Preview

Ap Latin Caesar & Virgil Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
771 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Ap Latin Caesar & Virgil Essay
Krystin Kowalski
Miss Sampson
AP Latin
30 April 2013
Essay
Caesar and Vergil discuss the motivations behind the actions of their characters in battle. Caesar describes what encourages his characters to engage in battle while Virgil describes the reasoning behind Aeneas and the other survivors for retreating from the siege. In the passage from Caesar it is obvious that the soldiers are hesitant to engage in battle according to Caesar in line 1 “atque nostris militibus cunctantibus” (and our soldiers were hesitating). The soldiers were hesitant because they are not use to fighting in the water especially since it is deep in line 1 “propter altitudinem maris” (because the altitude of the sea). I know that it is reasonable for them to be hesitant based on the prior knowledge I have from reading this book because these soldiers end up drowning while they fight because their armor is too heavy compared to the enemy who are used to fighting in water.
Caesar describes how a fellow soldier motivates his comrades to engage in battle by challenging their loyalty to the legion in line 3 “nisi vultus aquilam hostibus prodere” (unless you wish to give up the eagle to the enemy). This quote is what initiates the motivation because their values as a Roman is loyalty to each other, their people and government so the last thing they would want is to betray their legion by allowing the enemy to capture the eagle, which symbolizes their legion and superiority. This soldier continues his speech by encouraging patriotism from his comrades in lines 3-4 “ego certe meum rei publicae atque imperatori officium praestitero” (I certainly will perform duty to the republic and the commander). This quote is the message to the rest of the soldiers that they must fulfill their duty as Roman soldiers and he makes it even more powerful by leaping off the ship and charging into the deep waters toward the enemy in line 4 “se ex navi proiecit atque in hostes” (he himself leaped from the ship

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare’s interpretation of Julius Caesar’s assassination titled, Julius Caesar, a man named Cassius is attempting to get the help and alliance of a fellow Roman named Brutus in the conspiracy of assassinating the Roman leader. He accomplishes this in constructed and detailed monologues to persuade Brutus to join the conspiracy. In each of Cassius’ monologues, Cassius strategically uses appeals and rhetorical devices to ultimately give a successful and persuasive speech to his audience, Brutus.…

    • 895 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    anyone to find justification in the assassination of their emperor. Now, in Antony’s speech he…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    6. To which event in act 4 of The Tragedy of Julius Caesar does this statement refer?…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Veni Vidi Analysis

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Veni, Vidi, Vici is persuasive because it exploits the opponent's weaknesses by the use of artful rhetoric to sway the audience and the use of themes and motifs from the play. The title “Veni, Vidi, Vici” shows a clever use of irony since the quote is usually associated with Caesar, but in our video we support the conspirators. The trailer immediately starts off by branding Rome in 44 BCE as, “A time where emotion took over reason” (1) and shows a scene of Caesar refusing the crown. Emotion vs. reason is a theme from the play because many character’s lose the sophistication of their occupations by letting their feelings of fear and pride stand in there way. By establishing Rome to be in a dire condition, I use an ethos appeal to make Brutus…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Final Exam

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages

    b. Caesar believes he is surrounded by friends and says to Cinna, Metellus, and Trebonius, “Good friends, go in and taste some wine with me/ and we (like friends) will straight away go together.”…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Through the tragic play, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, inside shows multiple evidences of hidden examples of the use of imagery, tone and rhetorical devices. A small example of literature tools could be found inside of this short example from the play, it is enough to express all elements of literature to be found. Brutus discusses the impending future of Rome, if placed upon Julius Caesar’s hands, and attempts to be convincing of others to slay Julius with his rise of power, before he takes the crown, as Julius Caesar follows by his heart more than his brain, he deems Julius Caesar not worthy of taking control over Rome. The tone, imagery, and rhetorical devices used by Shakespeare inside of this small excerpt is supposed to be translated as to further the development of the plot, which all results back to how most of The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, pertains foreshadowing to a lot of chaos as a theme..…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Republican period of Roman history began in 509 BCE after the last Etruscan kings was dropped. The Republic was controlled by the Senate, which was an assembly by dominated upper-class families. This dominance by the aristocracy led to tensions between the social classes, especially among the lower classes who fought for equality in both the economy and the government. Despite these inner struggles, Rome's military power strengthened throughout the 5th and 4th centuries BCE and by 270 BCE they commanded the entire peninsula. 264 BCE brought the beginning of the three Punic Wars fought against Carthage over control of the western Mediterranean. These resulted in victories for Rome which granted them access to the wealth of Greece, Egypt,…

    • 803 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both excerpts illustrate the Gallic siege of the Roman camp, but from two different perspectives: the first from the perspective of the Romans, and the second from the perspective of the Gauls. While Caesar portrays the Romans as hardworking and well prepared for the siege, he portrays the Gauls as ignorant and savage.…

    • 365 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rhetorical devices enhance a speaker’s argument by making the reader or listener question and think about the topic more thoroughly. In Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, Mark Antony’s funeral speech for Caesar persuaded the audience more effectively than Brutus’ speech because of his use of rhetorical devices such as logos, aposiopesis, anaphora.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    devices in order to persuade Brutus, a senator and friend of Caesar, that Caesar is…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare wrote many things. One of his greatest was his play Julius Caesar. The most known part about Caesar is how he dies, stabbed in the back by his best friend. Yet the night he was killed Calphurnia, Caesar’s wife, had warned Caesar not to go. But, Decius, a member of a group of conspirators, tries to persuade Caesar to go to the Senate where they plan to kill him. They both use rhetorical devices to try and sway Caesar their way, but Decius’s wins him over.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most pivotal moments in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar was when Decius, a conspirator against Caesar, convinced Caesar to leave his house by reinterpreting Calpurnia’s horrific dream. Originally, Caesar planned to stay home because of his wife’s plea. However, Decius arrived and successfully convinced Caesar to depart to the Senate. Shakespeare uses different appeals, details, strategies, and understandings of Caesar to make Decius’ argument more persuasive than Calpurnia’s in convincing Caesar whether or not to go to the Senate.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Shakespeare’s The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Mark Antony proves himself to be the most effective manipulator. This feat was the product of many factors that Antony both took into account, and employed to a greater effect than his counterparts. Using the illustrative Rhetorical Triangle of Aristotle, Antony was able to convey the three main ingredients of good rhetoric to convince the Roman mob to turn upon the conspirators, mere moments after being told by Brutus that they had acted with “honor”. Using Logos, Antony’s logical argument that Caesar was not ambitious made the mob begin to doubt their current suppositions that Caesar deserved death for his ambition. With the emotive appeals of…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Julius Caesar Biography

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages

    On his way back he was “captured and ransomed by Mediterranean pirates. After his release, Caesar fulfills his promise to crucify the pirates” (“Julius”). Caesar’s ability to gain justice for himself, in defeating the Cilician pirates, is the reason that he led a “successful attack against Mithradates of Pontus” without being told to do so (Knight). These new victories were just the start of his military operations. When he “gained his first elected office as military tribune” his ego and confidence became inflated and helped him in fighting against the Roman…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    of the play.) What does Horatio suggest by his discussion of Julius Caesar's death (1.1.112 - 125)?…

    • 2070 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays