Preview

Boston Massacre Research Paper

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1526 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Boston Massacre Research Paper
The Boston Massacre, was the first bloodshed between the British and the American colonists, which ultimately lead to war between the two. Here, I will discuss the events leading up to the Massacre, which the hostilities of the colonial people will be discussed. I believe that the British troops fired the first shot, but were ultimately lead to this point through the colonists antagonization. I have broken this paper down into two main pieces. The first will be the events that lead to the Boston Massacre happening. The second will be the accounts of Captain Preston, and the Paul Revere engraving. The political events leading up to the Boston Massacre started with unfair taxes. The first tax, in which George Greenville, the new prime …show more content…
With 15,000 people in Boston along with 4,000 was a little more than a 4 to 1 ratio of Bostonians to the British troops. You simply couldn’t go a few feet without seeing a troop walking around where in town. Troubling things started to happen because of such intensity that will lead to the Boston Massacre.
The people of Boston were not very fond of Captain Preston and his British troops. “It is [a] matter of too great notoriety to need any proofs that the arrival of his Majesty 's troops in Boston was extremely obnoxious to its inhabitants.” ()
Captain Preston’s accounts state that on Monday night at 8 o’clock, two soldiers were attacked and that at about 9, his troops came to him and said the townspeople were planning an attack on his troops. The town bells were ringing, which usually signifies firing. These bells, were instead used to gather people from the countryside to the city. He then walked to his guard, and there he saw about 100 walking towards the custom house where the king’s money was stored. He was informed by a townsmen that their intention was to carry off the guard and murder him. So, in defense, he sent a non-commissioned officer and 12 soldiers to defend the king’s money. Soon, he too came to the custom house to prevent any type of aggression. A mob surrounded him, and the mob was instigating the troops to fire, swearing at them, calling them all sorts of names. As Preston got in between
…show more content…
They were beaten with sticks and pelted with snowballs. Colonists were provoking the soldiers into firing, and instantly, three or four troops fired at the colonists. One colonist was dead, three were hurt, and four were severely hurt. Preston again claimed he told the soldiers not to fire, but some mistakenly thought he meant to fire. After this, on the next street, 4 to 5000 people assembled ready to take the British troops lives. Captain Preston then told his troops to the main guard, where the streets were narrow and told them to expect an attack. He heard the colonists drums going, so he told his troops to drum as well. Preston and Colonel Carr agreed that the troops should return to their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Document 3: How does the engraving tell a different story from the above description of the Boston Massacre?…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though the British referred to the Continental Army as a “rabble in arms” (McCullough 25), the author carefully paints his story to show how the colonists were prepared to defeat the British. He does so by mentioning the fact that the size of the Continental Army was twice the size of the British Army that was occupying Boston: “[T]here were perhaps 7,000 of the King’s men in Boston, or roughly half the number under Washington’s command.” (McCullough 25). Although the British troops were better trained and had more experience than the volunteers who were a part of the American army, the multitude in number was still a notable quality of Washington’s men that foreshadowed their ultimate victory.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rise to Rebellion, by Jeff Shaara, is the first volume to Shaara's two-part chronicle of the entire American Revolution; starting with the events of the Boston Massacre in March of 1770 and ending with the signing of The Declaration of Independence in 1776. Shaara attempts to relate to us the events as if each character he focuses on is telling the reader the story directly. In attempting to do this Shaara provides us with personal experiences, thoughtful dialogue, and what the characters are thinking- but these must be thought of as fiction. Shaara included these to give the book more depth, not to be historically accurate to the last words of dialogue. For example, there is no way anyone can know for sure what the…

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Boston massacre was the first battle of the american revolution. Paul Revere wanted to get more people to be on their side so that they could go to war with Britain to gain their freedom. So that they didn’t have to by the tea that went along with the tea act passed by parliament.…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On March 5, 1770, British soldiers were badgered to the point of outrage by a small group of boys (Wheeler and Becker, 75). The soldiers eventually retaliated at the group and the church bells started ringing alarming the town that a fire had broken out only leading the numbers in the crowd to increase (Wheeler and Becker, 75). Captain Thomas Preston and his sentry were called to the scene to assist. However, their attempts to redirect the crowd were unsuccessful. It is at this point that a musket was fired and the situation continued to escalate leaving some dead and others wounded (Wheeler and Becker, 75). Was Captain Thomas Preston guilty of murder by ordering his soldiers to fire? Or was he innocent and the soldiers fired out of provocation and their own volition?…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The very next day we were told to leave the Boston by the Gov.Hutchinson .All the people of the Boston came on the street to insult and curse us .On march 13, the colony attorney general issued 13 indictments for murder. We were accused that the murder was all planned and all of us had revenge in hearts. In March 6 a warrant was issued for the arrest of Captain Thomas Preston and the officer in charge of the troops who did the shooting .Me and other seven soldiers under Preston’s command were clapped into prison later the same day. In a particular witness testified that one or two weeks before shooting , Pvt Killroy had said that “ he would never miss an opportunity ,if he had one to fire on the Boston people .…

    • 650 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Boston Massacre was an unfortunate event which could have clearly been prevented if taken the right precautions and made the right decisions at the right time. According to my text book, the massacre was an attempt at protest against the British soldiers taking over the colonists’ jobs. If the soldiers had followed instructions, if Britain had paid the soldiers more, and if Crispus Attucks had taken a more peaceful approach to this problem, things might’ve gone differently.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The colonists were throwing snowballs, sticks, and even stones at the soldiers. Furious the soldiers fired into the group of people, at that piont 3 people were killed and 8 people were badly injured. So, Captain Thomas Preston was taken on a trail there, John Adams and Josiah Quincey defend Captain Preston…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Boston Massacre was a crucial event that occurred on March 5th, 1770. At this point in history, tension was high between the British forces and angry colonists. People of the 13 colonies began to become outraged at Britain for passing unfair laws, such as taxes on goods like tea and paper. A group of men whom had lost their jobs and blamed the British gathered around the Customs House in a riot. Eight British soldiers stood their ground in front of the protesters, both sides becoming more and more outraged at each other. The event quickly escalated after young Edward Garrick is hit with the back of a soldier’s firearm. Private Hugh Montgomery is hit with a club and is the first to fire at the colonists, despite Captain Thomas Preston’s command not to shoot. More men are killed as people began to back away from the scene. The Boston Massacre ends with 5 patriots dead and 6 wounded. As the Independence Hall Association says, “The Boston Massacre was a signal event leading to the Revolutionary War.” The colonists were fed up with Britain and acted on their anger without thinking about what could’ve and did happen. The soldiers ignored their orders not to shoot and turned a riot into a massacre that led to the Revolutionary War. Had both sides controlled their rage and not acted without considering the consequences, the death of 5 people would have been…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the French and Indian war, British parliament executed several laws that seemed unfair to the colonists in order to recover from the expensive war. Laws consisted of housing British troops and paying taxes on items like tea, sugar, stamps, etc. The British government argued that the best option was to raise taxes on colonists. On march 5th, 1770 colonists reached a critical point in which they felt the need to take violent actions towards the mother country. On this particular day colonists opened fire against the British troops which became known as the Boston massacre or the incident on king street. News regarding the incident spread throughout the colonies via letters or images like Paul revere’s popular depiction of the Boston massacre.…

    • 253 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pro Colonist View

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There are two popular views of the Boston Massacre, the pro-colonist view and the pro-British view. Neither of the views are entirely accurate, the true events of that night are found in the ‘middle ground’ of the accounts. No matter how truthful one account is believed to be, it is impossible for it to be entirely accurate because they couldn't know the intent of the opposing side.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Later after the Massacre still on March 5, 1770 a mob of American colonists gathers at the Customs House in Boston and begins taunting the British soldiers guarding the building. Well I know that the colonist probably shouldn’t have rebelled like that afterwards, but you would have to think if someone you knew and loved got killed you would be pretty mad and would probably do something like that in that time. It would not help if you did not…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1767, British soldiers were sent to Boston to keep order. There was high tension between the British soldiers and the colonists. At 9'o clock at night, a fight broke out and 5 colonists were killed. The Boston Sons of Liberty called the event the Boston Massacre. Historians wondered if the Boston Massacre was an act of self defense by the soldiers or if the soldiers murdered the colonists. After further investigation on this topic, I propose that the British soldiers murdered the colonists.…

    • 227 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On March 5, 1770 shots fired out through the city, leaving five dead, more wounded, and soldiers that were charged of murder. This was called the Boston Massacre a huge turning point in the colonies. Although most people thought the soldiers were guilty I think they aren’t. I will prove from the testimony and eyewitness accounts that the soldiers should not be charged with murder and they acted only in self-defense.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This event actually helped the colonists have more of a reason to fight against England. It helped them because it made them stronger and more angeryer at the British. The colonists were done with the british and they did not care what happened to them, they wanted revenge for killing their family members. The outcome for the British was that they learned that the colonists are very powerful with weapons or no weapons. They also learned that these kinds of incidents have the right to be punished. The British soldiers were punished for doing this to the…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays