Arguments Against Marijuana

The subject of marijuana is a very charged topic, both politically and socially. Because of its status as a DSM IV Schedule One drug, much of the arguments for or against marijuana use have been the result of speculation and anecdotes. Recently, however, scientists have been able to study the molecular biology of some of the chemicals in marijuana and elucidate some of the biochemical pathways which they affect. Despite the intense controversy surrounding the subject, there have been quite a few breakthroughs in the past decade. The most notable being the identification of the endogenous cannabinoid ligand. In social and political discussions one often hears two extreme opinions on opposite ends of the spectrum with regard to this subject. Some people feel that marijuana is a dangerous drug which should be kept at its current status as a Schedule One controlled substance. Others feel that the drug should be made available for both medical and recreational purposes.
Others assert that it causes memory loss or cancer. Unfortunately, most people are unable to point to scientific research to back up their claims on either side if the debate. This is due to several reasons: not enough research has been done on the subject, many people have extreme biases, and many people are ignorant to the research that has been done. The fact of the matter is we still know very little about the possible dangers or benefits of marijuana. At this point in time, both of the previously mentioned views are probably unacceptable until further research is done. It is the goal of this paper to outline and explain the current status of research related to marijuana and discuss some of the implications. In doing so, perhaps some of the myths about marijuana will be