Brazhnyk Human Rights
Human rights frequently collide and intertwine. Therefore, in this paper we consider the way the collision of human rights to economic development and human rights to a healthy environment. This essay will argue that the right to a healthy environment and right to economic development can be compatible, but this requires sustainability of society, economy, and politics. Before we will know in what ways these rights may collide, we will look at what those rights are guaranteed, after let us examine the examples of how these rights can harm each other or exist peacefully with each other.
Modern world enables people to develop freely and exercise their rights determined and fixed as international law and the law of each country. Jurisprudence distinguishes three generations of human rights, due to their historical development and formation, which according to the first-generation rights are those associated with liberal values of society and include civil and political rights. They were enshrined at the global level and given status in international law first by Articles 3 to 21 of the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights and later in the 1966 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (Waldron, 1993). The second- generation rights are rights related to human social existence and implementation of economic rights. Like first-generation rights, they were also covered by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and further embodied in Articles 22 to 28 of the Universal Declaration, and the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights. This facts draws attention to the difference between the first and second generation rights, it is that the first generation is the generation is called "negative rights", implemented by man and are protected from interference, while the second generation is a generation of "positive rights" for implementation of which requires active involvement of the state. The third generation of human rights,
Modern world enables people to develop freely and exercise their rights determined and fixed as international law and the law of each country. Jurisprudence distinguishes three generations of human rights, due to their historical development and formation, which according to the first-generation rights are those associated with liberal values of society and include civil and political rights. They were enshrined at the global level and given status in international law first by Articles 3 to 21 of the 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights and later in the 1966 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (Waldron, 1993). The second- generation rights are rights related to human social existence and implementation of economic rights. Like first-generation rights, they were also covered by the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and further embodied in Articles 22 to 28 of the Universal Declaration, and the International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights. This facts draws attention to the difference between the first and second generation rights, it is that the first generation is the generation is called "negative rights", implemented by man and are protected from interference, while the second generation is a generation of "positive rights" for implementation of which requires active involvement of the state. The third generation of human rights,
Bibliography: Beitz, C. (2009). The idea of human rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Lawson, E. (1991). Encyclopedia of human rights. New York: Taylor & Francis. News.bbc.co.uk, (2000). BBC News | EUROPE | Death of a river. [online] Available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/642880.stm [Accessed 7 Dec. 2014]. Wikipedia, (2014). 2000 Baia Mare cyanide spill. [online] Available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2000_Baia_Mare_cyanide_spill [Accessed 7 Dec. 2014]. Waldron, J. (1993). Liberal rights. Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press.