Preview

Arguments Against Gun Control Reform

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
951 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Arguments Against Gun Control Reform
With the growing number of mass shootings in America and violence around the world, the issue of gun control reform has been widely debated across all political parties. The arguments against reform almost always boil down to citing the constitution's second amendment; the right for citizens to keep and bear arms, whereas proponents of reform suggest the installment of new laws ranging anywhere to a simple mental screening before a person is given a license to complete withdrawal and ban on any form of assault weapons and guns, citing that it is far too easy for an individual to purchase a weapon and ammunition and then proceed to shoot middle school students and their teachers. In any case the topic is more complicated than either side will …show more content…
While they do raise a reasonable point, the NRA unintentionally create the question, if criminals can find a way to get anything, then why should we make anything illegal? For instance, the making and distribution of bombs and other explosives is regulated. People who make or distribute explosives must have special licenses and be screened, and the same goes for anyone who buys explosive materials. Not only that but certain explosive materials are carefully and anyone buying large or suspicious amounts are immediately flagged. Should the monitoring and restriction of explosive materials be done away with entirely because criminals and terrorists can and do find ways to get them? No, by restricting the access and monitoring the traffic of explosive materials law enforcement are not only able to more quickly catch criminals; the constant alert also discourages other would-be criminals from trying to create bombs in effect stopping crimes before they even begin. While applying the same reform would not stop all criminals from getting assault weapons, it is important to recognize and not discount the fact that the practice would still reduce crime and save many …show more content…
An argument used many times against gun is that bans on assault weapons and large magazines simply don't work 2). However for many countries around the world this statement is entirely false. In the United Kingdom, Japan, South Korea, and Australia, not only do all of these countries have strict gun laws but they also have the lowest death by gun rates, violent and accidental. In Australia during the 1980's the Prime Minister at the time initiated wide sweep of gun control. Since the 1970s Australia had had thirteen "mass shootings”; in the almost thirty years since the enactment of their gun control reform laws Australia has not had a single mass

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    One of the major arguments against guns and conceal carry laws, is that with a lack thereof, it would cut the number of criminal homicides. In the current state of our country, mass shootings have become a normal situation that must be prepared for. Men and women carrying dangerous weapons with a desire to create chaos. However, there is more than one way to kill a cat. Guns do not give off this ambition to become destructive and violent. People are the ones pulling the trigger, their desires have nothing to do with the firearm. Yes, guns are powerful and destructive, but only in the wrong hands. With the right training and attitude, handguns can be used to protect families and be a safety blanket until necessary to use. Eliminating guns would…

    • 180 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Anit-Gun Control

    • 1769 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The gun control debate is more than just a two-sided argument about should guns be legal or banned. It is an argument about the Second Amendment, it’s interpretation and whether it…

    • 1769 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Imagine the world without guns, less crime, less murder and the children from the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting would still be here today. Guns pose serious threats to ordinary New Zealanders. It’s quite simple no guns, no gun violence.…

    • 338 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    On the contrary, opponents of gun-control laws claim that it is useless to prevent violence by regulating guns. In fact, law-abiding citizens are already permitted to carry concealed weapons in forty states with gun crimes rate remaining the same (Wright). In my opinion, with guns thousands of citizens could save their lives. Just like Jessica, they gain courage because guns are available to them when emergencies occur.…

    • 415 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It has been a proven fact that the states with stricter gun control have increased the crime rate by a lot. That is happening because some people still have guns and the government are disarming everybody else which makes it easier to rob store gas stations and banks. “Although guns killed 35,957 people in 1995 the guns didn’t pull the trigger people did.”(Schmittroth 3) Most of those killings were from having gun control. If we got rid of gun control it would reduce the amount of crimes that go on in the United States. Most of the guns in the United States protect lives more than they take lives. But that only happens when there is no gun control. And handguns are perfect for women to keep in there purse to have for self-defense. But the government is trying to pass gun control which will leave most of the women defenseless. Which bad thing is that approximately 200,000 women in the United States use guns to protect themselves from sexual crimes every single year. And guns prevent more injures than they…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pro Gun Control

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages

    With the Second Amendment giving American citizens the right to bear arms, and approximately fifty percent of Americans owning some form of a firearm, issues involving the ownership and possession of guns has led to debates in American society. Many feel that the some form of gun regulation is necessary in order to lower the level of gun related violence in the country. On the other hand, the opponents of gun control feel that it would be an infringement on their second amendment rights. The outcome and extent of gun control has strong political implications because it basically determines the present day meaning of the Second Amendment. While each side has strong points. Today, based on the number of crimes and violent acts committed with guns, society needs more gun control.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gun Control Arguments

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    on assault rifles is unconstitutional. Joseph Sobran, an American journalist and writer analyzes the amendment: "The Second Amendment, whatever else it means, clearly forbids the federal government to ‘infringe’ that right” (par. 8). The federal government has taken away that right by limiting assault rifles. First, nowhere in the Constitution is the federal government granted to right to limit an individual’s right to own firearms. On the contrary, the Second Amendment expressly grants this right to all citizens, making all gun control laws unconstitutional. James Madison said in No. 45 of The Federalist Papers, "The powers of the federal government were to be ‘few and defined.’ The supposed federal power to regulate guns is anything but ‘defined’;…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The gun control laws do not solve the real problem which is the gun owner. Even if we have strict gun control laws that doesn’t mean the crime rates will go down or the school shooting will stop. If a criminal wants to kill someone they don’t have to have a gun to go through with it. It is just as easy to grab a knife or make a small bomb. Most criminals that want to shoot and murder people already have lengthy records and wouldn’t be able to pass a background check if they tried to purchase a gun legally. And even if the criminal does have a clean enough back ground to purchase a gun, one study reveals that most of them fear purchasing a gun legally because they know that it could be easily traced back to them. Instead the people we should be trying to stop are buying their guns on the black market. Most of the criminals that were interviewed during the study even distrusted so called internet sales on guns because they feared they were sting operations and they’d wind up trying to buy one from and ATF…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gun Control

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The debate over gun control continues to plague our country. On one side, there is the National Rifle Association (NRA) and 2nd Amendment-citing citizens who use their firearms for hunting and self-defense. On the other, there is the Handgun Control Inc. (HCI) and followers of the Brady Campaign who want to ban guns on the basis that they are dangerous. The Brady Administration passed a bill that requires individuals seeking to buy a gun at a licensed dealer pass a background check. Because guns are especially lethal weapons, it makes sense that before someone can own one, he or she meets the legal requirements for ownership. This simple step protects everyone, gun owners and non-gun owners, from the danger of high-risk people gaining access to lethal weapons. Both sides have strong arguments, anchored in historical precedent and statistical analysis. Anti-gun control lobbyists’ arguments include the guarantee of the 2nd Amendment, the definition of “militia” as any adult male, self-defense, the relative uselessness of permits and regulations, and court cases in favor of firearm possession.…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There has been a lot of talk about banning guns lately. There are already many laws on the books that regulate gun ownership. However, criminals need not worry as the black market has no such regulations, and will sell to anyone with the cash to purchase guns. Banning guns is not only unconstitutional, it is an ineffective strategy to combat gun violence. There is nothing preventing anyone from going to any public places and start shooting. If you take away gun rights from those who go through the legal motions then there will be more casualties in the event of a shooting. Guns should be permitted to be carried by persons of verified integrity in gun free zones where the greatest risk of casualties…

    • 125 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Banning guns is an issue today that is very difficult to talk about, especially when it concerns mass shooting or anything alike. I side with the second opposing argument. The first argument talks about theoretical things that can never happen. Instead, the second argument talks about a real solution to the problem. The solution to “ boost the defensive capacities of prospective victims.” This is more realistic in my opinion. They both talk about how it is inevitable and how there is basically nothing we can do to stop someone from killing people if they really want to. If I were to add to each argument I strongly add upon the statement above. I believe no matter what if someone wants a gun they will find a gun, whether its legal or not. If…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the course of recent years, Americans' backing for inflexible firearm control laws has been for the most part declining even as the quantity of mass shootings is on the ascent. Weapon control is a standout amongst the most forcefully divisive issues in the U.S. today.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Need to Live - The Need to Ban Guns Last year, about 50,000 Americans died from gun-inflicted injuries. Guns are, non-arguably, designed to kill. Carrying of guns has been a major topic of discussion and argument over the past several years and it has gotten no where close to a solution. Guns should be banned.…

    • 516 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Guns are a nuisance, an inconvenience that breeds terror. They have been a part of U.S. history for centuries. They were valuable assets in great wars, but they have always been one and the same with bloodshed. Guns are a “God-given natural right” in the United States, we have the right to bear arms, despite it not being 1791 anymore. Guns and their supporters have given rise to controversies that dispute the worthiness of the firearm in recent years. The truth is that guns are not what they were in the eighteenth century. Guns have evolved into powerful weapons that seem to only cause pain and confusion, guns should be left in the past. People have not stopped using guns from being linked to crime in the country, nor have they stopped themselves…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    i have no power

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Fantasists and zealots can be found on both sides of the debate over guns in America. On the one hand, many gun-rights advocates reject even the most sensible restrictions on the sale of weapons to the public. On the other, proponents of stricter gun laws often seem unable to understand why a good person would ever want ready access to a loaded firearm. Between these two extremes we must find grounds for a rational discussion about the problem of gun violence.…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays