Preview

Bernie Madoff Ripoff of the Century

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4307 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bernie Madoff Ripoff of the Century
The Fraud of the Century:
The Case of Bernard Madoff

The fraud perpetrated by Bernard Madoff which was discovered in December, 2008 is based upon a Ponzi scheme. Madoff took money from new investors to pay earnings for existing customers. The greater the payout to retiring and withdrawing customer, the more revenue or clients he would need to start and “investment relationship” with Madoff. The Ponzi scheme was named after Charles Ponzi who in the early 20th Century, saw a way to profit from international reply coupons. International reply coupons were a guarantee of return postage in response to an international letter. Charles Ponzi determined that he could make money, legally, by swapping out these coupons for more expensive postage stamps in countries where the stamps were of higher value. While making a significant profit with this system, Ponzi got the idea of enticing investors to provide him more capital to trade coupons for higher priced postage stamps. His promise to investors was a 50% profit in a few days. Touted as a financial wizard and the ‘Warren Buffet’ of his day, Ponzi lived outside Boston, he had a fairly opulent life bringing in as much as $250,000/day. Part of Ponzi’s success came from is personal charisma and ability to con even savvy investors. The promised payout was supported by the new investors anxious to take advantage of these robust returns because he appeared to create an image of power, trust, and responsibility. In July of 1920, the Boston Post ran an article exposing the scheme and soon after, regulators raided his offices and charging him with mail fraud knowing that his fabricated investment reports were mailed to his clients. The foundational operating principle of a Ponzi scheme is that you must constantly attract new investors to pay the old investors the ‘gains’ they were promised. Most Ponzi schemes self-destruct fairly quickly as the ability to keep attracting new investors dwindles. In the case of

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Bernard Madoff “Ponzi Scheme” scandal was the biggest and lasted the longest financial fraud in the history of the US. Bernard Madoff was a financial adviser, and also the former chairman of the NADAQ. He established his investment firm named “Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC” in 1960. The Madoff Fraud is a typical “Ponzi Scheme”, in order to attract investors to give money to him, he convinced people to hand over their life saving, and promised them high returns rate, and then he used these money to make payments to those earlier investors. He took the investors for a $65 billion over the course of nearly two decades. In the end, Bernard was sentenced to maximum 150 years prison life and a forfeiture of $170 billion.…

    • 324 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Bernard Madoff, an overview was provided that describes the fraud of the century. As a result of the Ponzi scheme, social attitudes toward the investment industry were lukewarm. I will describe the highlights of the case.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In addition to The Economic Entity Assumption was a principle that continued to be violated throughout Madoffs operations. Transactions have to be recorded correctly while booking, including keeping certain transactions separated if its not related to the business. You should never mix your personal transaction with your business transactions. However, Madoff was no stranger to breaking this accounting principle. He over the years he made several transactions that would be considered unethical, because funds for business was used for personal use. accounting rule. In the article "Too Good to Be True" "Madoff began regularly wiring money to the London office to pay for personal luxuries. He purchased the $7 million Leopard Yacht in the…

    • 187 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One hundred and fifty years in prison. Shame brought to his family for bankrupting so many friends. Suicide by his son. These are the costs Bernie Madoff incurred for running a decades-long Ponzi scheme that appropriated an estimated $18 billion from investors. If Madoff was just maximizing his income, then why did so many cheer when he did the "perp…

    • 61 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. What unhealthy motivations drove Madoff to defraud investors and betray his friends? The motivation is selfishness. This is based on noted greed (extravagant lifestyle and the need to continuously take more money), narcissism (feeling of entitlement and ignoring welfare of others), and Machiavellianism (manipulation of others for self-gain, creating positive impressions while he gets what he wants).…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The organizational leadership of Bernard L Madoff Investments Securities LLC was held by Bernie Madoff himself. Madoff’s charismatic leadership style included seducing friends, those in secluded groups, and even his own employees. Madoff seduced his clients by making them to believe they were investing in something special, he would often turn people away, which helped Bernie in courting people and charities with more assets to offer. Madoff started his investment advisory firm by inviting Jewish people, many of whom belonged to exclusive country clubs as well as Jewish charities to buy in. These people would then become networkers for Madoff, by allowing other investors to buy in to the Ponzi Scheme Bernie was running.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Bernie Madoff Ponzi scheme was life altering for numerous individuals who trusted in Madoff with their life savings and hard-earned wealth. Although the original scandal made headline news over eight years ago lawsuits and other remnants still remain. In 2013, one of largest organizations that people believe contributed the J.P. Morgan (JPM) agreed to settlement with a onetime payment of $billion dollars (J.P. Morgan Chase Will Have To Pay A Fine, 2013). Although many believe that JPM was the blame for not breaking the news of the Ponzi scheme sooner due to obvious red flags related the Madoff laundering money in and out of accounts held at the bank, JPM has still taking the stance that they were not to blame. Furthermore, in 2015, another…

    • 346 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Bernie Madoff fraud happened because of greed. All of the people involved wanted more and more money and eventually the system collapsed. On March 12, 2009, Bernie Madoff pled guilty to the largest Ponzi scheme in history. He successfully took $65 billion from investors that trusted him with their money.…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    3 Madoff

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Madoff was providing his clients with monthly investment statements and trade transactions that never occurred. He used new client’s funds to pay profits to existing clients. Which is typical in Ponzi schemes.…

    • 458 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    No One Would Listen

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages

    This book brought out the failures of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in one of the biggest Ponzi schemes in America’s history, as orchestrated by Bernie Madoff. Harry Markopolos caught up with Madoff’s Ponzi scheme earlier on in his career and saw all the red flags. There was no explanation of the continuous one percent yield in over forty five stocks that Madoff dealt with. Madoff took advantage of the laxity by the SEC officials in failing to follow up complains with an investigation, and the trust bestowed upon him by the high and mighty. As long as the public saw paper trail provided by Madoff that the stocks were continuously yielding dividends, there was no cause for alarm. The few people that realized that Madoff was actually pushing a Ponzi scheme alerted the appropriate authorities which in turn let Madoff off with a slap on the wrist. The SEC went to investigate Madoff in his building on the 18th and 19th floor but missed a whole 17th floor where the scam was mainly doing its operations. Over a period of nine years Markopolos alerted the SEC five times about the Ponzi scheme that Madoff was running, but they caught up with him when most of the money was already spent lavishly in gifts and exorbitant parties.…

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bernie Madoff Ethics

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This paper will discuss the matters of Bernard “Bernie” Madoff. Are his actions to be deemed unethical, immoral, or both immoral and unethical? Madoff plead guilty to conducting his $65 billion Ponzi scheme. This in turn led him to be charged with several counts of money laundering amongst other things. His world came crumbling down around him the day after the company’s Christmas party in December of 2008.…

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bernie Madoff

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Bernard (Bernie) Madoff committed this century’s largest Ponzi scheme to date. First we will define Ponzi Scheme – it is a fraudulent pyramid scheme where original investors are paid their gains out of new investors money so it would appear to old investor that the scheme (business) is producing an unusually large return (Albrecht, 2009). The Ponzi scheme that Madoff created and pulled off for years was quite intricate. In a standard pyramid scheme each victim unknowingly brings in more and more victims, where as a Ponzi scheme has a single entity (group or individual) to keep up with and organize the fraud. The operator of the Ponzi scheme then will take new money brought in from recent investors and pay off previous investors. For this to continue on there must be a constant influx of new investors so there must be someone working that angle on a regular basis. Eventually the group of new investors will run out because the funds dry up. In a lot of Ponzi schemes when they begin to run low on victims things seem to fall apart and investors loose it all. In some cases the perpetuator escapes the area with all the money he / she have scammed. When or if they are caught the perpetuator will have to face prosecution and / or repayment of all money to victims and possible jail / prison time or pay restitution to the government. In some cases there are assets seized to reimburse victims and pay restitution (Smith, 2011).…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bernie Madoff Case

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The issue of whether HSBC had an adequately incredible and essential effect in revealing Bernie Madoff is very controversial. However, after very careful consideration, I believe that HSBC’s role had a sufficiently great and important impact in uncovering Bernie Madoff.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bernard Madoff

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages

    “A Ponzi scheme is a type of securities fraud where the promoter makes some sort of false or misleading statement about an investment (often including a guaranteed high rate of return) and pays off older investors with newer investor 's monies. Eventually, when the promoter can 't find any new investors, the scheme collapses. Ponzi schemes are named for Charles Ponzi who, in the early part of last century, took investors for millions by guaranteeing big returns from arbitrage profits from purported investment called an "International Postal Reply Coupon." (American Bar Association.)…

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Investment Fraud

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Charles Ponzi will forever infamously known as the con man of the 1920’s. Ponzi dealt with numerous amounts of investors who all trusted him to make them a profit on their investments. Unfortunately, Charles Ponzi was a crook from the start. He bought a total of $30 dollars in IPRC’s and stole about $30 million of his investor’s money. His brilliant idea that landed him in jail was to not buy IRPC’s at all, but to give people part of their own investments and call it a profit; hence “Ponzi Scheme”. Since the 1920’s there have been numerous “investment managers” who have committed the same con as Ponzi. When you break it down, it really is just handing money to someone you don’t know, in hopes that you will see a profit. You can ask the same question about why people gamble with the same answer to why people use the stock market: whether it be to supplement you’re income, to earn capital gains or for the mere feeling of excitement as if one was playing poker.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics