Preview

Camp David Accord Research Paper

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1322 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Camp David Accord Research Paper
The Camp David Accord By 1978 the thirty-year war that had been fought between Egypt and Israel had come to a point where there was a chance for peace. The area that had been at the center of the turmoil was the West Bank of the Jordan River and the Gaza Strip. The problem was that both countries believed that they had the rights to this land: Israel, biblically and Egypt, politically. So an invitation by President Jimmy Carter to President Anwar Sadat of Egypt and Prime Minister Menachem Begin of Israel was extended. The invitation was for a meeting in the Catoctin Mountains of Maryland at the presidential retreat, Camp David. The meeting was so that the framework of a peace agreement, known as the Camp David Accord, could be laid out between Sadat and Begin, with Carter as the mediator. Both Sadat and Begin had their reputations and their countries' futures on the line, not to mention the future of the Middle East. All of the countries …show more content…
The American delegates thought that if the Egyptian and Israeli leaders were to budge it would be necessary to understand them and the way they thought (Blitzer 48). It was also decided that the Camp David meetings would be completely unstructured, without even an agenda to get them started, (Three 227) the hope was that this would be more conducive to the free exchange of thoughts and ideas. As the summit convened, Rosalynn Carter (President Carter's wife) recognized that the three men had one thing in common, that is, their deep religious convictions (Blitzer 48). She suggested that the summit begin with some sort of prayer. So on September 6, 1978, as the summit was starting, the three leaders issued a prayer for peace to the world, saying: "Conscious of the grave issues which face us, we place our trust in the God of our fathers, from whom we seek wisdom and guidance" (Mideast

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Correction to the information provided by the DOL, Vectrus Recycling Team will pick-up the wood water pallets, plastic and cardboard throughout Camp Arifjan and Camp Buehring. Units can stacked these items next to the dumpsters or coordinate for alternate pickup directly w/ Vectrus.…

    • 75 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This caused an outrage within West Bank and Gaza, which lead to a rebellion known as the intifadah (“Israel”). Stunned by the turn of events, Shamir resurrected the Camp David –era autonomy plan and revolve it around Palestinians. The Palestinians didn’t autonomy and wished for statehood, but that was denied (“Israel”). Fortunately Palestinians gained self-government through the Oslo Accords (“Palestine”). In fact, it was during Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin’s term that the Oslo Accord was established (“Israel”). Rabin’s foreign minister, Shimon Peres, was the person negotiating with the Palestinians via Norwegian diplomacy…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the late 1950s, many Americans built bomb shelters. These structures, also known as fallout shelters, were constructed to protect Americans in the case of a nuclear attack and the fallout that occurs afterwards. Fallout is the radioactive debris that follows a nuclear explosion. If a nuclear attack were to occur, the fallout could reach distances miles away from the center of the explosion. At this time, the United States and the Soviet Union were engaged in the Cold War. The Cold War did not actually involve fighting but was a race of obtaining nuclear weapons and intimidating the opponent. Both sides knew that they could destroy each other in a matter of minutes. For this reason, Americans lived in constant fear of the Soviets bombing the United States.…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leaving Africa Dbq

    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Also, without friendship and peace between countries, the world will never been completely settled. In Source C the Egyptian President Anwar Sadat, United States President Jimmy Carter and Isreali Prime Minister Menachem Begin are all together in the United States to negotiate the treaty, The Camp David Accords. This treaty would be the peaceful way to settle the disputes between Israel and one of the Arab neighbors. The United States was present to help by allowing this treaty to be done is a top secret place known as Camp David. In the picture, all three leaders are smiling, which represents that since the leaders are comfortable and friendly with one another, the countries will be the same way. This form of allies will only benefit the interactions and give leverage to all three countries, since if a time of war is called, any of the countries will know who is reliable when help if needed. Furthermore, the strength of allies is demonstrated in Source D. This document from Marco Polo demonstrates the importance of the unification of countries through the structure of The Palace of Kublai Khan. Polo describes all of the walls in the palace and how each wall is able hold each other up, as well as representations in the palace like knights and birds. These representations can be used to portray the people…

    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After reading this week’s chapters and doing some internet searching, I came across a dispute between Israel and Egypt. The dispute occurred when Egypt terminated its gas deal with Israel. The head of the Egyptian Natural Gas Holding Company has said it has terminated its contract to ship gas to Israel because of violations of contractual obligations, a decision Israel said overshadowed the peace agreement between the two countries.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    To understand the vision of the Oslo Accords, signed in 1993, one must first understand the man whose love of his nation brought him to realize the importance of painful sacrifice to achieve a lasting peace, Israeli Prime Minister…

    • 2047 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the war, hostilities between the Arab countries and Israel did not diminish—in fact, a war of attrition began from that same year, 1967, until 1973. A sort of “cold war” of the Middle East, the significance of this was the unsettling back and forth raids and skirmishes between the Arab League and Israel. The Arabs refused to acknowledge Israel as a country in the Khartoum Negotiations of 1967 and refused to negotiate. Instead, they bided their time until they amassed their forces to…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In 1973 the Arab countries of Egypt and Syria, who were still upset over their humiliating defeat by in Israeli forces during the Six Day War in 1967 planned a military attack on Israel. While their intent was not to destroy the country of Israel, they did want to weaken Israel's power and reclaim the lands that they had lost during the Six Days War. The lands that the Arabs wished to reclaim were the Suez Peninsula and Golan Heights. Israel had stated that they would be willing to return the majority of the lands to both Egypt and Syria keeping for themselves the strategic strongholds of the area. The nations of Syria and Egypt refused Israel’s demands and instead implemented the three no’s. The hostilities between the Arab…

    • 2524 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Richard, Brookhiser. “Press release, (March 2005)."Palestinians and Israelis Disagree on How to Proceed with the Peace Process". Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research " 122.1 (2001): n. pag. U.S. News & World Report. Web.…

    • 1278 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The negotiating parties have been the Israeli government and the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO). The official negotiations are mediated by an international contingent known as the Quartet on the Middle East (the Quartet) represented by a special envoy that consists of the United States, Russia, the European Union, and the United Nations. The Arab League, another important actor, has proposed an alternative peace plan. Egypt, a founding member of the Arab League, has historically been a key participant. The United States has been an ardent supporter of Israel often taking positions against UN Resolutions condemning the actions of Israel. Since 2006, the Palestinian side has been fractured by conflict between the two major factions: Fatah, the largest party, and Hamas. As a result, the territory controlled by the Palestinian National Authority (the Palestinian interim government) is split between Fatah in the West Bank and Hamas in the Gaza strip. Hamas is considered a terrorist organization by Israel and the United States although it won the Palestinian elections of 2006; therefore, it has not been allowed to participate in official negotiations. The Palestinians are an occupied people living in refugee camps often without sufficient food, potable water, electricity, adequate medical care, or work. Peace negotiations began at nnapolis, Maryland, United States, in November 2007. No final solution occurred. The parties agree there are six 'final status' issues which need to be resolved: Jerusalem, refugees, settlements, security, borders and…

    • 2061 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    10. On september 17, Egypt and Isreal signed two agreements, the leader of Egypt was Anwar Sadat and the prime minister Menachem begin.…

    • 384 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Terrorism the New Threat

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages

    3. 3. Some Israelis believe that whenYassir Arafat walked out on negotiations at the Camp David Summit in July 2000, the Second Intifada started then.( 93% of the PLO's demands were approved by PM Ehud Barak and were declined by Arafat.)…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A war that would pit the two superpowers against each other was undesirable because it would reverse the progress of détente and there would not be controls to prevent further escalation of the conflict. Furthermore, the two countries had significant reasons to not start a conflict in the Middle East. The United States was still mired in the domestically unpopular Vietnam War while Brezhnev was pushing for reductions in defense spending. Sadat recognized that unless the situation changed in the Middle East a peace agreement would not be a priority for either the United States or Soviet Union. The situation was unacceptable to Egypt however, because Israeli troops were still occupying the Sinai Peninsula. A war would give Sadat an opportunity to change the balance of power in the region and give him more negotiating leverage in future negotiations for a peace agreement. He subscribed to the theory that his predecessor, Gamal Abdel Nasser, had once told him which was that “‘if we get even 10 cm of the Sinai, and [are able] to entrench there in a way that no power could remove us from there … we will remove the shame that we carried from the 1967 defeat” (Tal, p.748). The need to remove the shame of of 1967 led Sadat to seek a way out from the frozen negotiations and he saw control of the Sinai Peninsula as a way to bring urgency to the issue of a peace agreement. Sadat knew that neither the United States nor Soviet Union wanted a conflict in the region because it would pose a threat to détente. After the start of the war, the two options would be for diplomatic negotiations to begin after Egypt had already gained a more favorable negotiating position or further escalation of a war where Israel and the United States would be fighting against the entire Arab world and the USSR. Even in the case…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Especially, United Arab Republic is one of the countries that needed to explain and put an additional article in the agreements for itself which that article stated that the United Arab Republic and Israel will have no agreements and treats…

    • 1152 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Moreover, after the signing of the Camp David Peace Agreement between Anwar El ‎Sadat, the former President of Egypt, and the Israeli authorities in 1978, Sharm El ‎Sheikh has guided all its political, economical, and touristic capabilities to support ‎peace in the whole region. ‎…

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays