Times outlines the major concerns surrounding the use of police body cameras. The article stresses two of the major scrutinies, privacy and the lack of official policy. With regard to issues over privacy, especially in cases involving domestic violence or rape victims, many worry the body cameras will not be used for their intended purpose; to capture events from an officers point of view. One Police Chief from Grand Junction, Colorado, John Cramper, remains torn. He wants citizens to feel free to talk to his officers as a trusted confidant and fears people will not be as open while being recorded on camera. Cramper, among other experts on the issue, strongly suggests that victims and witnesses should only be filmed with their explicit consent. Another notable skeptic, Missouri state Rep. Jeff Roorda, with regard to dashboard cameras states, “Instead of the cameras being there to protect officers, they get disciplined for petty stuff constantly…” Another legitimate concern expressed in the article is the issue concerning the lack of policy. “Faced with the challenge of striking a balance between transparency and privacy for citizens U.S. law enforcement agencies have not adopted a uniform policy for body cameras…” The article cites a recent federal survey of 63 law enforcement agencies across the country implemented the use of body cameras in the police force. The report states that nearly a third of these agencies have no…