Atomic Bomb Persuasive Essay

The use of the atomic bomb remains controversial to this day. There are academics and policy makers of the time that still disagree on the whether it was justifiable to destroy Hiroshima and Nagasaki. They debate if it truly was in the interest of ending the war sooner and with less loss of life. Several issues played together to help form the opinion that Truman acted for more nefarious purposes. Domestic as well as international politics is said to have played a role in the decision of Truman to go ahead with the use of the atomic bomb . Would the Japanese have been willing to surrender without the dropping of the bomb? Some experts believe that because Japanese representatives were talking to the Russians about being
Revisionist put forward a different interpretation of events. Mainly focused on the opinion that dropping the bomb was a mistake, made not for ending the war more humanely but to promote policy stances and the political atmosphere that had developed. Revisionist arguments point to the deteriorating relationship between the U.S. And Soviet Russia as evidence of this. While at the Potsdam Conference in 1945, according to Lord Avon (The World At War. Jeremy Isaacs. A&E. 1973.), Truman told Stalin about the creation of the atomic bomb before the U.S. dropped it on
In the revisionist line of thought, Truman believed that the atomic bomb would help to improve American bargaining power. By showing the Russians a demonstration of power this would help to make them more submissive in their negotiations. This in turn would be able to allow the U.S. to dictate on better footing the way in which the future of Europe would proceed. Staying with the idea of the influence of politics on the use of the bomb there is also the point of the attitude of the average American in this