Preview

Brief

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
511 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Brief
Elizabeth Covington, who was sixty-five years old when her husband died, needed as much money as she could muster, decided to have a garage sale. Her husband had a baseball card collection but Elizabeth knew nothing about baseball or baseball cards. She displayed the cards along with many other items. Michael Ferrell, and eighteen year old, who lived in the neighborhood, attended the sale. What caught his eye was the baseball card collection and, specifically what appeared to be a 1952 Topps Mickey Mantle rookie baseball card in near mint condition. On the outside of the box container was a sticker indicating “All cards $1 each.” He couldn’t believe his eyes. He had heard that a similar Mantle card had sold in 2006 for $72,000. He thought about telling Mrs. Covington the real value but decided against it and paid her the $1 and left. Later that month, while she was watching her favorite public television show, she saw Michael asking the antiques expert to estimate the value of the card. The expert said that even in a tough economy the card would likely bring $80,000 at public auction. Mrs. Covington brings an equitable action to rescind the contract, get her card back and return the $1 to Michael.

Case: Elizabeth Covington vs. Michael Ferrell (2010)

Facts: Elizabeth Covington versus Michael Ferrell. Plaintiff: Elizabeth Covington brings an equitable action movement to court against Michael Ferrell to receive legal relief for Michael Ferrell having made false representations and concealing material facts from her thus, not acting fairly. Defendant: Michael Ferrell believes that because of Elizabeth Covington’s oblivion of the card, the card is rightfully his own asset and reserves the right to conduct whatever business agreement with it that he chooses. No appellate court decisions.

Issue: Does Elizabeth Covington reserve the right to rescind the contract of the purchase of the baseball card, get the card back, and return the $1 to defendant Michael

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    july at the multiplex

    • 1380 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Ethical: The litigation by Tommy was propelled by the lack of quality customer service on Royal Theater’s behalf. This case does not need to proceed and can be resolved by making small adjustments to Royal Theater’s policies.…

    • 1380 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    ISSUES: Whether or not the Trial court’s final summary judgment in favor of Brown Realty Company will proceed for the reason that Donnie McGraw argues that the trail court erred when they granted Brown motion for traditional summary judgment on its breach of contract.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Siegel v. New England Merchants National Bank, 386 Mass. 672, 437 N.E.2d 218, Web 1982…

    • 339 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    ISSUE: (One or two sentences about what the case is trying to answer – should be in the form of a question). Were the actions of Mrs. Mitchell constituted misconduct under § 59-90-5(b), N.M.S.A.1953?…

    • 340 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    127 (1979), a case where Brown sued Felsen in state court for money allegedly obtained through fraud in which a consent decree was entered that stipulated that Felsen would pay Brown a specified amount but didn’t indicate the payment was for fraudulent actions. Felsen failed to pay and entered into bankruptcy; Brown asked that the debt be held nondischargeable because it was for money obtained by fraud. The Supreme Court in that case held that claim preclusion did not prevent the Bankruptcy Court from looking beyond the record of the state court proceeding and the stipulation and consent judgment to decide whether the debt was for money obtained by fraud. In its new Archer ruling, the Supreme Court states that the Brown holding is…

    • 641 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The case is about a stockholder named Shlensky who is suing the board of directors of Wrigley Field on the grounds of failure to install lights at the stadium. This is a claim of mismanagement and negligence by the directors. At the time of the case, The Chicago Cubs were the only major league team without lights on their stadium. Mr. Wrigley, the principal owner of the team, refused to add lights onto the stadium because he felt that, "baseball is a daytime sport and it would greatly deteriorate the surrounding neighborhood if lights were installed." The plaintiff (Shlensky) was upset that the organization waslosing money. Shlensky argued that the loss amounted to poor attendance and no night games. He further said that…

    • 2130 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plaintiff V. Case Brief

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Procedural History: Plaintiff brought suit against defendant for fraud and breaches of warranty. Summary judgement granted in favor of defendant by the District Court. Plaintiff appealed claiming genuine issues of material facts exist.…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To: Plaintiff Justin King and his attorney, Jane Doe, 123 Main Street, Chicago, IL 60601…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Joseph Kly met Walter and Helen Pestinikas in the latter part of 1981 when Kly consulted them about prearranging his funeral. In March, 1982, Kly, who had been living with a stepson, was hospitalized and diagnosed as suffering from Zenker's diverticulum, a weakness in the walls of the esophagus, [***4] which caused him to have trouble swallowing food. In the hospital, Kly was given food which he was able to swallow and, as a result, regained some of the [**1342] weight which he had lost. When he was about to be discharged, he expressed a desire not to return to his stepson's home and sent word to appellants that he wanted to speak with them. As a consequence, arrangements were made for appellants to care for Kly in their home on Main Street in Scranton, Lackawanna County.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    dynamic business law

    • 761 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Identify the parties involved in the case dispute (who is the plaintiff and who is the defendant).…

    • 761 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case brief

    • 593 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Issues: 1) Whether the district court erred in concluding that hay is not a “product “for purposes of a strict liability in tort cause of action. 2) Whether the District Court erred in concluding that the Rothings negligence claim against Kallestad fails because it was unforeseeable that the hay could cause injury and death to the Rothings’ horses, thus no duty of care existed. 3) Whether the District Court erred in concluding that the Rothings’ breach of contract claim against Kallestad fails because it was unforeseeable that the hay could cause injury and death to the Rothings’ horses. 4) Whether the District Court erred in imposing discovery sanctions against the Rothings. 5) Whether the District Court erred in awarding attorney’s fees to Kallestad and denying the Rothings a hearing in respect to the calculation of attorney’s fees. (₱3-7)…

    • 593 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Keegan, T. (2012). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. v. Kirtsaeng. New York Law School Law Review,…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Business Law Quiz

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Bob has a dispute with Ace Company over a perceived product defect. Bob hires a lawyer and after discussing the facts and issues, Bob’s attorney agrees to file a lawsuit against Ace.…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    U.s. vs prince

    • 2122 Words
    • 9 Pages

    * After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.…

    • 2122 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Parody Productions, LLC is a company that sale his playing cards over the internet. The product portrays well-known players from a sports team's history. The plaintiff in this suit, Ronald Swoboda, is included in the New York Mets Hero Deck. Swoboda claims that he has never given Parody permission to use his image. He further contends that through his attorney he sent Parody a cease and desist letter. Parody refused to stop selling cards with Swoboda's name and images. In response, Swoboda filed the instant lawsuit to enjoin Parody from the continued use of his name and likeness and for damages for violating his right to publicity, and, alternatively, damages for unjust enrichment. The trial court sustained the exception of lack of personal jurisdiction and this appeal followed.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics