As part of his thematic approach, he collates the deeds of each emperor, sorting them into separate ‘positive’ and ‘negative’ sections. This division is explicitly marked in Nero’s biography: “These deeds, some of them meriting no reproach, others even deserving some praise, I have gathered together to separate them from the shameful deeds and crimes with which I shall henceforth be concerned.”[1] Within these ‘chapters’, actions are grouped together and used as “items of evidence” for the emperor’s character traits, which are either virtues or vices.[2] For instance, Augustus’ generosity is exemplified by “the frequency, variety and magnificence of the games he provided” for the people.[3] Meanwhile, Tiberius’ refusal to provide “a salary for those who accompanied him on his travels and military expeditions” acts as an example of his rapacity.[4] Across his imperial biographies, Suetonius consistently interprets the behaviour of emperors using pairs of opposing virtues and vices: liberality and avarice, clemency and cruelty, civility and incivility, and restraint and extravagance.[5]Suetonius chooses this set of attributes, because, together, they convey the manner in which his emperors “treated their people”, making them ideal standards for judging them as rulers.[6] Based on this, Suetonius clearly distinguishes between entirely virtuous ‘good emperors’ such as Augustus and ‘bad emperors’ like Tiberius who possess most, if not all the aforementioned…