Preview

Bus 351 Research Paper

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2027 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bus 351 Research Paper
Social Contract Between Business & Society in the U.S. by Luther Wilson

Position Paper
9/02/2014

Luther Wilson

Bus 351 – Business, Society and Government
Assignment – Position Paper

The assignment that I chose was: Research and discuss the concept of the social contract between business and society in the U.S. First I had to research what a social contract consisted of. After looking at various companies ideals of social contracts, I came to the conclusion that there is a clear expectation that businesses have an obligation to improve society’s status. The overall consensus is that businesses should have their employee’s interests at heart without having to break any rules of justice in society. Bottom line: as long as the agreements between society and businesses are ethical, their relationship will remain civil. While researching my topic, I read an excerpt from Purity Makandi’s article: “Social Contact Theories in Business”. (The Corporate Contract: Actual or Fictional?) He stated that: “84% of corporate executives believe that society expects businesses to take a more active role
…show more content…
Renowned author Milton Friedman stated that: “The business of business is business”. He believes that society’s interests are in direct contrast to corporate management’s ideologies. In an attempt to promote their own causes and still enlist the support of society, organizations have implemented Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). This concept proves to be a disillusioned attempt by companies that claim to already be practicing CSR, to satisfy campaign groups that insist that they need to do more to mitigate their social issues. As other countries in the world, especially Continental and Central Europe are moving toward the Anglo-Saxon shareholder value model; many debates arise and prove to have global

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    According to Friedman, a ‘good’ corporation is not one that undertakes activities only because they are ethically sound, but because they are economically viable. Milton Friedman argued against spending shareholder’s money for anything that does not directly contribute to increasing shareholder wealth or profit. His main argument stems from his views on what constitutes ethical spending. In other words, he noted that it is not appropriate for a corporate executive or director to embark on social objectives or programs because there is little incentive for prudent expenditure, particularly when one is spending money owed to the shareholders through dividends. In addition, companies should not engage in any charitable activities or dedicate…

    • 147 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Milton Friedman

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Milton Friedman takes the position that corporations cannot be socially responsible, only people can have responsibilities. In continuing with this thought, he then suggest that social responsibility is then directed at the corporate executive of a business, not the business as a whole. The corporate executive has primary responsibility to his employers to conduct business as they see fit, and manage the business to create the most profit while following the “basic rules of society”.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Corporate social responsibility (CSR), corporate governance (CG), corporate citizenship and triple bottom line (TBL) became more or less synonyms for the emerging effort to determine the meaning of ethical business. In broadest sense, all these agendas aim to translate the complexity and holism of business-society interface into organizational realities and operational settings (Lunheim, 2003)…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Friedman vs Drucker

    • 1926 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The concept of business ethics continues to spark wide and varied responses to its very meaning and to its practical application in the daily operations of the corporate enterprise as well. Two noted business authors and leaders, Peter Drucker and Milton Friedman, have expressed differing positions on the role of corporate social responsibility. From Drucker’s writings, it is abundantly clear he believes it is critically important not only how public and private enterprises manage their resources, but also how they operate morally and ethically within a social organizational structure. To this end, he championed the need for businesses to develop core values that emphasize a strong focus on corporate social responsibility, while still maintaining total accountability to the organization. Conversely, Milton Friedman held an opposing view and surmised that a businesses’ primary concern ought to be squarely focused on the maximization of profits, for a corporation cannot be capable of having any kind of social responsibility, as it is not an actual living entity able to entertain such ideals, rather, it exists purely as a mechanism to generate profits for its shareholders. Personally, while I find both views have solid merit, I also believe that between these two arguments are strong ideals that can be taken together from each premise, such that both corporate responsibility objectives can exist, without sacrificing shareholder values or the individual views held by the various stakeholders of the enterprise.…

    • 1926 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this paper we address the question of why forms of business responsibility for society both differ among countries and change within them. We do so by comparative investigation of corporate social responsibility (CSR), historically and contemporarily, in the United States and in Europe.1 The paper is inspired by two commonplace observations. The first observation is that while many U.S. corporations have both been attributed, and ready to claim, social responsibilities, this has not been so common elsewhere. Comparative research in CSR between Europe and the United State has identified remarkable differences between companies on each side of the Atlantic. This pertains, first, to the language companies use in describing their involvement in society. In a comparative study of corporate self-presentaWe thank former associate editor Thomas Donaldson and the anonymous reviewers for their input and support in developing the manuscript. We acknowledge constructive comments from Eva Boxenbaum, Thomas Dunfee, JeanPascal Gond, and Atle Midttun on earlier versions. We have presented these ideas at conferences, workshops, and seminars too numerous to mention. We would like to thank all those who contributed to the development of our argument. 1 By Europe, we refer to Scandinavia, the Benelux countries,…

    • 13324 Words
    • 54 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    For many decades, corporate social responsibility (CSR) has been viewed as a waste of resources – money, labor, time, etc. – which conflicts with the firm’s responsibility to make profits in order to compensate its shareholders (Friedman, 1970; Henderson, 2001; Jensen, 2002; Levitt, 1958; Sundaram & Inkpen, 2004). On the contrary, especially during the last years, many supporters of CSR came up with the argument that CSR provides a company with a series of specific benefits that very often will outweigh the expenditures. Some are even of the opinion that CSR is necessary for business, both from an economic and a social point of view (Brown & Fraser, 2006; Drucker, 1984; Kotler & Lee, 2005; Mintzberg, 1983; Porter & Kramer, 2006). Schreck (2011) concludes by writing that the following two related conflicts could be solved by proving that CSR and profit-maximizing interests can go hand in hand: On the one hand, the argument that CSR is just a waste of resources would be invalidated and on the other hand, CSR expenses could be justified to the shareholders as compatible with the firm’s obligations and, thus, legitimate and economically beneficial.…

    • 3043 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Csr Literature Review

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The connection between corporations and society has been to industrialists’ mind since the age of Henry Ford, if not before but the first effort to theorize this relationship has been made by Howard Bowen’s Social Responsibilities of the Businessman (1953) who tried to give systematic and rationalized arguments in favor of CSR by stating that the big corporations should consider using their power and influence with social consequences and responsibilities in mind. The main argument to this point came by Milton Friedman (1962) who argued that the “only responsibility of a corporation is to its shareholders”. Academics were divided between the two arguments for a decade without advancing a lot the debate.…

    • 462 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Modern management theories are focussed on how individuals contribute to organisation and corporate performance while the performance of the chief executive is dictated by the organisation’s financial returns and share price. While organisations espouse the principles associated with total quality management, learning organisations, high performance organisations and implement balanced score cards, the chief executive’s primary focus is fixated on retaining control of the organisation to meet shareholder expectations. As we enter the new millennium the corporate world has been rocked by the scandals involving Enron, Worldcom and Adelphia in the USA and in Europe by Parmalat and Mannesmann. These, and a host of other organisations, have been publicly criticised for fraudulent accounting practises or excessive personal gain for the chief executive and senior members of the administration while creating a financial catastrophe for employees and shareholders. The public no longer trusts the corporate world. The World Economic Forum’s (2004) global surveys on trust in 2004 and 2002 indicate that people’s trust levels in global and large domestic companies remain very low with less than 10 per cent of respondents reporting “a lot of trust” in these institutions operating in the best interests of society. (The results for 2004 show some improvement over 2002.) In Europe, the concept of corporate social responsibility (CSR) is the subject of many boardroom discussions and in the USA the Dow Jones publishes a CSR index on the premise that many investors believe firms who practice social responsibility provide better long term financial returns. The intent of CSR is to add value to society, to leave the world in a better position for our grandchildren by building environmental and social responsibilities into the traditional economic equation. Proponents of CSR claim that this approach will restore public…

    • 8523 Words
    • 35 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Poverty cause of revolution.

    • 6228 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Much of our discipline as business and society scholars is devoted to an exploration of the role the business community does and should play within the greater society of which it is such an important part. Specifically, we focus on the relationship among the business, civil society, and governmental sectors, and on the interdependence and interconnectedness of those three entities (e.g. [10] Lussier and Sherman, 2009; [21] Steiner and Steiner, 2006).…

    • 6228 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    business ethics

    • 319 Words
    • 1 Page

    Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is now on the global agenda. The USA, the European Union (EU) and a number of developing countries are all looking to corporations to help address issues such as inequality, health and unemployment. CSR is based on the concept of ‘stakeholder democracy’, which is premised on the notion that organisations are made up of a number of different stakeholders with a multiplicity of interests, all of whom should have an influence over the organisation’s activities. This concept is supposed to preclude the privileging of any one interest above the rest (Zadek 2001). However, the question remains of how much influence different stakeholders will have in practice. Thompson & McHugh (1995) suggest that stakeholder democ- racy is fundamentally unrealistic about the distribution of decision-making power inside organisations, because it is the owners who hold the key ‘stakes’ in the organisation and ultimately it will be their interests that predominate. Zadek (1993) also argues that shareholder interests are always likely to predominate, favouring financial over non-financial outcomes, with markets tend- ing to reward bad rather than good behaviour,…

    • 319 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In chapter one the author lays a foundation for the information which will be shared in the following chapters. This foundation allows the reader to understand basic terminology, ideas, and relationships as it pertains to the operation of business, government and society. For a more distinct explanation of what the author helps the reader to understand; the collaborative information that the chapter provides illustrates a somewhat intangible relationship, in which we (business, government, and society) all are stakeholders. The author helps the reader understands the interactions of the stakeholders, and these interactions shape how business’ assumes social responsibility; whether it is self imposed, dictated by law/regulation, or pressured by social values, ideas, and expectations. The author then offers four definitive relational models which helps the reader understand the multiple variables which help shape and control the relationship between business and society. In addition, the models also help the reader to understand the effects, the value added, and the challenges that are imposed on those parts of society which assume them. One interesting thought for the reader to keep in mind when learning the four models is how the nature of the models can vary based local and national politics, market maturity, and social structure.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Friedman, M. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits. New York Times Magazine. p32–33.…

    • 3936 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is growing recognition of the significant effect the activities of the private sector have—on employees, customers, communities, the environment, competitors, business partners, investors, shareholders, governments and others. It is also becoming increasingly clear that firms can contribute to their own wealth and to overall societal wealth by considering the effect they have on the world at large when making decisions. Business opinion polls and corporate behaviour both show increased levels of understanding of the link between responsible business and good business. Also, investors and financial markets are beginning to see that CSR activities that integrate broader societal concerns into business strategy and performance are evidence of good management. In addition to building trust with the community and giving firms an edge in attracting good customers and employees, acting responsibly towards workers and others in society can help build value for firms and their shareholders.…

    • 2369 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Comm Reflective Essay

    • 2354 Words
    • 10 Pages

    8. Shaw, et al., Moral Issues in Business, 1st Edition (Cengage Learning Australia Pty Ltd, 2009)…

    • 2354 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Corporate social Responsibility (CSR) is now widely accomplished in business. The term CSR is a process with the aim to embrace responsibility for the company’s actions and encourage a positive impact through its activities on the environment. In another word, CSR is the responsibility that business organisations have towards stakeholders to behave responsibility and ethically. (Worthington and Patton, 2013) In business, the main purpose of a company is maximizing their profit, which involves the shareholders’ interest. However, the CSR policies could directly affect the shareholders’ interest. This essay will examine the reason why CSR policies is complicit with the shareholders’ interest and why organisations still implement the policies in this situation in terms of the long-term profit and the environment issues.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays