Preview

Aristotle Happiness

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
89 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Aristotle Happiness
Although Aristotle speaks very wisely about pursuing happiness with mean virtues, that is not the case in today’s society. In fact, people tend to search and want what they don’t have in other people, such as celebrities. However, if people focused mainly on what they had, they would notice that their pursuit of happiness has always been standing right in front of the mirror, and that all they have to do is start by changing the way they view the world and themselves, as well as bettering their virtues.
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Book X: Aristotle's Claim of Contemplation as Complete Happiness
    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Book X: Aristotle's Claim of Contemplation as Complete Happiness

    In Aristotle 's Nicomachean Ethics, he is not trying to prove a Supreme Principle or a Rule to follow as a Utilitarian or a person of Deontology would suggest but rather, Aristotle is concerned with virtue ethics; a cultivation of character to be morally good. He does reach the conclusion that happiness is the final end that human beings are trying to achieve, and the activity of contemplation is the most complete happiness. Secondly, to further give reasoning as to why contemplation is superior over deliberation, a discussion of the relationship between philosophical wisdom and practical wisdom will be mentioned. In conclusion, Aristotle 's argument claims that moral life is a secondary happiness to contemplation. He gives evidential reasoning which will be discussed to show that he does not undermine his Virtue Ethics by making this claim.…

    • 1526 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Aristotle's Ethics: Luck, Virtue And Happiness
    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Aristotle's Ethics: Luck, Virtue And Happiness

    The idea that non-virtuous people is possible to be better off than virtuous people like Priam seems to acknowledge that happiness is ultimately determined by luck. Indeed, by emphasizing that certain amount of fortune is necessary to happiness, Aristotle focuses on the relationship between luck, virtue, blessedness and happiness in Chapter 8 of Book 1. In the end, he takes a more intermediate stand toward fortune, claiming that virtue is the determinant of happiness and luck is relevant and complex in a happy life. Virtuous activity itself would be enough to lead one toward happiness. Meanwhile, moderate luck and bad luck have no significant influence on the happiness of virtuous person. On the other hand, extreme luck will make virtuous person blessed while extreme bad luck will make him unhappy. Finally, a vicious person will never be happy. With extreme luck he is still unhappy and without it, he will be miserable. The extreme misfortune, falling upon virtuous person like Priam, is defined by its very nature instead of quantity. For Priam, as suggested by Aristotle, even if he survives the war he will still be virtuous yet unhappy. In other words, luck is something that has its own value, which increase or decrease (might to negative amount) quantity of happiness, and has no impact on the quality of happiness and virtue.…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Categorical Imperative Analysis
    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Categorical Imperative Analysis

    According to Aristotle every activity aims at some good, which is happiness, and that we should do so by aiming for excellence through rational activities. Happiness is being able to do well in life and live well; however, he argues that many believe happiness has to do with your wealth, pleasure, or honor. People who are wealthy are not aiming for the good they are simply seeking it for another purpose. For example, when you have a lot of money and you want the new iPhone. Well now that you purchased the phone you have to purchase a new case and a new charger and then the next best iPhone becomes available for purchase and repeat. There is no end to the cycle of wealth because people are always seeking other means, which happiness is the…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Happiness Aristotle’s and the Stoics’ View
    • 1754 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Happiness Aristotle’s and the Stoics’ View

    Happiness is all around the world, it is a very genuine and important thing, and everyone wants to be happy. Being happy is what makes life worth living, and it makes life a lot better in every way possible. What makes people happy though? Are bodily and external goods necessary to happiness? I would say no because by which they can make you happy, they are not necessary for human happiness. It’s not what things you buy, the pain, the suffering, or enjoyment your body might get. Human happiness comes from somewhere else within the human. Comparing and contrasting Aristotle’s and the Stoics’ view of human happiness will help give a better clear and logical understanding on what really happiness is and why I believe that bodily and external goods are not necessary for happiness.…

    • 1754 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Aristotle and John Stuart Mill on Happiness and Morality
    • 1773 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Aristotle and John Stuart Mill on Happiness and Morality

    In this paper I will argue that Aristotle’s conception of eudaimonia disproves Mill’s utilitarian view that pleasure is the “greatest good.” The purpose of this paper is to contrast Aristotle’s and Mills views on the value of happiness and its link to morality. First I will describe Aristotle’s model of eudaimonia. Then I will present Mill’s utilitarian views on happiness and morality. Lastly, I will provide a counterargument to Mill’s utilitarian ethical principles using the Aristotelian model of eudaimonia.…

    • 1773 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Aristotle vs Plato's View on Happiness
    • 1782 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Aristotle vs Plato's View on Happiness

    Many people try to define and consider different definitions of what happiness is, and I think that Plato and Aristotle offer interesting views of happiness and what it means for one to live a good life. Both philosophers agree that happiness is an important factor in one’s life and essentially the essence of how to live a good life. Plato offers many theories and definitions of justice leading to happiness, while Aristotle argues that happiness is the main goal that all humans aim for in their entire life. Plato offers a philosophical view of a happy life for an individual by explaining a just state and what it would entail and also the theory of the forms that one must understand to achieve happiness. After learning about both philosophers, I have come to the conclusion that I agree with Aristotle’s view of happiness more because he gives us a broad outline of what a good life is. Although Plato was Aristotle’s mentor, Aristotle offers a view of happiness that is more plausible and relevant than Plato’s because it places a large emphasis on the idea of the function of a human being. Therefore, in this paper, I will argue that I agree with Aristotle’s view of happiness over Plato’s because of the way Aristotle describes how humans can achieve the greatest good in life: happiness.…

    • 1782 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Happiness In Plato's The Republic
    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Happiness In Plato's The Republic

    As the discussion on defining happiness thickens in the Republic, Socrates starts comparing the makings of a good city to a good soul as a way to successfully segue into explaining what the true meaning of happiness is. He explains that a well-functioning city is equivalent to happiness. If a city is stable and flourishing, then the city as a whole would be happy and the citizens would also be happy, especially if they are free from any internal or external conflicts. Though some can argue that there is no correlation between the well-being of a city and its citizens, one cannot simply ignore that a poorly functioning city directly influences the state of living of its citizens negatively; how can the citizens be happy if their city isn’t functioning…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle and the Pursuit of Happiness
    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Aristotle and the Pursuit of Happiness

    Eudaimonia stands for happiness in Greek. Aristotle argues that the highest good for human beings is happiness. He insists that every action performed by humans is to pursue happiness. Aristotle also argues that human action is always aimed at some end or good. This "good" may not be viewed as a good action or any good by others, but for the doer of the action ("good"), the activity will be perceived as good and that it will bring a favorable outcome. Aristotle also said that all of our actions resulting in ends or goods form a hierarchy. This hierarchy, incorporates a ladder of things, and this ladder would categorize things according to their importance. And the most important thing would be on top of the ladder, thus being the ultimate end. This ultimate end is what all the actions aim to reach at or achieve. [This end must be self-sufficient, it must be attainable and it must be what we want]1. Therefore, because happiness includes all these, then it must be the highest good. An example of this ladder could be a person working hard to lose weight or trying to stay in shape. The bottom step of the ladder is the person working out in a gym, but why is the person working out? To lose weight or maintain their shape. Why does the person want to lose weight or maintain their shape? To look good physically and to be healthy. Why does the person want to look good or be healthy? To be attractive and to lead a stress-less and a comfortable life. And why does the person want to be attractive and/or lead a healthy life? To have peace of mind and to be happy. This example shows that every action is aimed at some end and the ultimate end to the action is happiness. Therefore based on the circumstances, the highest good is happiness and happiness alone.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle And Utilitarianism: The Greatest Happiness Principle
    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Aristotle And Utilitarianism: The Greatest Happiness Principle

    Aristotle and Utilitarians seem to voice different opinions when it comes to pleasure. Aristotle discusses pleasures to be a negative and is something not to indulge on frequently or often. He further explains how valuable it is that humans use the power of reason and critical thought to guide themselves throughout life towards happiness. Utilitarianism or The Greatest Happiness Principle speaks upon pleasure being the absence of pain. “It is better to be a human dissatisfied than a pig satisfied…” was the simplest line throughout the whole text as it infers, in comparison to a pig, a morally good human who is unhappy is deemed better off than an immoral human satisfied by their own wrong doings. Utilitarianism understands that it is too much to ask of one to act in the greater good of society, but when making decisions they need to be either for the pleasure it provides or as a means of pleasure. All this…

    • 444 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Socrates, Plato, and Aristotels View on Happiness
    • 1539 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Socrates, Plato, and Aristotels View on Happiness

    What is happiness, and how can one achieve true happiness? This is the ultimate question of life and what every person is seeking an answer to. Many feel that they have found their answer in belonging to the faith of their choice, but what is it that their faith teaches them that brings them happiness? The Philosophers Socrates, Plato and Aristotle all have a similar view on what happiness is and how to achieve it. Aristotle's view is based on Plato's and Plato's is based on Socrates' teachings; this is why they are similar but they are all important and different with each philosopher's personal views and beliefs.…

    • 1539 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Explain Aristotle's View Of Happiness
    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Explain Aristotle's View Of Happiness

    Aristotle's view of happiness is actually what we normally call fulfillment. Happiness for Americans is hanging out with friends, going to movies experiencing life, and spending time with our family. Aristotle's happiness is living a full life and not having any regrets when it is time to die. Despite calling it different terms I feel it is still the ultimate goal in life. I work hard in school because I want to have a great career I love. If I just wanted short term happiness than I wouldn't be trying hard and not continue education. I believe that if I am about to die I will have lived a more fulfilled (happy) life if I work hard for my career. If I just hang around and party I will be happy but in the long run I will regret it.…

    • 255 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Greek Idea Of Happiness
    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Greek Idea Of Happiness

    The Greeks had many ideas that contributed to the big concept of happiness. One of the many ideas that I learn from Greek philosophies is the idea of Agnostic, From a Greek meaning “unknown” or “unknowable”. This is commonly used to describe a person who does not patiently disbelieve in god but who asserts that nothing about god, including his existence, can be known for a certain. Another concept that compromises the idea of happiness is morality, in other words, depending on your beliefs distinguishing right from wrong. I will be comparing and contrasting how some of the ideas that I learned in my humanities class intertwine each other with the idea of happiness.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Aristotle Good Life Analysis
    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Aristotle Good Life Analysis

    Question 7: Aristotle says we cannot really be happy without certain external goods that are not fully in our control: good family, friends, financial security, children, beauty. Do you agree? Do our external circumstances determine if we have a good life? Or can we have a good life by becoming independent of external circumstances?…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Epicurus's Definition Of Happiness
    • 170 Words
    • 1 Page

    Epicurus's Definition Of Happiness

    Epicurus had a slightly different definition of happiness which was linked with the principle of hedonism. Actually, Epicurus believed that happiness was pleasure (Miller 607). One of the theory of hedonism is that everyone wants to be happy and what makes people happy is pleasure. Epicurus believed that people should then seek it. Finding pleasure means that all desires must be satisfied (Miller 607). Epicurus thought there were three types of desires: natural and necessary, vain and empty and natural, but not necessary. Also, he mentioned that happiness was self-sufficient (Miller 608). Everyone has what it takes to makes them happy inside of them. This ancient philosopher considered that some people are able to adjust their desires depending…

    • 170 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Epicurus's Philosophy Of Happiness
    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Epicurus's Philosophy Of Happiness

    Many things have changed since Epicurus wrote on his philosophy of happiness around 307 BC, but in this century we can still obtain happiness as long as we have Epicurus’ three foundations of freedom, friendship and an analyzed life. He says that happiness does not come from money and money is not required to obtain happiness as long as the essentials are met. (de Botton, ND) There is comfort taken in the ideas of Epicurus because the three things needed for happiness can be accessed by everyone. The philosophy of Epicurus is not as prominently applied in this century as it should be and our society could benefit if more people in the twenty-first century followed the ideas of Epicurus, but everyone needs to be offered of choice to apply this…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics