Preview

Bad Neighbor Policy: Washington's Futile War on Drugs in Latin America"

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3245 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Bad Neighbor Policy: Washington's Futile War on Drugs in Latin America"
Book review:

"Bad Neighbor Policy: Washington's futile war on drugs in Latin America"
Edited by Ted Galen Carpenter

Overview

Introduction 3

I Modest results after thirty years of war 4

The war on drugs consequences on the drugs crops cultivation 4
The war on drugs consequences on the Latin American opinion 5

II The American strategy on the drug war: definitively a bad strategy? 8

The United States' strategy on the war on drugs 8
The causes of the American's strategy failure 9

III Is "legalisation" the solution for a decrease in the amount of drug in the united States' streets 12

Conclusion 14

Sources 17

Introduction

"Bad neighbor policy: Washington's futile war on drugs in Latin America", from Ted Galen Carpenter, draws a negative critic (as suggested by the title) of the fight against drugs in United States. Carpenter, who is Vice President for Defence and Foreign Policy studies at the Cato Institute in Washington, gives clearly his negative opinion on what is for him the drug war failure.
This "war" has for purpose to protect the American population against the drug scourge; however this war is mainly set in Latin America. In fact the United States war on drugs began with the entry of Richard Nixon as President in the White house. The year 1968 is marked by the will to eradicate the narcotic problem in United States. Because the supply comes from Latin America, President Nixon decides to cut the supply, by intervening directly in Latin America whether than on the American territory.

The problematic of the book seems to be: What are the consequences of the American war on drugs in Latin America? In fact the consequences on the United States territory are not shown, which should be, considering the conclusion, the purpose of the book.

In this book review, we will in a first part discuss about the global results of this war. Then we will consider the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Secondly, I believe there are some connections between the rises in drug distribution in African-American communities in the U.S. in the late 80’s and that of Latin American countries. After, reading chapter two and learning about of the CIA “[turned] to the drug trade for an illicit source of fund… beginning the trend toward privatizing war”. For the need to change the world and dominate have lead us to limiting and label others as our enemies because they have or seem to have the potential challenge our western norms. Therefore, it might seem ideal to use money and blood to quell our fears and as a result we are willing to partake in “the pursuit of war by proxy [which] led to alliance between the CIA and drug dealers. Even though Nicaragua…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fbn Vs Anslinger

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages

    A year after the stock market crashed, 1930, and president Hoover is in office, America is in a state of existential crisis and people are looking for answers and distractions. The Treasury Department created the Federal Bureau of Narcotics under Harry J. Anslinger who directed the agency until 1962 “and molded America’s drug policy” (The United States War on Drugs). Anslinger who was also a prohibitionist, who believed progress could only be achieved by controlling each individual’s impulses and thought that if enough people were put in jail that America would rid itself of drugs. Nonetheless, with these same beliefs, Anslinger, used these to fight the war on drugs. Armed with a Depression snug budget, and an uphill battle Anslinger tried and failed to get state governments involved with the war effort.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Chapter 2 of The New Jim Crow focuses on how the system of mass incarceration works. Alexander concentrates on the "War on Drugs," because "convictions for drug offenses are the single most important cause of the explosion in incarceration rates in the United States." Early on, she exposes myths, noting that the war is not "aimed at ridding the nation of drug 'kingpins' or big-time drug dealers," and the drug war is not "principally concerned with dangerous drugs" (60).…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Andes, Stephen. "Charting the Possibilities of Drug Restriction." INTL 4997: International Studies Seminar - The Mexican Drug Trade. Allen Hall, Baton Rouge. 5 Oct. 2012. Lecture.…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Although Richard Nixon first declared a “war on drugs” in 1971, the war escalated during the Reagan presidency and shifted its focus from treatment toward incarceration and law enforcement. As George Moss and Evan Thomas explain, Reagan came to Washington “committed to waging a war on drugs and bringing the international drug trade under control” in 1981. Thanks to the rise of the Medellin Cartel in Colombia and other cartels in Latin America during the 1980s, illegal drug trade networks flourished, and America became “the world’s major consumer of illicit drugs.” This increased usage of drugs led to many social crises, including heightened urban crime and health problems, which encouraged both the Reagan administration and private groups…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    drugs in americas paper 1

    • 1262 Words
    • 1 Page

    How is it possible that America, the strongest country in the world, cannot rid the use and sale of illegal drugs? First, we must take a look at what their policy includes. The Drug Wars’ “primary aim is to prohibit supply, so that Americans cannot find or cannot afford drugs to use; its secondary aim is to discourage those who do consume drugs, mainly by penalizing them,” (Bertram, pg. 3.) Still, with this policy and its lack of achievement, we deny any true change. “Despite a decline in casual drug use since the late 1970’s, and despite the billions of dollars spent to fight the drug war, the number of people suffering drug use or addiction, the level of violent drug-related crime, and the spread of diseases linked to drug…

    • 1262 Words
    • 1 Page
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Prohibition In The 1920's

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This online article talks about the similarities between the prohibition and the War on Drugs. It offers theories about why the war on drugs continues to be waged and states that it is primarily due to the stubbornness of the United States government. They bring up the fact that many high profile individuals and politicians have used illegal drugs yet they still support the war. They also bring up the financial burden that came along with prohibition and point out that the same burden is being placed on us nearly 80 years later yet…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The legalization of the drug can be argued on many levels both good and bad, but in the end it weighs down to the realization that this could actually be a good thing and an answer for America’s economy.…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thesis: The Mexican president Felipe Calderón’s war on drugs has seen some progress, but it has come at a heavy price to the people who live there and the neighboring countries.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    War On Drugs In The 1960s

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Ultimately the new “war on drugs” had a negative impact on American life during the mid 1980s-early 2000s due to the economic costs, the strain put on our justice system, and the civil liberty violations that occurred. As with any other war or bureaucratic endeavor, money must be heavily drawn upon and invested. When discussing the overall cost of this “war” through this time, congressman Lee Hamilton stated that, “Federal and local governments spend over $3 billion each year to fight drugs.” (cite) In his quote it becomes apparent that the United States had become highly invested and arguably obsessed in a seemingly impossible “war.”…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1970's Drug Abuse

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One of the attempts of the United States to stop influx of smuggled marijuana from Mexico was under “Operation Intercept” in 1969. The operation was made because of belief that Marijuana was being streamlined into the United States from Mexico and it was to blame. This policy of supply drug control is one that the United States adopted for many countries. The United States adopted a policy of containment rather than treatment. Another strategy used by the United States was the aerial spraying of drug crops in Mexico. Both the success in Operation Intercept and in aerial eradication were short lived as more crops and drugs would be cultivated again and replaced. The main reason for these policies that were more offensive toward other countries, rather than reflective, was because politicians during this time believed getting rid of the drugs at the cultivations source would be the least costly option rather than brainstorming on plans to improve the citizens back home who were losing themselves more to poverty and misery due to the consumption of drugs. Also most of the aid that was budgeted for the United States to use on the attempt to diminish drug trafficking abroad was not used to fund international organizations against drugs. Only 3 percent of this budget…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many have said that the war on drugs is a failure and needs reform. Others have lamented that the war on drugs is a war that cannot be won and valuable resources and money has been used up. Drugs are cheaper, purer, and more easily obtained than ever before. The war on drugs is futile. This paper will discuss why the United States should end the war on drugs.…

    • 555 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Legalization of Marijuana

    • 2091 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Gray, James P, (2001) Why our drug laws have failed and what we can do about it: A…

    • 2091 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The estimated total of funding from the government has come close to almost $1.4 trillion dollars (Editorial; Nixon's drug war still hurts the poor). For more than forty years, America has funded efforts to suppress the importation of illegal drugs and has had little to no success. Looking at the outcomes of this war, the results are hundreds of thousands innocents dead in other foreign countries. As in Mexico alone, the total rate of homicides was estimated to 11 per 100,000 individuals in 2005; by 2010, it was 18.5 per 100,000 individuals (Enamorado). The effects of the domestic war on drugs is spilling into other countries as a power struggle for who will gain control of the large US market. If marijuana was legal, this effect would no longer be relevant. Individuals would be less likely to seek out and buy the drug for recreational use through illegal…

    • 1611 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Silver or Lead

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Our government tries to fight too much from the wrong side as Javdani tells us “In an attempt to find the quickest way around a complicated problem, each year the United States sends billions in aid dollars every year to the governments of Latin American ‘drug source’ countries” (403). This statement by Javdani shows just how lopsided the war on drugs is. Our government believes if we bring the fight to the source, we can stop the drugs from coming into our country and therefore win the drug war. As Javdani tells us, this is not the best approach as most landowners in these Latin American countries do not have a choice of whether or not their land is cultivated for drugs. Drug lords control vast areas of these Latin American countries with impunity. Our aid dollars and military equipment are not enough for these governments to secure the country sides for their citizens, lack of training and support for law enforcement combined with widespread government corruption ensure that the majority of our aid dollars to these countries fail to stop the drug flow.…

    • 331 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays