocution, hanging, or shooting.…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Has it ever occurred to you that in this country you can be executed for a crime you didn’t commit, even if the method of killing you is expensive and completely unconstitutional? The government believes that this is the correct way to punish those who have committed horrific crimes. Is this really the best option? I don’t think so. As a citizen of this country, this system of “justice” appals me. The death penalty should be abolished in the United States because it is unconstitutional, comes at a great cost, and is otherwise ineffective at carrying out its intended purpose.…

    • 1868 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The death penalty in general is very controversial on whether it should actually still take place or not. The “Death Penalty” by David Bruck was originally printed on May 20, 1985 in the New Republic. David Bruck is focusing on how to accomplish justice without using the electric chair or lynching. He uses ethos but mainly pathos appeal to argue his point. Frank Keating has a completely different idea on this matter. His article “Why I Support Capital Punishment” was published in 2000 by Human Events Publishing. He discusses all his opinions on why the death penalty should occur, while defending his state on capital punishment. To argue his opinions on executing someone he uses ethos and logos appeal. David Bruck’s claims are more effective than Frank Keating’s solely because he is able to appeal to the reader’s emotions.…

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Thesis Statement: Research suggests that capital punishment should be abolished to obviate mishandled executions, prevent wrongfully convicted citizens from being put to death and to lower taxpayer dollars for incurred expenses for inmates on death row.…

    • 2185 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics