Preview

Bloody Sunday: Dramatic Role In The Collapse Of Tsardom

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
366 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bloody Sunday: Dramatic Role In The Collapse Of Tsardom
Nicholas’ autocratic ruling of Russia further accelerated his downfall.
The events of “Bloody Sunday” also played a dramatic role in the collapse of Tsardom. “Bloody Sunday” which was originally meant to be a peaceful protest by disgruntled steel workers in St. Petersburg took a twisted turn of events which forever tarnished the name of Tsar Nicholas II. Angered by the poor working conditions and the on-going war with Japan, thousands marched towards the Winter Palace to plead with the Tsar for reform. As the Tsar was not present at the time, panicky soldiers gunned down workers on the streets. The mass killings of dissident civilians possibly frightened the rest of the population into silent obedience, but would not have changed the fact that

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Over the Eastern Front, the German general Hindenburg and his chief of staff Ludendorff devised strategies that gave them many victories over Russian armies. The war became increasing unpopular among the Russian people. Ludendorff, sensing a chance to take Tsar Nicholas II’s country out of the world war, arranged for an exiled Marxist revolutionary named Lenin to cross Europe in a special train and get back into Tsar’s country Russia. As expected, Lenin helped fan the rising revolutionary sentiments. The Tsar was prosecuted. For the first time in Russian history a democracy formed, but its leaders overlooked the people’s resistance to continuing the war. When the newly elected government could not bring peace, it was overthrown in November…

    • 134 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Like his father, Nicholas was prepared by his tutor Constantine Pobedonostsev, an extreme nationalist, who instilled in Nicholas a stubborn belief in the divine right of kings and absolute power. Many historians such as George F. Kennan, argue that it was this wholehearted belief and upholding of autocracy, which was in fact, the main reason for the March Revolution in 1917. By 1905, the changing needs of the rapidly industrialized Russia were disregarded by Nicholas, who instead ruthlessly repressed any opposition to the government and its’ autocratic system. Nicholas’ heavy censorship and policing developed a huge level of oppression and discontent amongst the Russian public. Protest was met with relentless violence such as the Bloody Sunday incident on the 22ND January 1905. With over 1000 civilians killed by Nicholas’ army, the massacre which came to be known as “Bloody Sunday” highlighted the regime’s brutal approach and the Tsar’s autocratic unwillingness to address the issues of the Russian population. The incident caused a significant decline in the Tsar’s authority, destroying Nicholas’ image as the people’s benevolent father. Bloody Sunday also triggered widespread protest and revolt, which led to the 1905 revolution. The growing resentment towards Nicholas was furthered after his failure to accept the Duma which he promised in…

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    By 1917 most Russians had lost faith in the leadership of Tsar Nicholas II. The first part of the Russian Revolution of 1917 was Russia's terrible involvement in World War I (1914-1918). Militarily, imperial Russia was no match for industrialized Germany, and the Russian death toll was greater than those sustained by any nation in any previous war. ("History.com"). The February Revolution started March 8, 1917 when rioters rioted for bread took to the streets in the Russian capital of Saint Petersburg. Troops were sent to Saint Petersburg to stop the riots; they opened fire and killed the people. In response to the way the riots were being handled Tsar Nicholas II gave up the throne on March 15. The October Revolution or Bolshevik Revolution was led by Vladimir Lenin who launched a nearly bloodless battle against the ad hoc government ("History."). The Bolsheviks and their allies occupied government buildings and other strategic locations in Saint Petersburg, and soon formed a new government with Lenin as its head; he became the virtual dictator of the first Marxist state in the world.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Czar Nicholas II was at the front in February 1917, rallying his troops in World War I, when word arrived of a strike in Petrograd. (Russia’s capital city, St. Petersburg, was renamed Petrograd in 1914.) The czar’s aides in Petrograd assured him that the incident was minor and would end when the bitterly cold weather sent the protestors home. Instead, the strike spread, filling the streets with thousands of angry men and women. The Duma, Russia’s legislature, wrote to the czar that the situation was serious.…

    • 4038 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Nicholas Romanov

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Bloody Sunday was an event that brought attitudes and opinions of hate towards Nicholas II and branded him with the new nickname “bloody Nicholas” which also creates a sense of how the working class felt about their Czar. Bloody Sunday was the massacre of innocent peasants holding a peaceful petition led by father Gapon, outside the winter palace and through the streets of Russia. Peasants marched unarmed and carrying religious symbols on flags hoping that their Czar would show compassion and help his people like a Czar should. This was not the case. The Imperial Guard fired 3 shots before shooting…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nationalism is defined as follows: patriotic feeling, principles, or efforts. The definition suites the aspect of the Russian people of the time, however they felt patriotic towards many separatists, not the Tsar. Nicholas II failed to unit his people under one patriotic belt. After riots of Bloody Sunday, many citizens became loyal to a man named Gapon. Gapon was a “socialist priest” (Warth 88). Gapon further led to the dis-functionality of Nicholas II in WWI by forcing him to focus on riots at home rather than his armies, along with putting workers out of the factories protesting for better conditions. On January 6, 1905, Gapon wrote a petition to Nicholas II that addressed the fact he was unaware of his people’s needs. “The Tsar does not know of our needs, and we will tell him,” (Warth 90) is what Gapon preached to his followers as they roared in confidence for change, further blowing the bubble of Nicholas II’s control closer to the bursting point. On January 19, 1905 after riots got increasingly bloodier and he further dug his whole among his people, Nicholas II proposed a manifesto for workers to “air their complaints” (Warth 99.) As a result, he retracted his idea for a more “monarchy friendly” approach as to receive a deputation of “reliable workers.” This however, led to verbal and physical abuse of the deputies and engulfed mistrust further among the working-class citizens towards the monarchy. With failing to unite his people under the wing of the monarchy, Nicholas II’s armies were feeling the hurt from home. Work related crisis along with food shortages affected not only the production of Russia’s citizens but the might of Nicholas II’s armies. At Tannenberg…

    • 1728 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The year of 1866 can be seen to have been a turning point in the Tsar’s policies becoming more reactionary and reversing many of the changes his reforms had brought. The reforms had been put in place in an attempt to propel Russia out of its increasingly backward state; as much as reforms such as the emancipation of the serfs, greater freedoms and opportunities in education and relaxation of censorship occurred with good intentions, much opposition arose. This came alongside the Tsar’s own personal problems, accompanied by increasing pressure from both events of the time and individuals.…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the ‘Bloody Sunday’ episode – and many other cases after it – clearly showed, during 1905 Revolution the army’s loyalty still belonged to the Tsar and his family. Soldiers would shoot on innocent people at cold blood, and although some occasional mutinies did occur in some units, most of the army only followed the Tsar’s orders. However, with the army’s support on their side, 1917 revolutionaries had a much bigger chance of success. More and more units started doubting the efficiency of the Tsar’s ruling, and refused to do as they were ordered. Unit after unit, the Tsar was losing his most powerful weapon against popular opposition, and soon had to face the fact that the Romanov family’s days were over. It may not seem as obvious and significant an event if we do not take into account the army’s policy that threatened of execution whoever mutinied. The understanding of this law is fundamental to fully comprehend why the Tsar’s loss of loyalty from the Armed Forces was so decisive, because once mutinied soldiers needed this revolution to succeed, and thus did anything in their possibilities to make it a success, otherwise they would have all paid with their…

    • 945 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * The conservative monarchy assassinated Rasputin in December 1916. They shot him three times and then tied him up and threw him in the Neva river…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    This major event is known as Bloody Sunday. A large number of workers were marching to the Tsar's palace in order to present a petition for better working conditions. The Imperial guards at the Tsar's Palace opened fire and killed hundreds of the peaceful protesters. This brutal action caused more rioting and added fuel to the fire of revolution. Worried he might be toppled he approved the creation of the Duma, (a legislative assembly).…

    • 2089 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The death of Ivan

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Selfishness takes part in just about every character in the novella, The Death of Ivan Ilych by Leo Tolstoy. Ivan lych, the protagonist in the story, is a well respected and successful man that makes his way to the top of the social latter after years of hard work and devotion to his job, landing him a spot as magistrate. Everybody seems to have a genuine acquaintance with Ilych before he dies of an incurable illness of floating kidneys. However, they all show their true colors when this wealthy man passes away.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    conditions under the tsar

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Living and working conditions for peasants and workers were terrible. Wages were very low and work hours were very low…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Serfs lived horrible lives and by the 1890’s many were starting to wonder why the tsar had all the wealth and they had none. Some more educated serfs began to think that maybe they should demand that the tsar give them more rights. In 1905 thousands of serfs marched to the palace, believing that the tsar would help them have better lives. Instead the tsar ordered his army to fire into the crowds and many were killed, an event called “bloody Sunday”.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Nationwide Revolution

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In 1905 the massacre of innocent people during a peaceful protest outside the winter palace in St Petersburg sparked the start of a nationwide revolution. This mass murder of the innocent protestors became known as ‘Bloody Sunday’. During the revolution strikes occurred across the nation involving more than 400,000 people, peasants attacked and raided the homes of their landlords and the Tsar’s uncle, the Grand Duke Sergei, was assassinated. Although Bloody Sunday was the immediate reason for the revolution, there were several causes which had caused long term grievances towards the Tsarist regime among the population of Russia leading up to 1905. These include the developments in the countryside and the lives of the peasants, the treatment of the inner-city working class and ethnic minorities, the repression and growth of the political opposition and the impact of the Russo Japanese war. Although all these factors contributed to the initiation of a revolution in Russia, I believe that the attitudes towards and treatment of the working class and the peasants was the most prominent reason for the uprising in 1905.…

    • 1615 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Russian Revolution Causes

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages

    By 1917, Russia was chaotic, the government had been thoroughly corrupted, strikes were rampant and all happening at once. The World War I had begun and Russia was having many casualties due to being ill - equipped against industrialized Germany, and amidst the countries it was the one to receive most damage. Due to the german attacks the Russian economy had been falling apart, and such a situation was only useful to the radicals, as they used it as an opportunity to join with the moderates among other forces, in order to overthrow the Czar and achieve their revolutionary goals. As time passed Russia’s situation only deteriorated, demonstrators and protestants took over the streets, the king’s armies killed many of them, but they still continued to attack full force. Then when an army took the protestants side, the tables flipped, Nicholas II, the Czar at the time was forced to abdicate his throne and so freed Russia of over four centuries of Czarist…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays