Preview

Answers to Mini-Case Questions

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1823 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Answers to Mini-Case Questions
( Answers to Mini-Case Questions

BioCom Inc.
This mini-case provides a review of the methodology and rationale associated with the various capital budgeting evaluation methods such as payback period, discounted payback period, NPV, IRR, MIRR, and PI.

1. Compute the payback period for each project.

|Time of Cash Flow |Nano Test Tubes |Microsurgery Kit |
|Investment |−$11,000.00 |−$11,000.00 |
|Year 1 | 2,000.00 | 4,000.00 |
|Year 2 | 3,000.00 | 4,000.00 |
|Year 3 | 4,000.00 | 4,000.00 |
|Year 4 | 5,000.00 | 4,000.00 |
|Year 5 | 7,000.00 | 4,000.00 |

Payback for Nano: cash flows for the first three years total $9,000. (11,000 − 9,000)/4,000 ’ .5, so payback for Nano is 3.5 years. For Microsurgery: cash flows for the first two years total $8,000. (11,000 − 8,000)/4,000 ’ 0.75, so payback for Microsurgery is 2.75 years. a. Explain the rationale behind the payback method.

The payback simply computes the break-even point for a project in terms of time rather than units or dollars. It is the amount of time required for a project to recover the initial investment.

b. State and explain the decision rule for the payback method.

The payback method implies that the sooner a project recovers the initial investment, the better. The choice of an acceptable payback period is arbitrary.

c. Explain how the payback method would be used to rank mutually exclusive projects.

For acceptable mutually exclusive projects, the one with the shortest payback period would be

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Atlas Metal Company

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Atlas Metal Company use payback period and ROI for evaluating projects. Both of these methods have some drawbacks which lead to manager to give wrong decision. Firstly, the firm use payback period by simply calculating the average time when project’s cash flow exceeds the initial investment cost. This method ignores the cash flow after the payback period. In other words, there may be some negative cash flow after payback period which may incur extra costs to company. Moreover, it also ignores the time value of money which causes a miscalculation of expected future cash flows. Secondly, increasing the ROI and deciding projects according to only ROI might harm company in the long-run. If a company always accepts higher ROI projects, company’s average return will also increase which also lead higher risk. Furthermore, there is a time difference between incurring the initial cost for project and later future cash flow. Therefore, this is difficult to evaluate the project with its cost and return in the same time. Also,…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Within this paper, an overview of the general capital budgeting process and how it is implemented within organizations is defined and reported. Key terms related to capital budgeting are also defined. Risk analysis based on the Net Present Value (NPV) is performed on the salvage values before and after sales tax values along with the different sale ranges.…

    • 1640 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Clark Paints

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Payback is calculated by dividing the initial investment by the annual cash inflow. The payback period is when the cumulative net cash inflows begin to exceed the cumulative net cash outflows. If an investment involves uneven cash flows, the computation requires scheduling cash inflows and outflows. Hence payback period is the duration in which initial investments are recovered. Here the payback period is very low and its 3.7 years which is good for the project.…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    the regular payback method is deficient in that it does not take account of cash flows beyond the payback period. The discounted payback method corrects this fault. FALSE…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Capital budgeting is the processes most organizations use to permit authorize capital spending on long-term projects and other projects requiring significant investment of capital. Typically capital budgeting analysis compares cash inflows and cash outflows instead of net income calculated using the accrual basis. Capital projects are typically evaluated using quantitative analysis and qualitative information. There are two capital budget evaluation processes that take into consideration the time value of money Net Present Value (NPV) and the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) (Edmonds, 2007).…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Capital Budgeting is the process in which a business determines whether projects such as building, new plants or investing in a long-term venture are worth pursuing. Sometimes, a prospective project 's lifetime cash inflows and outflows are assessed in order to determine whether the returns generated meet a sufficient target benchmark (“Capital Budgeting” 2014). The most popular methods of capital budgeting is: net present value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR), discounted cash flow (DCF) and payback period. The term "present value" in NPV refers to the fact that cash flows earned in the future are not worth as much as cash flows today. (Gad, S” nd). The payback period is done by calculating the total cost of the project and divide it by how much cash inflow you expect to receive each year; this will give you the total number of years or the payback period (Gad, S nd). The internal rate of return (IRR) is a discounted rate that is commonly used to determine how much of a return an investor can expect to realize from a particular project. The internal rate of return is the discount rate that occurs when a project is break even, or when the NPV equals 0. Here, the decision rule is simple: choose the project where the IRR is higher than the cost of financing (Gad, S nd).…

    • 330 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Acct 571

    • 316 Words
    • 1 Page

    Within this case study the writer will be analyzing and interpreting answers for the Capital Budgeting Case Study. The information obtained was provided in the Week 6 material of the Quantitative Reasoning for Business course. Throughout the paper the writer will cover the rationale behind the Net Present Value (NPV) and the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) results. The information obtained will show the relationship between the two and provide an explanation behind the acquisition recommendation within the Excel spreadsheet.…

    • 316 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    FINC2011 Assessment

    • 2131 Words
    • 9 Pages

    When making capital budgeting decisions, there are various techniques that can be utilised. Ross et al. (2008) describes that the predominant capital budgeting methods used as being the Net Present value (NPV) method, the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) method, the Payback method, and the Accounting Rate of Return (ARR) method. Conversely, Brealey, Myers and Allen (2011) proposes that the NPV and IRR methods are considered prestige compared to the ARR and the Payback Methods, as they take into account the time value of money. Thus, the following project evaluation will focus on using the NPV and IRR methods.…

    • 2131 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    SW Airline

    • 550 Words
    • 1 Page

    In the two situations, the payback periods is 5.71 years and 2.13 years, respectively. The payback…

    • 550 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Caledonia Project

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The initial investment is $100,000. It is assumed that Caledonia has no recovery until the fourth year. In the fifth year $200,000 is received. To…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Investment Detective

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages

    3. What rank should we assign to each project? Why do payback and NPV not agree completely? Which criterion is best?…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    quiz

    • 755 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Why is it believed that Japanese companies prefer the payback period over the discounted cash flow methods for evaluating capital investment alternatives?…

    • 755 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Energy Gel Case Study

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages

    We also see here that they chose to use the payback period and ROIC in order to evaluate the project. A more accurate tool to use for this evaluation would have been either NPV or IRR.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Victoria Chemicals

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages

    (2) Payback period evaluates how long the project is going to take to reach break-even point.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Goodweek Tires Case Study

    • 2387 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Capital budgeting is the process of identification of opportunities, estimation of cash flow to be generated by the project, evaluating and selecting from among the alternative courses of actions and implementing the investment project with proper follow-up. Hence, Managers must carefully select those projects which promise the greatest future return. How well managers make these capital budgeting decisions is a critical factor in the long run profitability of the company. The case is about the investment decision for producing SuperTread, a new tire of Goodweek Tires, Inc. The report focuses on the Net Present Value (NPV), Payback period, Discounted payback period, Average Accounting Return (AAR), Internal Rate of Return (IRR), Profitability Index (PI) of this project.…

    • 2387 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics