Argument Against Racial Profiling

Living in a world of uncertainty law enforcement officials must be equipped with necessary tools to protect themselves and those around them. Behavior and body language speak a universal language understood by almost anyone. If an individual is suspicious chances are that their behavior will show it in many forms such as heavy sweating, and/or no eye contact when spoken too. However, racial and/or criminal profiling isn’t always exactly fair to the individuals under suspicion however if conducted appropriately can be effective in weaving through possible suspects moreover, identify and prevent future possible criminal activity. Furthermore, necessary security measure to pick up the slack where other security measures have failed. Looking a racial profiling through this lends in a sense is smart law enforcement. Knowing that potential risk comes from a specific group of individual’s behaviors, actions, and body language logically reinforces to focus on that specific group of individuals.
Beginning con’s to Racial Profiling
Naturally, racism is embedded in society; moreover, historically as human selfishness, enslaving, and advantage in efforts to be superior to other races. Social constructs in efforts to change this view
In theory, the building block of the justice system is that everyone received equal and fair treatment moreover, innocent until proven guilty. However, when racial profiling individuals are already presumed to be guilty. The risks outweigh the benefits associated with racial profiling because it violates the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment civil right, and fails to promote law enforcement. Unfair subjection of racial profiling towards minorities is embarrassing, humiliating and ineffective form or racial