Preview

are you dead are nah?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
701 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
are you dead are nah?
Dayrel Whittaker
Mr. Grayshirt
English III
3 April 2014
Are You Dead or Nah?
“If an eye-for-an eye is good enough for God, then it is good enough for republicans,” says Armstrong Williams. God believes punishment for our sins and choices is okay, so the republicans believe it’s necessary for capital punishment for capital crimes. There are different things that come into play when determining whether or not someone should receive capital punishment. If a criminal commits a capital then he deserves the consequences whether it is mild or death.
There is always question about whether or not it is constitutional to give someone the sentence or death row. Is sentencing someone to death moral? Could that be considered a sin? People sometimes think about that when deciding to give capital punishment. Conservatives have had strong views on crime. The criminals are becoming more violent and less trustworthy. Therefore, they deserve what they get (Armstrong Williams). Liberals believe that criminals only do what is expected of them, but everybody has a choice on what they want to do. The death penalty has a purpose. Well everything the government does has some intentional purpose whether it turns out good or bad. The purpose though is to maintain social order. Now, what they try to say that the death penalty is affected by prejudice and most of the people put on death row are African Americans. That might be true but if you want to get rid of it for that reason then you would have to decrease or get rid of the amount of time in prison. The question of morality isn’t based off whether or not someone’s decision was made because of their prejudice towards someone. The question is whether it is actively legal for the state to take another person’s life. Some try to say that it is a violation of the sanctity of life when giving some one the death penalty through “legal” injection but people violates life’s sanctity by going out and committing capital crimes even though

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pt1420 Unit 6 Paper

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The arguments for the death penalty consists of Americans feeling a strong sense of justice that demands retribution for heinous crimes, or ‘a life for a life’. The death penalty shows that society doesn’t excuse the taking of innocent lives and that a jail sentence for murder wouldn’t be suffice for the life of an innocent victim. Arguments against the death penalty involve people who believe it is applied unequally, because a large proportion of those executed have been poor, uneducated, and nonwhite. My outlook on it is that I’m in-between the death penalty, yes I understand that a murder should be able to live on this Earth, but having to kill by something like legal injection is an unusual…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    According to the Capital Punishment article in Britannica, the definition of death penalty is “ the execution of an offender who has been sentenced to death by the court of law after conviction of a criminal offense by the court of law”(Capital punishment 2016). Some organizations that support the death penalty are Republicans and Lawyers. Some groups that oppose the death penalty include Democrats and the National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty. Some court cases about the death penalty are Furman v Georgia.I in this court case the Georgia Supreme Court found Will henry Furman guilty of murder and sentenced him to death but the US supreme court thought in his case that putting him to death violated the 8th and 14th amendments and…

    • 245 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Most people inhibit morals and hold different classes of ethics, which plays heavily in choosing between right and wrong or fair and unfair. These decisions grow more difficult as time goes on. When considering which Supreme Court case I wanted to research, the thought of picking the death penalty topic originally swayed me. I did not want to pick such a controversial subject, but I grew more and more intrigued as I read deeper into the case of Gregg vs. Georgia in 1976. The case stirred up many views about capital punishment and allowing a criminal to manipulate the wording of our country’s Constitution to refuse personal responsibility. Throughout the research and trying to form an opinion of the case, I wondered if the death penalty is:…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Genesis 9:6: "Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man." They believe that capital punishment was created by God and man didn't have the right to oppose. However, the bible also talks about an eye for an eye. This proverb means one cannot get even with one who harmed them. The government supports killing a murderer as a punishment for him committing murder. It is a double standard and ineffective. (Vollum, S., Longmire, D. R., & Buffington-Vollum, J)…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    No Choirboy Pros And Cons

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Moral judgment is a difficult thing; so many people can disagree because there is no right or wrong answer. This topic has been a big debate for a while each state has adopted their own way of doing things. The death penalty is illegal in 16 states. The death penalty is usually used for murder but there has been other case such as aggravated rape but most of the time they get a life sentence for crimes other than murder. In cases of serious crimes you always don’t get the death penalty sometimes you get hard time to a life sentence which can be hard on a person because of the many flaws of the prison system.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Society demands that punishment should fix the harm it has done. By sentencing a person to death no harm has been fixed. As long as capital punishment exists in our society it will continue to spark the injustice, which it has failed to curb. The death penalty is morally and socially unethical, should be construed as cruel and unusual punishment, has no proof of acting as deterrent, and risks the appalling and unacceptable injustice of executing innocent people. It does not matter who does the killing as long as a life is taken by another, it should always be considered…

    • 1955 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many look upon this topic as a religious moral issue. The National Coalition against Death Penalty states that “the death penalty devalues all human life- eliminating the possibility for transformation of human spirit.” This organization also states that the death penalty “is fallible and irrevocable” , their studies show that over 100 inmates have been released from death row after new technological testing regarding their cases found them to be innocent.(1) On the reverse side of this religious outlook, there are those such as J. Melton that believe, the death penalty was started by God, himself when wrote in the bible, “He that killeth by the sword must be killed by the sword.”(Revelations 13:10). (2) There have been studies by Emory University professors, in 2003, state that each execution deters an average of 18 murders. A similar study in 2004 stated that it is believed that speeding up execution would strengthen deterrent effect. For every 2.75 years cut from time spent on death row it is said that 1 murder would be prevented. Another aspect of the death penalty is that of those who believe that rehabilitation is ineffective and capital punishment is the only punishments that is equivalent to some of the violent offenses committed and think that it is a way for closure for the families of the victims.(3) In my opinion, I believe that it is not just a…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Recently, there has been talk amongst many Americans about whether or not the “death penalty” should be outlawed in the United States. Although the crime may be unforgivable, no one should have the right to decide whether or not a person’s life should be stripped away, because nothing is more important than a person’s life. There are many reasons why the death penalty should be outlawed, one reason is that many criminals put on trial may face discrimination, and receive a bias punishment. Another reason is that the death penalty is very costly and that the alternative, life without parole, is a much cheaper and easier solution. The death penalty also reflects the moral standing of today's society. Nobody can justify taking another person’s…

    • 1055 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The most severe form of punishment of all legal sentences is that of death. This is referred to as the death penalty, or capital punishment; this is the most severe form of corporal punishment, requiring law enforcement officers to actually kill the offenders. It has been banned in numerous countries, in the United States, however an earlier move to eliminate capital punishment has now been reserved and more and more states are resorting to capital punishment for such serious offenders namely murder. "Lex talionis," mentioned by the Bible encourages "An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth" mentality, and people have been using it regularly for centuries. We use it in reference to burglary, adultery, and various other situations, although, some people enforce it on a different level, some people use it in reference to death. An individual may steal from those who have stolen from him, or an individual wrongs those who have wronged him, but should an individual have the right to kill to seek retaliation? Four issues are on the hot topic in the United States, stirring up America's feeling towards this issue. There is controversy debating capital punishment today and whether or not it works, or if it is morally right. We have a certain privilege in our own lives, but should the lives of others belong to us as well? Do we have the right to decide on the lives of others; of people we may not even know? If we find someone guilty of murder, we sentence him to death. This makes us murders ourselves, but is there possibility in justifying these acts? Those who assist in the death penalty; are they not partners in crime? Is death penalty a cruel and unusual punishment or is it now just a necessary tool in the war on crime?…

    • 2731 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are few policies that produce as much debate, controversy and emotion in this country as the death penalty. Capital punishment has been around in this country since colonial times when people were killed for practicing witchcraft and today the death penalty is legal in 31 states. Since 1976, 1414 people have been executed in the U.S. (deathpenaltyinfo.org). People who favor capital punishment believe that if someone brutally take's another person's life then they should lose their own right to life. However, in taking a closer look at the death penalty, there are many problems associated with it such as that is is morally wrong, the botching of executions, the execution of innocent people, and the fact that it is a flawed system…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some may claim that the death penalty is just, and others claim it is inhumane. I think that the death penalty can be substituted by a sentence to life in prison. Supporters may say that murderers don’t deserve mercy and that they deserve to die. But what they forget is that though they may have killed someone, they are humans too. In addition, most murders are committed under the influence of drugs or alcohol, or by someone who is mentally ill. Criminals are commonly drug and alcohol abusers. So when they commit a crime under the influence, we should automatically put them to death instead of trying to rehabilitate them to help them be a productive member of society? That just doesn’t sound right.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Some people are against the killing of others for any reasons. Other people feel that certain crimes should be punished by death. The death penalty is a very controversial topic in the United States today and has been for a number of years, because people's life is at risk. The reviewing the numbers of facts prove that the death penalty should not be enforced. I think death penalty is the ultimate denial of human rights. It violates the right to life as proclaimed in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. It is the ultimate cruel, inhuman, and degrading punishment. It should be abolished in this country it's racial discrimination, the financial cost and barbarity.…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Death Penalty In America

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The death penalty in the United States of America is a topic that many people could have both negative and positive reactions toward. Everyday there is a murder being made, whether it's a small type of crime or a large type of crime. Someone gets killed and justice is either served or not, depending if the murderer is caught. Some say we live in a freedom type where we are free to do whatever we want. However, that is not the case. There are laws in the United States that citizens of must follow and comprehend in order to not receive punishment. That type of punishment can vary based on the type of crime which had took place.…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Capital punishment is embedded on an offender in case or a murder, drug trafficking, rape of a minor, treason, espionage, and few others. There are many questions that can be asked concerning this issue. Some are: Does it affect your religion? Do you believe it deters crime? Is the cost of the death penalty worth it? Is it humane? Noted in interviewing on these questions, most of the people say that the death penalty does not deter crime, that it is against their religion, it is a humane way to kill people, and that the cost is not worth it. For the most part the people whom were interviewed believe that the offenders who have committed capital crimes should just be put in jail for life instead of being put on the death…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the Constitution, the Founding Fathers stated every person has inalienable rights. The Constitution grants humans the rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. The dictionary defines inalienable as “impossible to take away or give up.” Meaning, the government has no right to take those freedoms away from us. Supreme Court Justice Stephen Beyer believes the death penalty has many defects that make it unconstitutional. He believes, “The death penalty is unreliable, it is arbitrary and there are delays that undermine the purpose.” (Heyns). On another note, using the lethal injection can be very inhumane, which is why many believe capital punishment is unconstitutional. One author sheds light on how gruesome lethal injection can be, “In 2014 the lethal injection took 40 minutes to kill Oklahoma inmate Clayton Derrell.” (Heyns). Many countries have outlawed the use of capital…

    • 917 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays