Preview

ArcelorMittal Porter 5

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
832 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
ArcelorMittal Porter 5
ssPorter’s 5 forces analysis for Arcelor Mittal
1. Competitive rivalry:
Industry rivalry is high: Arcelor Mittal is still ranked no. 1 in the world top steelmakers (World SteelAssociation, 2013) with a reported 96.1 tonesof crude steel in 2013, higher than 93.6 tones in 2012. In 2014 Arcelo Mittal produced around 119 tones crude steel, it is present in 22 countries, all over the world. Ranked no.2 is Nippon Steel & Sumimoto Metal Corporation, with 50.1 tones crude steel in 2013. However, many companies, such as: global steel producers and US based steel companies: US Steel Corporation, Nucor Corporation and Reliance Steel & Aluminium. are consistently growing competition operating on the same markets as Arcelor Mittal.
Increased competition comes from global exporters, such as major Chinese steel producers. These companies, which delivered the necessary steel products to the local growing market, are facing the recent slowdown of Chinese economy and therefore started to search for other markets and started to export globally, becoming the first exporter in the world, often dictating the market price.
Increased competition from smaller competitors, mainly those using mini-mills.
Many Chinese companies consolidated to form more powerful groups, such as Tianjin Bohai Steel in 2013, ranked no. 15, while other companies merged and became stronger. However, there are still small companies that represent a threat for Arcelor Mittal because they are more flexible and have lower costs.
Products are rather similar, this fact resulting in intense competition to get large contracts from key users. Lately, the focus of steel producers was on developing franchises, or trying to produce specialised products for key users. High competition determined minimal costs for buyers to switch from a producer to the other. In the same time, the industry, including Arcelor Mittal, operated under its capacity.
High exit barriers make steel producers continue to struggle for a market share,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Print ECN 340

    • 586 Words
    • 1 Page

    The opening of an economy to world trade automatically puts local manufacturers at risk of steep competition from cheap…

    • 586 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    New competitors can attempt to enter the aerospace market, primarily in China. China is known to have little industrial regulation and their companies may have reduced barriers to entry.…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Slade Plating Department

    • 1903 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Also, the competition between existing players in this industry is high. There are about 619,000 metal enterprises in the USA in 2005 (IBISWorld, 2007).There are many companies that produce different kinds of metal products in the market. Besides, the bargaining power of buyers is high because product difference for the buyers of the metal products is small. It is not easy to differentiate the quality of one metal product from another. In addition, the cost of switching for the buyers is low. The number of substitutes of metal products is also high thus the buyers have great bargaining power.…

    • 1903 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    China are the world’s biggest exporter and second biggest in importers. This status is relevant because the North American and European economies suffered from the crisis in 2008-2009 and other countries needed an exporter country. China didn’t suffer from the crisis and showed potential. Countries exported to China and this helped the global recession from being worse. Also due to an increased activity of trade China is involved in, it has motivated a South to South trade.…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2

    • 262 Words
    • 1 Page

    1. A larger market base simply equates to potentially more capital and larger profits. And the same can be said about importing products from China; A cheaper manufacturing base simply equates to potentially more capital and larger profits. A billion plus consumers that are hungry for imported Western products also Western consumers hungry for inexpensive exported products from China.…

    • 262 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    1. Discuss the trends in the steel industry and how it may impact Nucor’s strategy…

    • 1702 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ArcelorMittal is a global steel company; it is the largest steel producing company in the world and is the market leader in steel for use in automotive, construction, household appliances and packaging. It holds sizeable captive supplies of raw materials and operates extensive distribution networks. Arcelor and Mittal merged in 2007 and decided to enter the market of the Near and the Middle East. Moreover, ArcelorMittal key financials for 2007 show revenues of US$105.2 billion, with a crude steel production of 116 million tons.…

    • 2940 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lincoln Electric

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The two most important issues that Lincoln Electric is faced with are as follows. First, the inability to meet customer demand because of the shortages in supply creates opportunities for competing firms to enter the industry. What resources and capabilities does Lincoln Electric have that can mitigate this threat of entry. Second, the emphasis put on the monetary incentive plan leaves the company vulnerable in economic hardships. How can Lincoln Electric continue to encourage competition and quality without a high emphasis on monetary incentives?…

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Arcelor-Mittal Case Study

    • 4189 Words
    • 17 Pages

    CASE STUDY ARCELOR-MITTAL MERGER: CHALLENGING INTEGRATION OF TWO STEEL GIANTS’ ORGANIZATIONAL IDENTITIES Preamble In the aftermath of one of this century's most remarkable mergers, we find two different cultures, two different worlds, thrown into one of history's largest corporate integrations. On the one hand, there is Mittal Steel - the largest producer of steel in terms of volume. Despite the fact that Mittal steel is based in Netherlands, it is perceived that the company is non-European because its CEO Lakshmi Mittal is Indian. On the other hand, there is Arcelor - headquartered in Luxembourg and created through the merger of three steel companies - Aceralia, Arbed and Usinor. In 2005, Arcelor had revenues of 32 billion Euros. Arcelor management was extremely hostile to Mittal Steel’s bid from the beginning because it believed that Arcelor itself would have been doing the acquisitions and not the other way around. Arcelor repeatedly played the patriotic card in order for shareholders to reject the bid. The CEO of Arcelor dismissed Mittal Steel as a “company of Indians” and unworthy of taking over a European company (all this despite the fact that most industry analysts and investment banks pointing out that the deal was in Arcelor’s best interests). The French government (despite not being a shareholder) was against the deal because of worries over its 28000 Arcelor employees. Despite repeated assurances from Mittal that the deal would not lead to layoffs the government of France was never convinced. The government of Luxembourg (a stakeholder) was against the deal as well for a variety of reasons. The European Union approved of the Mittal-Arcelor deal. So many questions, so many uncertainties, and only a few months to sort them all out and forge a new identity that will define the future of the steel industry worldwide. Will they succeed? At what cost?…

    • 4189 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mittal Steel began in the early 1970’s as a small, family owned company, based in India. However, due to a range of restrictive government regulations and tough competitiveness from SAIL (a state-owned firm) and Tata Steel (a large privately owned firm), Mittal Steel believed that the best projection of growth of the company would transpire outside of India. In 1975, Mittal Steel began expanding across national borders by creating and building a steel making plant in Indonesia. Mittal Steel was able to expand into different nations through mergers and acquisitions. At the time of Mittal Steel’s foreign expansion, the steel industry was in the midst of a 25-year slump. The 25-year slump caused many companies to go under distress. Lakshmi Mittal (the CEO of Mittal Steel) saw value in the distressed companies and believed that they could be feasible operations through a move toward greater efficiency and with an injection of capital. On the contrary, Greenfield Investment took a different route by building similar operations from the ground up, which was proven to be more costly. By avoiding the start-up-phase, Mittal Steel was able to avoid delay and take advantage of the benefits that come with a recognized market presence. Mittal Steel brings many benefits to the countries that it enters. For instance, its presence in a foreign market is deemed beneficial as it focuses on acquiring distressed companies and ameliorating them. However, it is important to note that that was not the case for Arcelor, Mittal Steel’s most recent acquisition. The management and politicians were opposed the concept of a foreign firm taking over an organization that was important to the European market. Due to the recent global economic crisis, Mittal Steel may…

    • 2455 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Recently, changes of the demography, the factor price, supply and environmental protection will increase the cost of Chinese exports. On the other hands, the recovery of the U.S economic remains slow, also the continuing escalation of the European debt crisis and the slow recovery of the global economy leading the result of the slow growth of Chinese export trade.…

    • 535 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Since its inception, ArcelorMittal has rapidly grown through a successful consolidation strategy with a number of significant acquisitions. According to ArcelorMittal (2012), the company is the successor to Mittall Steel, a business originally set up in 1976 by Lakshmi N. Mittal, CEO and chairman of the board of directors (paras 1-2).…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Scm in Tatasteel

    • 1682 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The steel manufacturing industry has never been known for being particularly responsive to market needs. In fact, until recently, the industry has been plagued by extremely long lead times, poor customer service and high levels of…

    • 1682 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Steel Industry

    • 4808 Words
    • 20 Pages

    Page No 1. 2. Why Steel? First Glance A) Demand Driver B) Pricing Trends C) Raw Material 3. Industry Structure A) B) C) D) E) 4. Major Players SAIL Tata Steel JSW Comparison 3 4 5 5 5 6 6 6 7 7 7 9 9 9 10 10 11 11 11 12 13…

    • 4808 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mittal Steel

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages

    2. Mittal Steel expanded into different nations through merges and acquisitions, as opposed to Greenfield investment? Why? Mittal Steel entered into foreign expansion at a time in which the steel industry was in the middle of a 25 year slump. This had caused many other steel companies to become distressed and in some cases go under. However, Lakshmi Mittal saw value in the weak state of these firms. He believed with an injection of capital, they could move towards greater efficiency. On the other hand, Greenfield Investment took a different more costly approach. They built operations from the ground up. Mittal Steel was able to avoid this initial start-up phase and quickly take advantage of an already recognizable market presence.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays