Athletes or Employees
Student athletes receive scholarships for their skill set and ability to play at the collegiate level, while employees receive stability, income and benefits for their skill set and ability to contribute to the work place. Athletes as well as persons in the work force deal with adversity that directly affects there lives, yet only members of the workforce are rewarded with a source of income. It could even be said, athletes are under more pressure to perform due to not only their scholarship being on the line, but their higher education as well. Many of the athletes on large scholarships would not be able to continue their education at their respective schools if they were to be taken away. Because of the similarities between student athletes and peoples in the workforce there have been many discussions pertaining to college athletes being paid stipends, on top of the scholarships. These stipends would include 2,000 to 3,000 dollars per year and health benefits for the athletes. Student athletes should be paid stipends because they bring in millions of dollars of revenue and should be rewarded for it, athletes will then be able to afford the necessary entities to live a healthy life, these athletes are not able to have jobs, and they are already treated as employees.
College athletics are the most popular events and programs that universities have to offer. According to ensbn.com, the average revenue from Division I-A college athletic program is close to 76 million dollars per year. This, along with television contracts and the athletic alumni who donate to new programs and facilities, creates over a billion dollars of revenue. Sport enthusiasts say that the universities are taking advantage of these student athletes by not paying them an acceptable amount for their contributions. Some may say that student athletes receive more than enough gifts and benefits for their skill set and contribution to their university. However according to the NCPA(National Center for Policy Analysis), “At the University of Texas, 100% of the football players received scholarships that left them living below the federal poverty line and with an average scholarship shortfall of $2841 in 2010-11, their coaches were paid an average of over $3.5 million each in 2010 excluding bonuses”. There is something wrong with this system when the athletes doing their job as a student athlete which is bringing in millions of dollars, yet they are still in debt to the university. Those who are opposed to this change in college athletics believe that since athletes are getting scholarships that provide tuition, housing and other entities, they should not be given any more money. However, what is not widely known is that scholarships do not usually pay for everything the average student needs to have throughout their college experience. The term “full-rides” for athletes is not as common for the average student athlete, as many believe. “This change would go beyond the traditional room, board and books but to include costs such as, phone bills, transportation and even personal items like soap and tooth paste” (Chambers). Meaning that it’s not like these students are asking for professional salaries, the athletes are asking for money to support their health and well-being. Scholarships are rewarded to athletes that have the skill sets that are needed to have a successful athletic program. Also, what some people might forget the walk-ons on the team which are athletes that try-out and make the team, but are not given any scholarships. Walk-ons put in the same amount of work and dedication but are not paid back. Student athletes have been allowed to work jobs paying up to 2,000 dollars per school year since 2000, according to The Sport Digest. Thus being a reason why, some might say that if athletes want more money than they should work for it. However, the opposing views do not understand the difficulty of time management athletes...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document