Preview

Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Cons

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
267 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Cons
For years there has been an environmental debate on whether oil drilling should begin in the largest refuge in the United States, Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge [ANWR]. High potential for oil within the refuge is estimated but the environmental impacts of oil drilling is harmful and destructive. Oil drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife refuge has pros and cons, however, cons are more significant as it deals with the environment and animals rather than politics and the economy. Pollution is a major consequence of oil drilling, oil spills are also a critical concern that would be devastating to the environment and the animals. Another major concern is climate change as an effect of pollution. The refuge provides a habitat in which

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Imagine a forest with unnatural beauty: green trees, a wide variety of wildlife, clean water from streams, and the sound of migrating birds flying overhead. Now imagine that same exact forest with tar sands oil running through it: wilting trees, bone-thin wildlife suffocating from the fumes, and streams covered in brown and black oil. Jonathan Waldman, an environmental journalist at the University of Colorado, published an article that argued that the Keystone XL pipeline should be built because it is the safest way to move tar sands oil, does not affect the environment and climate, and creates effective jobs. However, that is not the case. The Keystone XL Pipeline is actually a dangerous way to move oil from Point A to Point B, affects the environment negatively, and does not create effective jobs.…

    • 1319 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Alaskan National Wilderness Refuge has been the topic of political debate for decades. A large, beautiful piece of the world, ANWR as it is often referred to, is not a only a refuge for hundreds of species of birds, fish and mammals, but also a political battleground that is used to ignite the debate on America’s dependence on foreign fuel sources. The possibility of drilling for oil in ANWR brings with it the promise of jobs, dependency from unstable countries for our fuel needs and a boost to our declining economy. However, drilling in this land also brings the possibility of destroying the habitat of birds that migrate to this area yearly, caribou that use this haven as a calving ground, fish that fill the rivers and lakes, as well as grizzly bears, wolves, elk and hundreds of other species that depend on this habitat for food, shelter and safety. There is no debate that there are passionate debates, important facts and amazing possibilities that concern both sides of this argument. And even if it were possible to remove political agenda from the table, it would still be a very difficult debate to win for either side. My hopes are to come to a conclusion that would benefit both parties involved. I strongly feel that any drilling in this area would be detrimental to the surrounding area, as well as bring possible harm to the countless animals, birds and fish that use this safe haven yearly for migration, calving and egg laying and feeding. The decision to either drill or not to drill may not have a direct impact on us now, but in the years to come, good or bad, we will all see the changes that this decision will have resulted in.…

    • 2026 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Abstract. The topic of global oil production is becoming a well-recognized political issue, as it should, but the environmental impacts need to be addressed as well. The recent development project of the Canadian oil sands has been put into the spotlight after the TransCanada Company applied for a permit allowing their Keystone XL pipeline.…

    • 2539 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The tundra may seem tough, but it’s actually a very sensitive environment. People have started moving to the tundra to work in the mines and oil industry. Because of this, developments have interrupted many of the animals’ migrations and feeding patterns. It has also caused damage to the permafrost. We need to be careful with the tundra…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In my opinion drilling shouldn't be Allow in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge because it is more of an environmental issue. Due to the fact that oil and gas exploration and development in the (ANWR) would have a major effect on the water resource. It is most concerning because it’s a factor that contributes, negatively towards a wide variety of species that are inhabitant of that particular area that are being affected by limited resource of water that they need for their survival. The reason drilling is an issue because it can alter the character of an ecosystem. For example Arctic ecosystem is characterized by many complex interactions, and changes to one component may have secondary but significant effects on other ecosystem components. Which means oil exploration and development have substantially changed environments where they have occurred in Alaska’s central Arctic. Another reason drill is an issue because of factor that comes into play when drilling occurs such as oil spills, contaminated waste, and other sources of pollution have had measurable impacts on an environment. Like the Exxon Valdez spill in Alaska and the more recent Deep-water Horizon spill in the Gulf of Mexico. These disasters have displayed that there is no safe way to drill for oil and gas in the Arctic refuge, no way to guarantee wildlife will not be harmed by resource extraction in the refuge and no way to ensure the Arctic refuge will be protected for future generations and if Congress allows oil and gas exploration on the coastal plain there are costly consequences that wildlife have to endure. Oil drilling presents a potential risk of oil spills; in the Arctic the impacts of such spills could be catastrophic. Spills are more dangerous here because the combination of a colder climate, slower plant growth rates and longer animal life spans hinder recovery efforts. Additionally, no technology currently…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    If the Keystone XL pipeline is built, thousands of creatures may relocate or die because of it. The Keystone pipeline is a real pipeline that will transport thousands of gallons of crude tar sands oil a day from Canada to the southern United States. It may leak and cause the environment to be hurt. Many people believe that it will benefit the United States and Canada in many ways, but many people believe the other side of it and think it should not be built because of the risks. It has many benefits, but there is too much of a risk involved in the building of the keystone pipeline. The pipeline should not be built because it is bad for the environment, bad for the economy, and may go through native lands.…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    With methods such as fracking being used to excavate the oil that is used today, damage done to the environment and different species of animals is inevitable with controversial methods. As an example of damage done to the environment, a very impactful incident which affected the Gulf of Mexico in 2010 was the explosion of the Deepwater Horizon. The Deepwater Horizon was an oil rig which exploded and caused massive damage among the surrounding…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During recent years, the oil-sands industry in Alberta has created a vast network of roads and processing plants in an effort to manufacture oil from the bitumen. Studies and reports have shown the environmental impacts resulted from this unconventional oil production. This article discusses some of the issues raised by the environmental groups, including loss of habitat/biodiversity, pollution, and human health concerns in the oil development…

    • 4409 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the main complaints is that “Offshore drilling poses environmental risks.” Yes the environmental danger of off shore drilling gradually has affected our wild lives and fish stocks. Researchers argue that this is not just a short-term effect because the remaining species can obtain new diseases and not be able to fight them because of lower heterozygosity index. In addition they are afraid that it will lead to the extinction of a variety of species.…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The hazards for wildlife include toxic effects of exposure or ingestion, injuries such as smothering and deterioration of thermal insulation, and damage to their reproductive systems and behaviors. Long-term ecological effects that contaminate or destroy the marine organic substrate and thereby interrupt the food chain are also harmful to the wildlife, so species populations may change or disappear”. The article meant that a lot of species that had been swimming, sitting , or even breathing in the oil had taken a turn for the worst and had been badly injured or most likely died which is one of the major effects that could continue to grow if nothing is…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, or ANWR, is a refuge geared toward preserving national wildlife in northeastern Alaska. ANWR is about 19 million acres, in space, and contains a potential drilling spot for oil and petroleum. The potential drilling spot is a small area known as the 10-02 Area. It is only 1.5 million acres, or 8%, of ANWR, would even be considered for development (What is ANWR). The controversy surrounding ANWR is whether to drill or not to drill into the 10-02 area. Some people want to preserve the wilderness and to find more fuel-efficient technologies. Others want to lower gas prices and to create more job opportunities. If the government decides to drill for oil, it could possibly lead to about 17 billion barrels of oil, to last the United States for the next 20 years.…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There’s something about the way trees form a thick canopy over a quiet forest that whispers of barely contained power. The wilderness seems to hold its breath and hide its secrets amidst the incursions of curious humans. However, the lucky few, such as former president Jimmy Carter, are made privy to the innermost workings of Mother Earth’s mysteries through their time in nature. Ink becomes paint, pages become canvases and Carter becomes an artist in his impassioned foreword to, ‘Arctic National Wildlife Refuge: Seasons of Life and Land, A Photographic Journey’. In an effort to convince readers the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge should not be developed for industry, Carter utilizes powerful imagery…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There’s rather a lot of controversy today about how we should use lands that have the government designated as wilderness. For some, these wilderness can be the best treatment to unwind after a day of hard work. For others, we can use the wilderness to relieve the stress placed on our government. Despite this debate, there are certain events that could have been avoided had the government addressed some key issues when designating a wilderness. In order to target land for wilderness designation, key issues must first be considered, such as the effect on the nation, the effect on the people, and who will get the final say about the use of the wilderness.…

    • 684 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Oil Drilling in Alaska

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages

    George W. Bush was a strong supporter for the drilling in Alaska. His argument for being pro drilling is that it will help our economy. Many new jobs would be created and that America would be less dependent on foreign sources of energy. This will improve America's economy which has took a plunge over the last few years. He also said that with all the studies that ANWR ( Arctic National Wildlife Refuge) has done that scientists have created was of drilling for the oil with having barely any effect on the earth. If this is true that means that most of the people who were opposed to it, because it would destroy wildlife, would be happy. The area that the drilling would be done in makes up only 8 percent of the whole refuge.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Offshore Oil Drilling

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Offshore oil drilling is slowly destroying our environment. Over the past few years following the tragic oil spill in the gulf,…

    • 667 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays