Preview

Attribution Theory 2

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1312 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Attribution Theory 2
Attribution theory explains how and why we perceive other people the way we do. It can be applied to many different areas such as marketing, psychology and organizational behavior. It allows us to understand how we judge characters and behaviors based on information given to or surrounding us. This constantly happens in our everyday lives. For instance, when walking down a street, we are most likely to make some comment to ourselves if an interesting looking person walked past. There are two ways to explain attribution theory- internal and external, which can either be controllable or uncontrollable. Internal attribution is when we explain one 's behavior based on factors within the person, such as intelligence. External attribution is when we explain behavior based on situations such as the weather. There are three factors to consider when deciding if the attribution is internal or external (Robbins, Millet & Waters-Marsh 2007, p.45). The first factor- distinctiveness, focuses on different situations and whether different behaviors are observed (Robbins et al. 2007, p.46). The second factor- consensus, which exists if everyone responds to a similar situation in the same way (Robbins et al. 2007, p.46). The last factor is consistency- whether there is a pattern observed in one 's actions (Robbins et al. 2007, p.46). Under any circumstances, a person is always open to various interpretations of others, possibly creating distorted perspectives.

The given mini-case is an example of deciding whether to attribute a person 's behavior to internal or external causes. It is a job interview and involves two interviewers, or otherwise, observers- Rowan and Sarah. In such a situation, various factors can come into play and influence the observers ' judgements of the interviewees. The decision greatly depends on the observers- how affected they will be by first impressions and whether they are able to consider all possible factors. It is easy for them to make irrational



Bibliography: Carol, Robert T. (2009). Anchoring Effect. Retrieved August 10, 2010, from, http://www.skepdic.com/anchoring.html McGinnis, Sheila. K. (2007). Organizational Behavior and Management Thinking. In Buchbinder, Sharon B. & Shanks, Nancy H. (Eds), Introduction to Health Care Management. (pp. 37-58), 1st ed., Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC. Robbins, S. Millet, B. Waters-Marsh, T. (2007). Organizational Behavior, 5th ed, Pearson Education Australia, Frenchs Forest. Simmering, Marcia J., (2010). Attribution Theory. Retrieved August 10, 2010, from, http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/management/A-Bud/Attribution-Theory.html

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Man3240 Exam 2 Study Guide

    • 4273 Words
    • 18 Pages

    Attribution theory: an attempt when individuals observe behavior to determine whether it is internally or externally caused…

    • 4273 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Attributions are the causal judgments about why the event or behavior occurred. These attributions can be either internal (made about a person’s characteristics, e.g. personality) or external (made about a person’s situation e.g. weather). One type of the attribution theory that helps us to determine the “why” in behavior is the Kelley’s Covariation Model of Attribution (Kelley, 1967). In this model, behaviour is analyzed to see how well it is correlated either internal or external factors or a combination of both. When making attributions using the Kelley’s covariation there are three criteria in which the attributions are based on: consensus, distinctiveness, and consistency. Consensus criterion is whether the behavior is correlated with the situation or in other terms whether different people do this behavior in the same situation. Distinctiveness refers to the correlation between behaviour and the individual specifically how unique the behavior is to that particular situation. Last out of the three is consistency which looks at how behavior is correlated with both the person and the situation that is, is the behavior is the same towards the…

    • 1060 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Attribution theory describes how causes are attributed to past events. This may be dispositional (attributed to a person) or situational. In a single instance of an outcome, correspondent inference theory suggests diagnosis is based on choice, expectations and intent. Expected, freely chosen behaviour is considered to be dispositional, whereas unexpected, forced behaviour is attributed to situation. Attributing intent is simplest when considering behaviour with only one positive effect. When an outcome occurs numerous times, covariation theory describes possible cause attribution. This involves looking at cases where the suspected cause is present/absent and matching them to instances where the outcome is present/absent, utilising information on consensus (how others behave), distinctiveness (how the individual behaves in different circumstances) and consistency (how the individual has behaved in similar circumstances). Consistency should be high to make a good attribution judgement. When consensus and distinctiveness are also high, the attribution is likely to be situational whereas if consensus and distinctiveness are low, a dispositional attribution is likely.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Asda Marketing Strategy

    • 5404 Words
    • 22 Pages

    Hczynski, A & Buchanan, D (2007) Organizational Behavior. 6th ed. Essex, England: Pearson Education Limited.…

    • 5404 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cognitive Psych Study Guide

    • 6138 Words
    • 25 Pages

    Describe the difference between personal and situational attributions in explaining behavior. What is the Fundamental Attribution Error, and how is it related to these types of attributions?…

    • 6138 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Rationality and reasonability are inseparable from decisions (Sibley; 1953). Every decision an individual makes is made, perhaps unconsciously, in the belief that it is rational and reasonable in their current environment as we would not make them otherwise. Their rationality and reasonability comes under scrutiny from third parties, after the decision has been made with the benefit of hindsight (Sibley; 1953). The opinions I express on every case study that follows is of course one with hindsight, it is impossible for me to put myself in exactly the same situation as the individual who made the decision due to different life experiences in the short (on the day) and long (that month or the rest of his/her life) term. We believe there is a rational explanation for any decision’s success of or failure (Mankiw & Taylor; 2006). As we analyse the outcome of a decision, we are uncomfortable unless we can find solid evidence to explain what happened. We have difficulty in accepting the chaos of life as an answer (Hoffer; 1985).…

    • 3201 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Psychology Study

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Describe the biases commonly seen in attribution, including the fundamental attribution error, the actor-observer effect. List the factors that may account for these biases.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Each day people encounter peers, family, and colleagues. Throughout different social circles and situations people evaluate situations and each other using their judgment. Although, we have high levels of information processing it is believed that most times judgments are inaccurate. The fundamental attribution error defined by Ross states that people have the tendency to overestimate dispositional causes and underestimate situation causes in affecting others behavior (1977). The overemphasis on the individual, and disregard for the situation is rampant in our society because of how individualistic America’s institutions are. America is seen as the land of opportunity, and any person is free to pursue whatever dream they may have. Meanwhile, the situational environments are disregarded aren’t given much thought because it is seen that people are who they are regardless of situational stimuli. The independence seen to motivate actions is biased at times because situational factors weigh heavier then the nature of a person.…

    • 2923 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Psychology Final

    • 1909 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Chapter 11 Social Psychology: studies how your thoughts, feelings, and behavior are influenced by the presence of other people and by the social and physical environment. Social Cognition: studies how we form impressions of others, how we interpret the meaning of other people’s behavior, and how our behavior is affected by our attitudes. Person Perception: an active and subjective process that occurs in a interpersonal context; is influenced by subjective perceptions, social norms, personal goals, and self-perception. Person perception often involves using mental shortcuts−social categorization, implicit personality theories. Attribution: Explaining the behavior of others reflects common cognitive biases and explanatory patterns; fundamental attribution error, blaming the victim, hindsight bias, self-serving bias, and self-effacing bias. Attitudes: A learned tendency to evaluate an object, person, or issue in a particular way; can have cognitive, emotional, and behavioral components; although attitudes typically influence behavior, sometimes our behavior influences our attitude. When a person’s behavior conflicts with his or her attitude, cognitive dissonance may be the result. Prejudice: A negative attitude toward people who belong to a specific social group. Stereotypes: form of social categorization in which a cluster of characteristics is attributed to all members of social group or category; stereotypes are fostered by in-group and out-group thinking, and the out-group homogeneity effect; in-group bias occurs when we attribute positive qualities to members of our own group. Muzafer Sherif: Robbers cave experiment demonstrated that intergroup conflict can be decreased when groups engage in a cooperative effort. Social influence: social psychology research area that investigates how our behavior is affected by situational factors and other people. Conformity: when you adjust your opinions, judgments, or behavior so that it matches other people, or the norms of a…

    • 1909 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While figuring out what causes people to behave in the way that they do, we cannot forget the biases that may come along with it. We tend to make snap judgements of people, as the book says we have a “gut feeling.” However, going by these “gut feelings” we tend to choose one attribution over the other and they usually are not very nice attributions. For example, in class when asked to list reasons a person may be rude to you on the road, most of the reasons we came up with were that the person was an asshole or they were annoyed or what not. We tend to blame the person and not the situation. This is part of the Fundamental attribution error. While when talking about other people we often call them annoying or impatient. However, when…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    psych

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages

    15. Actor-observer bias: the tendency to attribute other people's behavior to internal causes while attributing our own behavior to external causes…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Today, researchers are more focused on “how people develop their own ideas about other people, that is attribution theory, and the ways these ideas are organized, that is called personal construct theory (Hartley113). The attribution theory, is set to explain how we perceive each other. Once we are able to master the attribution theory, we are able to understand why we perceive each other the way we do; this allows us to analyze what we will say and how we will say something in the future ahead of us, such as in perception checking. Attribution theory determines “how people decide the cause of other people’s actions and vice versa” (Hartley 116). When faced with hard times, it is important that we come to understand that “our perception of other people is inextricably bound up with our perception of the situation that we believe they are in” (Hartley…

    • 2013 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    LDR 531 Motivation

    • 1516 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Motivation is the processes that account for an individual’s intensity, direction, and persistence of effort toward attaining a goal” (Robbins and Judge, 2013, p 202). An effective leader motivates his or her followers or subordinates to perform. Leaders encourage other to be moved by something. The degree of motivation and the type of motivation are both important. The degree of motivation is how much is someone motivated and the type of motivation concerns with what brings that motivation. Both extrinsic and intrinsic motivation are mentioned as catalysts of the explained behavior. Several theories of motivation try to explain the concept and its origins. The purpose of this paper is to explain key ideas of some of the theories as they relate to a team of six members and a mentor who is in a leadership position. The DISC assessment tool will be used to compare and contrast the individuals of the team based on their personalities.…

    • 1516 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Self-Fulfilling Prophecy

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The fundamental attribution error plays a role in this because, the error is made by people in which they attribute someone else 's behavior more to their personality and characteristic then to the situation in which they have been placed. In reality, someone 's behavior is actually more likely to be caused by the environment and situation that they have been placed in as opposed to their…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    personal or work related. In every event there is always cause and effect. Many times in misattributions, the cause of a person's behavior is underestimated.…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays