Preview

attribution theory

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
4901 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
attribution theory
Attribution (psychology)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In social psychology, attribution is the process by which individuals explain the causes of behavior and events. Attribution theory is the study of various models that attempt to explain those processes.[1] Psychological research into attribution began with the work of Fritz Heider in the early part of the 20th century, subsequently developed by others such as Harold Kelley and Bernard Weiner.

Contents

1 Background 2 Types 2.1 Explanatory attribution 2.2 Interpersonal attribution 3 Theories 3.1 Common sense psychology 3.2 Correspondent inference theory 3.3 Covariation model 3.4 Three-dimensional model 4 Bias and errors 4.1 Fundamental attribution error 4.2 Culture bias 4.3 Actor/observer difference 4.4 Dispositional attributions 4.5 Self-serving bias 4.6 Defensive attribution hypothesis 5 Application 5.1 Learned helplessness 6 Perceptual salience 7 Criticism 8 See also 9 References 10 Further reading

Background

Psychological research into attribution began with the work of Fritz Heider, often described as the "father of attribution theory",[2] during the early years of the 20th century. Fritz Heider was born in Vienna, Austria in 1896. As a teenager, he had a deep love of the arts and would often spend time painting. However, his father, an architect, encouraged him to choose a more practical career. Fritz then tried his hand at architecture and law, but nothing truly provoked his interest until he enrolled in the University of Graz in 1916, where he became drawn to philosophy and psychology. By 1919, he began writing his thesis on “the subjectivity of sense qualities” [3] and was eventually awarded a doctorate in 1920 for his findings. In his 1920 's dissertation Heider addressed a fundamental problem of phenomenology:



References: Fiske, S.T., & Taylor, S.E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Heider, F Jones, E. E. and Davis, K. E. (1965) From acts to dispositions: the attribution proces in social psychology, in L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Volume 2, pp. 219-266), New York: Academic Press Kelley, H

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Man3240 Exam 2 Study Guide

    • 4273 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Attribution theory: an attempt when individuals observe behavior to determine whether it is internally or externally caused…

    • 4273 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Attributions are the causal judgments about why the event or behavior occurred. These attributions can be either internal (made about a person’s characteristics, e.g. personality) or external (made about a person’s situation e.g. weather). One type of the attribution theory that helps us to determine the “why” in behavior is the Kelley’s Covariation Model of Attribution (Kelley, 1967). In this model, behaviour is analyzed to see how well it is correlated either internal or external factors or a combination of both. When making attributions using the Kelley’s covariation there are three criteria in which the attributions are based on: consensus, distinctiveness, and consistency. Consensus criterion is whether the behavior is correlated with the situation or in other terms whether different people do this behavior in the same situation. Distinctiveness refers to the correlation between behaviour and the individual specifically how unique the behavior is to that particular situation. Last out of the three is consistency which looks at how behavior is correlated with both the person and the situation that is, is the behavior is the same towards the…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Attribution theory describes how causes are attributed to past events. This may be dispositional (attributed to a person) or situational. In a single instance of an outcome, correspondent inference theory suggests diagnosis is based on choice, expectations and intent. Expected, freely chosen behaviour is considered to be dispositional, whereas unexpected, forced behaviour is attributed to situation. Attributing intent is simplest when considering behaviour with only one positive effect. When an outcome occurs numerous times, covariation theory describes possible cause attribution. This involves looking at cases where the suspected cause is present/absent and matching them to instances where the outcome is present/absent, utilising information on consensus (how others behave), distinctiveness (how the individual behaves in different circumstances) and consistency (how the individual has behaved in similar circumstances). Consistency should be high to make a good attribution judgement. When consensus and distinctiveness are also high, the attribution is likely to be situational whereas if consensus and distinctiveness are low, a dispositional attribution is likely.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Social psychologists interested in social perception and cognition have an ‘intuitive scientist’ model of how people understand their worlds – people seek ‘truths’ in a logical and rational way (as cited in Buchanan et al, 2007, p.106). They suggest that in order for people to have a sense of control over their social interactions, they make inferences and assumptions about people’s behaviour and events that they encounter. This concept falls under the ‘attribution theory’ umbrella, which means; assigning cause to our own or other peoples behaviour. Fritz Heider (cited in Buchanan et al, 2007) was the first to propose a psychological theory of attribution. Heider discussed what he called “naïve” or “commonsense” psychology. In his view, people were like amateur scientists, trying to understand other people’s behaviour by piecing together information until they arrived at a reasonable explanation or cause. However, there is also evidence that suggests that this is not the case and that people do not always behave in ‘rational’ or ‘objective’ ways as expected. This essay therefore aims to evaluate both sides of the argument whilst concluding whether the ‘lay scientist’ view is realistic or not.…

    • 1613 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cognitive Psych Study Guide

    • 6138 Words
    • 25 Pages

    Personal attributions- also know as internal or dispositional attributions, are explanations that refer to things within people, such as abilities, traits, moods, or efforts.…

    • 6138 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Attribution theory is concerned with how individuals interpret events and how this relates to their thinking and behaviour. Heider (1958) was the first to propose a psychological theory of attribution, but Weiner and colleagues (e.g., Jones et al, 1972; Weiner, 1974, 1986) developed a theoretical framework that has become a major research paradigm of social psychology…

    • 279 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Psychology Study

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Describe the biases commonly seen in attribution, including the fundamental attribution error, the actor-observer effect. List the factors that may account for these biases.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    psych

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages

    14. Fundamental attribution error: a bias toward overattributing the behavior of others to internal causes…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Cognitive Dissonance Paper

    • 1169 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The attribution theory attempts to explain how we attach meaning to either our behavior or other people’s behavior. As explained by Malle (2011), the attribution theory examines how the social observer uses certain tiding to arrive at contributory clarifications for certain events. Attribution theory, therefore, is keen on examining how information is gathered and shared to shape a causal ruling. The first proponent of this theory, Heider believed that individuals are naïve psychologists who try to make sense out of the world around them. This theory was later taken up by various…

    • 1169 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ass. This Is a Paper

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Attribution theory, an example of the social cognition perspective, advances the view that how one is likely to interact with others in situations involving conflicts is a function of what the person perceives to be the cause of others' behavior…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    You are the commissioner of a state lottery system that sponsors daily and weekly drawings. Lottery tickets have not been selling well over the past few months. Describe at least two ways you could take advantage of people's use of the availability heuristic to boost sales. Explain why you would judge your tactics to be fair or unfair to your customers.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Human beings can explain anything. No matter the cause, we have a strong need to understand and explain everything. Due to people feeling the need to explain, it goes beyond the information received. Attribution theory is a theory about how people explain things.3333333333333. Explanation is a synonym for attribution. There are two types of explanations about why things happen. They are external attribution and internal attribution. External attribution places blame to an outside agent or force.333333333. An example is "My girlfriend made me do it." An internal attribution puts all blames on him or herself.33333333333. An example of this is "It is my entire fault we lost the game, all I had to do was make that…

    • 561 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of social psychology theories that describe human behaviors is attribution theory. Attribution theory is the theory of how individuals explain others’ behaviors (Myers, 2008). Deindividuation is the situation where anti-normative behavior is released in groups in which individuals are not recognized as individuals (Festinger, 1952). Many people are a part of this deindividuation process and don’t even realize it. Many people fall into deindividuation because they don’t want to ridiculed or be consider an outcast. Something that is an example of deindividuation is a cult. In a cult people are no longer an individual and there is no uniqueness to them. They become just like everyone else in the group. Another example of this is a fraternity or sorority. They go from being an individual person to becoming a part of a group where they are considered one big group versus being their own person. Being in the military is also an example of deindividuation. They are to fight and defend themselves against anyone who is considered a threat. They also have a uniformed look. Everyone has to go through training and every guy has to shave his hair.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1972 a group of acknowledged sophist published a book in which he explained the treatments of attribution processes. The 1980s is the decade in which major portion of social psychology is studied which includes social thinking, social identity, and the most prominent elaboration likelihood model. Most of the study of attribution was done in late 1960s and 1970s.…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Individuals whom possess an unambiguous perception are extremely likely to foster this bias of fundamental attribution error. For instance, one’s early assumptions of a quiet person he or she met at a family festivity may emulate an unfavorable first impression. In fact, others in attendance may ostracize the individual based on his or her behavior. However, in this case, the person was informed of a family tragedy prior to arriving at the event. Naturally, an event of such magnitude would alter a person's behavior in a social setting. After examining the situation, one may conclude a different perspective of the individual’s behavior; hence a non-descriptive trait. In addition to obedience in authority and fundamental attribution error, a self-serving bias is also a factor, which shapes an individual’s personal…

    • 583 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics