Preview

Black Humor

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
896 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Black Humor
Do the wealthy have an obligation to help the poor?

As we enter the millennium, the gap between rich and poor has never been wider. While few people have more money than is possible to spend in a lifetime, a majority is not able to provide even for their most basic needs. 80% of the world’s population lives on less than $10 a day. This situation raises the issue of whether the affluent people of the world have an obligation to help the poor. I say people should be able to relay on others for help. If you have the means to help those impoverished without making huge sacrifice on your own part, then you should help out those in need. Whether you donate once or for the rest of your life, you are doing something that help the lives of others. We should not be bystanders of poverty, otherwise the Bystander Effect will consume humanity. The Bystander Effect is a social psychological phenomenon that refers to cases in which individuals do not offer help to people in need. The probability of help is inversely related to the number of bystanders. In other words, the greater the number of bystanders, the less likely it is that people will help. The Bystander Effect is caused by the idea of Diffusion of Responsibility. Diffusion of Responsibility is when people believe there are other people around, therefore someone else will take the responsibility to help out, leaving them off the hook to help out. We as individuals need to take it upon ourselves to help others and not let the idea of Diffusion of Responsibility consume our minds. We need to squash the Bystander Effect and make it a thing of the past.
Humanity has accidentally allowed this inequality to happen and it is up to us to fix it. As a civilized society, we must ensure those less fortunate are helped, educated, healed and fed. Nearly a billion people entered the 21st century not being able to read or write. We need to change this statistic. Children who are born into vulnerable families do not ask to be born



Cited: * "Quotes About Poverty." (372 Quotes). N.p., n.d. Web. 21 May 2013. <http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/tag/poverty>. * "Quotes About Helping." About.com Quotations. N.p., n.d. Web. 21 May 2013. <http://quotations.about.com/cs/inspirationquotes/a/Helping4.htm>.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The bystander effect is where the bystander doesn’t do anything to help people in need.…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Peter Singer is the author to the “The Singer Solution to World Poverty” article. Singer 's essay argues that there is basically no reason why Americans should not be donating their extra money to those in need. Singer addresses the urgency to donate by appealing to the reader 's sense of ethos, pathos, and logos.…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I was first introduced to Peter Singer’s idea of altruistic poverty at Governor’s School. It suggests that to achieve social and economic equality, individuals have to give away all they have until they reach the poverty line. While trying to wrap my mind around this questionable solution to such a complex issue, I realize that my previous way of thinking had been so egocentric. If I gave everything unnecessary for my survival what would my life look like? However, as this idea unveiled my own inadequacies as an altruistic individual, I began to wonder why capitalism does not encourage this altruism from all economic classes.…

    • 105 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    To give or not to give? This is the central question brought up in “The Singer Solution To World Poverty,” an article written by utilitarian philosopher, Peter Singer. Singer’s “solution” is that Americans need to take all of their money that is not devoted to the basic requirements for life and give it to organizations that are working on saving impoverished children across the globe. In his piece, he uses two imaginary situations to draw a conclusion about the moral position of Americans who do not donate their surplus money to save the poor. In the first, a woman nearly trades a boy’s life for a material possession, and in the second, a man allows a child to be hit by a train in order to save his car. Singer compares these two concocted characters to the unwilling, selfish Americans. He uses these horrific situations to influence his audience’s emotions and make them feel guilty for not donating their extra money; Singer’s accusations make his audience question their ethics and morals by equating them to child murderers. He even goes as far as to say that in order to live a “morally decent” life, we…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Peter Singer thinks we are too selfish with our money. In “The Singer Solution to World Poverty”, he proposes a solution to poverty in other countries. Singer believes that money that might otherwise be used for luxury goods should be donated to charities that help save lives in poorer countries. He believes that this decision increase overall happiness more than the purchase of a luxury good, like new shoes, would. While Singer’s argument raises an important moral point, it leads to a very dangerous moral precedent that could leave the problem worse off than before. Singer’s argument should be taken in a limited scope to help determine right action; otherwise, it becomes a radical doctrine.…

    • 1712 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jon Sabrino and Peter Singer share with readers what it takes to live ethically in a world in which 22,000 children die each day from poverty-related causes. In The Principles of Mercy, Sabrino emphasis that people must no longer turn a naked eye to the problems of the world and they should start living out the gospel. In The Life You Can Save, Singer stresses the importance of giving more money. This paper will first address Sabino’s methods to living ethically, awaking and living the gospel. Then it will cover Singer’s approach the advocates for greater donation of the public.…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    PHI 208 Week 2 assignment

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In Peter Singer’s 1972 post titled “Famine, Affluence and Morality”, he conveys that wealthy nations, for example the United States, has an ethical duty to contribute much a lot more than we do with regards to worldwide assistance for famine relief and/or other disasters or calamities which may happen. In this document, I will describe Singers objective in his work and give his argument with regards to this problem. I will describe 3 counter-arguments to Singer’s view which he tackles, and after that reveal Singer’s reactions to those counter-arguments. I will explain Singer’s idea of marginal utility and also differentiate how it pertains to his argument. I will compare how the ideas of duty and charity alter in his suggested world. To conclude, I will provide my own reaction about this problem supporting singer’s argument. Should wealthier nations have a moral duty to relieve poorer nations if a disastrous event were to happen? I think that we all must contribute in times of need even if this means substantially modifying the way in which we live for the objective of assisting other people so long as it doesn't cause us to suffer.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the essay “Famine, Affluence, and Morality” author, Peter Singer, exercises his theory about everyone’s moral obligation to help world hunger. Every day people make choices, whether it be what pants to wear, what food items to buy at the store, or whether or not you donate money to those suffering. Across the world there are avoidable sufferings according to Singer as long as people do their part; “if it is in our power to prevent something very bad from happening, we ought to morally do it” (889).…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the article “The Singer Solution to World Poverty” by Peter Singer advocates for Americans to donate more to charities to help world poverty. That we are not giving enough. The issue we encounter is we do not see these poor kids in other countries at a personal level. They are just a picture on a website. Thus, we are not able to put ourselves in their shoes. Without that empathy connection, we will not see the need to give. Peter Singer believes Americans have plenty to give. That we should be donating one-fifth of our salaries to the charity organization. Yet, many of us don’t. All it would take to donate is a change our lifestyle spending habits. Only buying things we need to survive, and not purchasing items we can live without. Like, the new tv Dora wanted in his…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Response to Peter Singer

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Everyday wealthy and middle class Americans across the country spend money on luxury items such as: flat screen televisions, laptop computers, digital cameras, fancy cars, and smart phones. At the same time, across the globe in poverty stricken countries, people and children are living in destitution. Many of these people lack a basic human need which commonly includes nutrition, healthcare, education, clothing, shelter, and clean water. Peter Singer, author of 'The Singer Solution to World Poverty', suggests that all Americans that are financially stable to donate should be donating all their non-essential money to the needy people across the globe. This seems like the morally right thing to do, however Singers argument overlooks many factors in his bias, and leaves to many questions unanswered to make his essay true or reasonable to any extent. Is it morally right to make a hardworking American give up all luxuries to the needy people they will never meet? Of course, Americans should feel the need to donate to the needy people of our world. Although the amount they donate should be entirely up to them.…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Based on the article by Peter Singer entitled Famine, Affluence, and Morality, he attempts to move us to do more for charities and gives one astounding example. He uses starving children in Bengali and a drowning child.…

    • 1156 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Kiwanis International Club held a survey where they asked when is it important to help out others? 75% of people believe in helping others when it will have an important impact on not only their lives but on other people's lives. When asked what type of community service makes the biggest difference, ⅔ answered hands on activities such as donating supplies, volunteering with a local service club, or participating in local community events have a bigger influence than just giving out money (Most Americans Believe One Can Can Change the World). Today, because of the sacrifices and achievements of many strong leaders, others now have their independence from countries, they have the right to vote, improved working conditions, or just an opportunity to be a better person. According to the survey on volunteerism done by the Kiwanis International Club, 86% of Americans believe one person can make a change (“Most Americans Believe One Can Change the World”). If this many people believe that humans are capable of making a change in the world, then the only thing stopping us from improving the world is us. As a quote by an anonymous person states “If you’re searching for that one person who will change your life...take a look in the mirror”; humans are the future of the world, and to live prosperous lives, we should be willing to help improve not only our living conditions, but to not be selfish and lend a helping hand to others in need as well. What the world is molded into is because of us, and as John F. Kennedy once said, “Making a positive difference in our own life or the lives of others, organizations, and the world at large starts with a healthy mind, body, and spirit, and a change of daily thoughts, communications, and actions of our own self…

    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Countless times I wished to be face to face with the child or group I was indirectly supporting through monetary donations or through volunteer work and somehow provide them with more than just a temporary solution to their lifelong dilemma. I believe that the only true solution is to educate and provide them the means of which to construct a maintainable lifestyle without the constant support of others. In a perfect world, organizations such as American Red cross, Unicef, the Salvation Army, and every other organization that relies on donations would not exist and we’d simply live a life in which we primarily depend on ourselves. Simply because something seems unattainable or beyond our grasp doesn't mean we shouldn’t at least strive for it and that is exactly what my continued volunteer work will aim to do: work towards a perfect world. This idea reminds me of a commonly used expression by Norman Vincent Peal: “Shoot for the moon. Even if you miss, you'll land among the…

    • 537 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ayn Rand

    • 572 Words
    • 2 Pages

    3. The proper method of judging when or whether one should help another person is by reference to one’s own rational self-interest and one’s own hierarchy of values: the time, money or effort one gives or the risk one takes should be proportionate to the value of the person in relation to one’s own happiness. What might the social and political outcome be if that approach were implemented? As far as a political outcome is concerned, I feel that this approach has already been implemented. Politicians only care about themselves and what they can get out of the deal, as power and greed take presence before the people…

    • 572 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Giving your money to the poor or to charity organizations may sound easy enough, but in practice it is basically impossible. Peter Singer, in his recent NY Times article, “The Singer Solution to World Poverty,” argues that the rich should donate whatever luxuries and whatever money they don’t’ need all to the less prosperous. Many would argue both for and against such a viewpoint, and such a “solution” would require evaluation of its pros and cons before application.…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays