Preview

Bumper Sticker Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
977 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bumper Sticker Analysis
Title

I find this bumper sticker to be offensive because it is speaking to the blue collared workers but there are also people who work extremely hard but still are on welfare. This shows poor understand in on the reason for earning money and people on welfare. This bumper sticker would be more accurate if it said corporate welfare depends on you. Opponents of welfare argue against welfare on numerous grounds. There are those who think welfare has gone too far because it is very expensive, reduces incentivesfor economic initiative, counterproductive, depresses general economic growth and may cause an unsustainable debt burden. Generally it can be boiled down to the simple idea that welfare is economically inefficient. One argument against welfare is that it take away incentive of the unemployed or, otherwise the unfortunate, to get back on their feet again. Instead of seeking employment the individual will look forward to receiving benefit checks. Such a system not only leads to the satisfactory of subsidized idleness but it also places an unfair burden on workers who must pay the program. According to the Health Care Pro Con website, their argument is that the constitution promises “life , liberty and the pursuit of happiness including access to health care and other services is contingent on the individuals pursuit of it by his hard work, and not guaranteed insurance and or a welfare check according to this philosophy. Indeed, one of this worldviews tenets is that hardworking individuals should not be forced to take financialaccountability for those who does not take responsibility for themselves. A con of welfare says that society should hold the individual responsible for their own actions and their consequences. If the action results in the drop of their wellbeing that should be a personal responsibility and they should take the brunt of the repercussions. “if society is responsible for everything then no one is personally responsible for anything,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In many people’s mind the welfare system is being abused in negative ways and instead of helping the ones in need it is being used for the wrong purpose. People are becoming lazy and are not motivated to work. This causes disagreements within society because there are people who work hard and pay their taxes to basically maintain the lazy people who take advantage of it and misuse it. On the other hand, many people find the welfare program to be helpful to those family who receive a lower income, families with a single parent and famiies who overall struggling…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The United States welfare system has been full of flaws since it was created. Some presidents such as Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton have pushed for some kind of welfare reform. In Regan’s “Welfare Reform” speech he called for a “reshape of our welfare system so that it can be judged by how many how many Americans it makes independent off welfare.” (President Ronald Reagan speaks on welfare reform). From when he started running for office, he was not a firm believer in the welfare system the United States was running. Reagan also believed that if changed were not made it would create “a permanent culture of poverty as inescapable as any chain or bond” (President Ronald Reagan speaks on welfare reform). Even liberals, such as former President Bill Clinton, believed a reform for welfare was necessary. His most known contribution to the welfare reform was the “passing of a sweeping reform bill in 1996” (The Clinton Presidency). Clinton came up with a welfare reformation bill which was considered his biggest contribution to welfare reform than any other president in the last decade of the twentieth century. The “Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Act” that Clinton passed “ required welfare recipients to find jobs and aimed to move poor people off welfare and into the work place” (The Clinton Presidency). Attempts to…

    • 1233 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Welfare is a government program that provides money, medical care, food, housing, and other things that people need in order to survive. People who can receive help from these welfare programs are children, elders, the disabled, and others who cannot support their families on their current income. The welfare program has gone from a well-meaning program designed to sustain people who are unable to work and provide for their children, to a program that has become counterproductive to eliminating the unending dependence of the recipients. It must be understood that the welfare system, as we know it, must be fixed over a long period of time; but unfortunately there are no quick fixes.…

    • 796 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Myths About the Poor

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Wrong, most people who are counted as “poor” don’t get any public assistance at all because they don’t qualify. Those who do mostly receive some kind of food assistance, but only if they are severely disabled or have children.. I personally believe that welfare does not subsidize the poor; it subsidizes the employers who refuse to pay an equitable wage.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    the system and should not be entitled to benefits. This is true but not all welfare people…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Welfare is supposed to be good and helpful but it’s being seen as wasteful, not worth it by others, and simply has other issues that the government is in need of solving. It is supposed to be helping people such as single mothers get back on their feet, however many are abusing this help and having more children to continue receiving welfare money for a long period of time. People are not supposed to be on welfare for a long period of time, this program was meant to help people out temporarily so they could get back to work and provide for themselves, soon though, not years later (wikipedia). However, it is making some people lazier by getting money just to sit at home and do nothing. Some people are not motivated to get a job, or simply do not want a job and would prefer to live on welfare for years…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    When people think about welfare they normally think of Medicaid, WIA Work Investment Act, WIC Women, Infants, and Children and of course AFDC Aid to Families with Dependent Children now TANF, and HUD Housing and Urban Development. They tend to view it as the federal government giving away the countries money and the tax payers hard earned dollars to people who can’t support themselves. Most people do not like the idea regardless of what and some are sympathetic to the poor and think you should help if you can and are financially stable. They may wonder why they can’t support themselves, why don’t they work or go to school, why they are having all these children they can’t take care of. These reasons may vary. They could be a widow or lost their spouse, they could have been laid off from their jobs, or maybe their hours were cut as there could be many other explanations, but there are programs to help people get back into the swing of things such as training seminars, workshops, help with schooling and finding jobs as well as day care assistance, nutritional programs, finding housing and other needs.…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    I agree with the conservative view on welfare more than the moderate view. There are several reasons behind my opinion. Although, I agree that the needy families, single parents, and other in need should be helped financially, but I few issues regarding this. First of all, there should exist a tough procedure and valuation in order to get the welfare. The welfare shouldn't be available as the first thing to anyone who is in need and he/she has dependents. Instead, they should check out other opportunities before getting themselves into welfare. Although these people should be given welfare but should have some sort of penalty along with it.…

    • 686 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While working and earning an income is a great feeling, the benefits are not as good as receiving welfare. Many people receiving welfare cannot find a job that could replace the checks. Some individuals on welfare take part time jobs, thus causing their situation to be not as severe and reducing the amount their welfare check is for. For…

    • 9679 Words
    • 39 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Our debt is going to consume the nation in the future and welfare is just one of the…

    • 643 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Welfare Reform

    • 3199 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Welfare: handouts to the lazy, or a helping hand to those facing hard times? The debate continues, even in the face of sweeping welfare reform, which, for all of its sound and fury, has not helped or changed much. What's wrong with welfare and how can we fix it? This is not a simple question, and there is no simple answer. However, one thing remains eminently clear. Welfare desperately needs to change. But where are we now? Are we headed backward or forward? Does anybody even care? To answer these questions, we must catch a glimpse of the world of welfare.…

    • 3199 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    As mentioned before, a welfare state aims to aid those who are unable to establish a good live for themselves or their children. Although there are many European countries that provide welfare programs to their citizens, most welfare systems in these countries have several significant similarities. For example, welfare states in Europe attempt to commit to full employment, social protections for all citizens, social inclusion, and democracy. Because social welfare states in Europe attempt to reach specific goals, they have programs in place such as free health care and education that the United States does not. These programs in European welfare states often do meet the goals they were meant to reach and cause a significant amount of positive impacts in these…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    American conservatives feel the welfare system, as we know, needs to be completely dismantled, or in the least, restructured with extreme limitations on who can receive benefits and how benefits are used. The good intentions of welfare advocates have over burdened American citizens with perhaps the heaviest burden placed upon the ones they intended to help the most. Liberals would suggest the wealthiest of Americans should bare a larger burden than those who have less. This has been a theme for the current extreme Liberal party but an overall shift in American social policy has moved towards dismantling welfare with the goals to bring its participants into the mainstream economy. Why should Americans be held hostage by a social experiment started several generations ago by leaders, who themselves, had reservations about the establishment of a womb-to-tomb welfare system? Franklin Roosevelt observed:…

    • 2288 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Since Franklin D. Roosevelt established the welfare state, it has been both heavily criticized and supported. The first source is a quote from a book called Freedom and the Welfare State, which provides an argument on just why they believe the welfare state is for the best of society. The source explains that a person simply cannot be free if they are burdened by “fear and insecurity” and that such fear and insecurity might be brought on by specific problems society has that can be addressed by the welfare state. The author argues that “the welfare state is simply a state in which people are free”, as if they believe the welfare state is necessary to ensure individual freedom to “develop individual capacities”. The quoter of the source is likely…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    To understand the “Welfare System” one must know its history. The American welfare system has changed dramatically over the past 80 years. A 100 years ago, families, local communities, and charities; typically religious based, served as the safety net for those who had fallen on hard times. The Great Depression of the 1930s would see a change in social policy with the passing of President Roosevelt’s “New Deal” establishing Social Security and Aid to Dependent Children (ADC.) Thus was born the American Welfare System. The U.S. welfare system stayed in the hands of the federal government for the next sixty-one years. Many Americans were unhappy with the welfare system, claiming that individuals were abusing the welfare programs by not applying for jobs, having more children just to get more aid, and staying unmarried so as to qualify for greater benefits. Further expansion came with the Johnson’s administration in the 1960s with the establishment of Medicare, Medicaid, Public Housing, and other programs. During the Reagan presidency it was claimed that mothers with infants should not be allowed to become dependent on the welfare system, and that providing assistance for children under one year of age constituted such “dependency” The welfare system remained relatively unchanged till 1996 when President Clinton signed a sweeping welfare reform law that is still a hot topic of public controversy today. When Clinton was elected he had the intention of changing the welfare system. In 1996 the Republican Congress passed a reform law signed by President Clinton that gave the control of the welfare system back to the states. Conservatives claim a dramatic decline in welfare…

    • 2048 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays