Argumentative Essay On Assisted Suicide

People frequently question the ethics surrounding assisted suicide and worry that widespread legalization will cause serious problems for the U.S. Opponents believe that physicians shouldn’t be allowed to help a terminally ill patient end their life. They contend that assisted suicide corrupts the practice of medicine and the doctor-patient relationship. Medicine was designed for the purpose of healing who are in pain. Opponents argue that doctors are supposed to heal patients by prescribing the proper medication, not assist in killing them. Additionally, opponents claim that assisted suicide undermines the integrity of medical professionals. For instance, a physician may feel obligated to help a terminally ill patient die, which may
7). Many times, opponents refer to the fact that doctors frequently misdiagnose the terminally ill. This inaccurate information could lead to a patient choosing assisted suicide, and prematurely ending their life (Assisted Suicide, par. 6). Furthermore, critics worry that insurance companies may persuade terminally ill patients to hasten their deaths. Assisted suicide is the cheapest treatment option, and would save insurance companies a significant amount of money. Therefore, insurance companies may offer to pay for assisted suicide, but not life prolonging treatment (Right to Die, pg. 8). Finally, people who oppose assisted suicide refer to the potential abuse of the elderly and people with disabilities. They worry that these vulnerable members of society may be convinced into ending their, in order to lessen the burden on their families (Right to Die, pg 2). Additionally, opponents argue that there aren’t any safeguards for terminally ill patients who suffer from depression. Opponents of assisted suicide support Hospice care, and believe it’s a better alternative for those suffering from incurable diseases. Hospice is desined to provide support and care to terminally ill patients and their loved ones, during the