Preview

Assignment on Constitution

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3282 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Assignment on Constitution
Introduction

“A constitution is a thing antecedent to a government and a government is only the creature of a constitution.A government without a constitution, is power without a right”. A written constitution is a set of fundamental principles or established precedents according to which a state or other organization is governed. An important theme in the literature is that the UK lacks a codified. A distinction is drawn between a constitution as the rules determining political conduct, which the UK like any other country has, and a codified constitution, that is a single document or collection of documents within which they are contained, which the UK lacks. We kept guessing that can a Witten constitution ensure the smooth working of a system of government? This is sometimes expressed by stating that it has an uncodified or "unwritten" constitution. However, absence of a Witten constitution means that British constitution depends less on legal rules and safeguard upon political and democratic principles. Thus, the resulting vacuum is occupied by the doctrine of Separation of Parliament, the doctrine of Separation of Powers and the concept of Rule of Law.
Parliamentary Sovereignty
Parliamentary sovereignty (also called parliamentary supremacy or legislative supremacy) is a concept in the constitutional law of some parliamentary democracies. It holds that the legislative body has absolute sovereignty, and is supreme over all other government institutions, it also include executive or judicial bodies. The concept also holds that the legislative body may change or repeal any previous legislation, and so that it is not bound by written law (in some cases, even a constitution) or by precedent
When Dicey wrote Law of the Constitution in 1885, a central part of his work was the sovereignty or supremacy of Parliament. By this he meant that Parliament had and should have the right to make or unmake any law whatever and further that no person or body is recognized by the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the Wiemar constitution it allows for the president to make decisions when there is an emergency in the country. When the stock market crashed in 1929 the United States, who was a big backer of money in Germany, pulled their money out of the German economy it sent the country into panic and some confusion. The Reichstag fell into gridlock and the president of Germany took control by exercising the emergency power clause in the Wiemar Constitution. President Hindenburg appointed temporary chancellors which both failed to control what was going on in their country which led Germans to look alternatively for answers and some started voting for the Nazi splinter group. While numbers of Nazi in the government began to rise people started noticing one of their members Adolph Hitler as a man…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!”- Patrick Henry, this saying is famous for Patrick Henry giving a speech to the people about wanting liberty from Britain. The U.S. received liberty from Britain, when they wrote the Declaration of Independence, which later inspired to write the constitution. Both gave us further liberty than before. The U.S. constitution gave the people of the United States liberty by giving rights to all people. The right of liberty for the citizens of the United States of America was provided by the constitution.…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Constitution Dbq Essay

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The birth of a nation was sparked solely from the tyrany Great Britain showed towards the colonies in the years leading up to our nation declaring it's independence. Ten years later our Founding Fathers saw us heading in the same direction. A sense of that same tyrany could eventually be found in the formerly written Articles of Confederation; which was specifically created to erase the tyrany our nation's citizens had loathed for so long. To say that the Founding Fathers scrapped the Articles of Confederation solely for personal gain is leaving out so many variables. If I were a delegate to the Convention, and upon arriving I heard the reasoning for writing a new Constitution, yes I would've stayed. To truly answer this, one must objectively…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Parliament is the supreme law-making body in the UK. This means that there are no constitutional restrains on legislative powers. This also includes the fact that courts are under an obligation to give effect to legislation passed by Parliament and not question statutes. Most importantly, Parliamentary Sovereignty is not a constitutional relic. This is simply because UK courts cannot strike down Act of Parliament. First assertion of Dicey is that Parliament’s legislative competence is unlimited. This was shown in Mortensen v Peters (1906). In this case, it was held that parliament is supreme over international law and UK courts felt bound to apply the UK Act, even though it was in contravention of international law. Another case that illustrates…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Firstly, Parliamentary sovereignty is not a constitutional relic. It may seem to be the, as part of the UK constitution continues to rely on extremely early Acts such as The Magna Carta or the Bill of Rights Act , however, these statutes continue to remain as they set out important constitutional principles. Even since 1215, it has been recognised that it is important to limit the power of the monarch, and transfer powers to parliament, in interest of balance, and the separation of powers. Up until present day, supporting Dicey’s summary above, UK courts cannot strike down an Act of Parliament, this is unlike many Supreme Courts in other countries, for example the USA, who are bound to reject legislation which contradicts the written constitutional rights. For example in the case of Mortensen v. Peters , it notes that in the event of a contradiction between international…

    • 793 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Constitution of the United States of America is perhaps the greatest document of all time. It affects everyone in the United States, and because of it, the United States is different than other countries. It was written in 1787, and now is over two hundred years old, probably older than any people living in the United States now. However, it is still relevant to everyone in the United States today. Constitution helped solved many issues at the early ages of the country, and there are still many issues faced by the American society nowadays, one of them is equality. I will talk about this issue and how constitution address it in the paper.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Constitution of the United States of America is the supreme law of the United States. The Constitution is the framework for the organization of the United States government and for the relationship of the federal government with the states, citizens, and all people within the United States.…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    • Parliament has the potential to make and unmake any law as its powers are unrestrained.…

    • 316 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    ‘The absence of a written constitution … enables constitutional change to be brought about within the United Kingdom with the minimum of constitutional formality’ (Hilaire Barnett, Constitutional and Administrative Law 2011)…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    However some argue that Britain’s uncodified constitution lacks clarity as it doesn’t exist in one clear document. Instead it consists of some written documents such as statues, court judgements and treaties but also conventions. Therefore by having a codified constitution, it would raise public awareness and the British public would understand their rights better. Furthermore it has been suggested that it could improve the problem of political ignorance and apathy in Britain because the turnout for the past three General…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Sovereignty is defined as the supreme power or authority. Therefore, ‘parliamentary sovereignty’ means there is supremacy or authority of parliament in making or unmaking the law as they like. According to A.V. Dicey, the parliament sovereignty is the single most important principle of the UK constitution. With the Parliament’s supremacy, 'no person or body is recognised by the law of England as having the right to override or set aside the legislation of Parliament ' (Roberts 2006: 87). The Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011, for example, can be used to explain parliamentary sovereignty in theory, while other examples such as Margaret Thatcher’s poll tax, the rebels of Conservative backbenchers, devolution of power, as well as UK’s entry to the European Union and the Human Rights Act of 1998 can be used to explain parliamentary sovereignty in practice. This essay will further discuss and explain the distinction between parliamentary sovereignty in theory and in practice.…

    • 1851 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Parliamentary Sovereignty

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Stemming as one of the fundamental tenets of the UK constitution, parliamentary sovereignty is often traditionally defined to that of what Dicey states, ‘the right to make or unmake any law whatever; and further, that no person or body is recognised by the law one England as having a right to override or set aside the legislation of Parliament’. This undoubtedly places parliament as the supreme law-making authority in the UK, responsible for legislating statutory law (Ingman, 2011).…

    • 1184 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    [ 10 ]. Bogdanor, V., ‘The New British Constitution’, ‘Chapter One: A Peculiar Constitution’ (2009 Hart Publishing, Oxford)…

    • 2616 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The origin of Parliamentary sovereignty began with the reduction in the King’s prerogative powers which brought about a correlative rise in the sovereignty of Parliament. From 1688, the supremacy of Parliament over the Crown was established and from this time the prerogative powers of the Crown continued, abolished or curtailed as Parliament determined. Diplock LJ stated in BBC v Johns (1965) that no new prerogative powers may be claimed by the Crown. The traditional doctrine of Parliamentary sovereignty as put forward by A.V Dicey includes firstly, the notion that the legislative ability of the UK Parliament is unlimited, in the sense that its powers to make laws on any subject matter are not open to any challenge. An example is Parliament’s ability to legislate on altering its term of office. Under the Parliament Act of 1694, the life of Parliament was limited to three years, fearing the effects of an election; Parliament passed the Septennial Act, extending the life of Parliament to seven years. The Septennial Act under a written constitution such as the United States would be legally invalid. However, Dicey argued ‘Parliament made a legal though unprecedented use…

    • 1756 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The doctrine of parliament sovereignty establishes the supreme law making body of England which is the legislature. The statutes created by the parliament are non justiciable which shows the capacity of parliament as a retrospective law making body. Though this is the fact, it was different before the 'Glorious Revolution' of 1688. The unlimited parliament legislative authority was not always being accepted in courts. In the case of Dr Bonham's it is stated that the common law had the power to control Acts of parliament and sometime declare them to be void and similarly in Day v Savadge the view was expressed that if an Act was against natural equity in that it made a man a judge in his…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays