Preview

Animal Testing Controversy

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1872 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Animal Testing Controversy
Animal Testing Controversy When shopping at a store, no one ever thinks when he or she buys makeup, cleaning products, deodorant or lotion, that it has potentially hurt an innocent animal. In fact, millions of animals die every year due to a chemical drug. Those animals harmed never got a chance to live a normal, animal life; instead, they were put into cages and locked up for years at a time. While animal testing can be used to ensure the safety of certain drugs for humans, potentially killing or harming the animal being tested deems this practice wrong because it is immoral to kill or injure an innocent animal. An animal being subjected to testing is not fair; that animal did nothing wrong to deserve to be treated as an experiment. Like humans, animals are creatures living and breathing on this world too. How is it acceptable that creatures almost equal to us humans are treated like scum? Stated in the article “Controversy of Animal Testing” by Ian Murnaghan, “One key argument against animal testing involves the inability of animals to consent to the tests. Humans... can make an informed decision to consent while animals have tests forced upon them, with no choice.” As Murnaghan said, animals do not have the choice to decide whether they’ll be tested on or not, for they are obviously unable to speak. However, given the opportunity for an animal to have a voice, the likelihood that they’d reject the proposal of a test is highly likely. During an animal test, it may involve pain, suffering and discomfort. Although researchers try their best to minimize the pain, they aren 't able to completely prevent any from happening. For the reason that an innocent animal is suffering against their free will, animal testing should be eliminated for the testing of drugs and other substances. All beings respond differently to various kinds of drugs and chemicals applied on them for testing. Since they react in so many different ways, it is very hard to


Cited: "Cruelty to Animals in Laboratories." Peta.org. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 Oct. 2012. . Feder, Barnaby J. "Saving the Animals: New Ways to Test Products." The New York Times. The New York Times, 12 Sept. 2007. Web. 13 Oct. 2012. . Murnaghan, Ian. "Controversy of Animal Testing." Controversy of Animal Testing. N.p., 14 Dec. 2010. Web. 7 Oct. 2012. . Murnaghan, Ian. "Using Animals for Testing: Pros Versus Cons." Using Animals for Testing: Pros Versus Cons. N.p., 1 July 2011. Web. 7 Oct. 2012. . Suzy Woodell October 15, 2012
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal Testing: Good Or Evil?
    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Animal Testing: Good Or Evil?

    Animal testing, also known as animal experimentation, or in vivo testing, often uses non-human animals in experiments to test the safety of products and has been a topic of heated debate for decades. Although some research uses animals only for natural behaviors observation, F. Barbara Orlans claimed in her book, In the Name of Science: Issues in Responsible Animal Experimentation, that more than sixty percent of all animals used in animal testing suffer from experiment procedure or even get killed in biomedical research and product-safety testing. On the one hand, successful animal testing can lead to medical cures and treatments for human beings, on the other hand, opponents are doubting the reliability of animal…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Animal Testing Satire
    • 1635 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Animal Testing Satire

    Many animals are subject to inhumane conditions and procedures in the “name of science”. Animals are used for testing in everything from that trendy matte red lipstick from Covergirl Cosmetics to medical lab testing used to correctly identify the antibody signaling an immune response in lab rats. Animal testing has a vast range of uses with little to no rules identifying the treatment the animal subject to testing is subjected to. Many different brands, especially cosmetic brands, have cruelty-free stickers on their products to let the customer know the product was produced without harm to animals. The United States of America has not limited the use of animal testing yet, however, the European Union has limited animal testing and banned the use of testing on animals on cosmetics and cosmetic ingredients (European…

    • 1635 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Unethical Animal Testing
    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Unethical Animal Testing

    The primary use of in-vitro tests is to detect specific toxic properties of drugs and/or chemicals. The studies normally take place in labware such as test tubes, flasks, petri dishes and microtiter plates. Studies use components of organisms that have been isolated to get a more detailed and convenient analysis that can be done with whole organisms. Results obtained from in-vitro tests may not be 100%…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Benefits
    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Animal Testing Benefits

    Do you ever wonder how beauty products and medical treatment are get the seal of approval for human use? Today many beauty and health manufactures validate their product through animal testing. These poor and defenseless creatures are being held in steel cold cages waiting to be performed on to advance human life. Animal testing should be terminated because the animals live in fear and pain, violates their rights and other methods are available to accurate data for products and…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Animal Testing: the Animal Rights Debate. New York: the Rosen Publishing
    • 1992 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Animal Testing: the Animal Rights Debate. New York: the Rosen Publishing

    Summary/Description: This book discusses the pros and cons of animal testing. It gives a brief history of the animal right movement, and It also address the legal and ethical issues involved around this cruel testing. The Animal Act was rejected by Congress in the United States and animal testing became a part of scientific and medical life.…

    • 1992 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Flaws
    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Animal Testing Flaws

    Animal testing has always been a dispute between people; some people think it’s morally wrong and some people think it helps with medical and scientific breakthroughs. Drugs that people use or cosmetics that are used could have been tested through animals before being stocked on shelves. About 800 animals are tested on before a drug is passed to clinical trials (“Is animal”). Many animals get tested on, but many like mice, rabbits, hamsters, monkeys, dogs, cats, pigs, and some other animals get tested on. Animals can be used to find new advances in medical treatment and check safety for products, but these animals that get tested on can go through pain and death. Animal testing is wrong and should be stopped because…

    • 749 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Persuasive Essay Against Animal Testing
    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Persuasive Essay Against Animal Testing

    Animal testing has been a topic of debate for many generations. It is difficult to imagine a common house hold pet subjected to extreme procedures of the mildest and painless form to the harshest form imaginable. I am talking about your average mouse, rabbit, cat or dog. At the same time, consumers want to be assured they are using the safest products available, and people want science to find cures for life-threatening diseases. Lately, science has tried to prove out theories and hypnosis through computer algorithms but we still have to rely on physical subjects like the animals referenced. There is no public argument that says we should not test products before entering the market, the debate is the method by which these products should be tested. Animal testing is necessary for biomedical research, but should be eradicated for vanity reasons in terms of cosmetics.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Arguments Against Animal Testing
    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Arguments Against Animal Testing

    (2008) How much does animal testing tell us? Time. Retrieved on Wednesday 18 January, 2011 from http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1815241,00.html…

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing
    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing

    According to Ian Murnaghan, M.Sc, on his piece, “The Pros and Cons of Animal Testing,” the majority of the scientific society is strongly for animal testing. They see that humans are superior to animal life (Murnaghan). This belief justifies the use of animals in testing. The unfortunate truth, however, is that a lot of these creatures go…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Cruelty-It's Time To Stop Animal Testing
    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Cruelty-It's Time To Stop Animal Testing

    Many animals are suffering from the experiments they go through, such being the test dummies for cosmetics like for makeup, shampoo, etc. Animals should not be suffering because of makeup. One believes makeup is not a necessity to humans. In America, a well know organization is working on ending animal testing. The Humane Society of the United States and Humane Society International “are committed to ending animal testing-forever. Through our Be Cruelty-Free campaign, we are working in the U.S. and around the globe to create a world where animals no longer have to suffer to produce lipstick and shampoo” (The Humane Society, 2017). This big organization understands that animals are suffering for non-essential things that humans use, but don’t have to use. They only use it because they want to. Animals are being tested for things that we don’t need, but one does understand that people need shampoo when taking a shower. Therefore, animals should test our products before people buy them…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    animal test should not be band
    • 1094 Words
    • 4 Pages

    animal test should not be band

    However, beside the benefits of it there are also some disadvantages (Stubblefield, 2009; Murnaghan, 2010c). Costs of housing animals, the reproducibility in human and the necessity of the product are aspects which they often need to consider more before using laboratory animals. Therefore alternative tests are needed to reduce the use of animals. In vitro techniques are considered as important alternatives but they lack the complexity of the human body (Murnaghan, 2010a). The use of lower organisms, such as bacteria, fungi and insects, can complement these shortcomings because they can produce substances which animals also can create (Murnaghan, 2010a). Other possibilities are magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET) scans, computerized axial tomography (CAT) scans and telemetry. These are methods to follow the physiological processes in animals without treating them, so these are also good alternatives that can be used. Synthetic membranes, statistics and computer models can also avoid the use of animals. Synthetic membranes can be used to determine the effect of chemicals and treatments on skin tissue. Statistical procedures can allow researchers to use comprehensive data sets to better gauge how a disease can spread. Using data that was previously obtained from animal…

    • 1094 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Animal Testing Is Necessary
    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Animal Testing Is Necessary

    In our society we place great importance on safety, on a daily basis we take precautions to protect ourselves from things that can harm us. We have to be sure that everything we put in our bodies, put on our bodies and just about everything that we come in contact with is as safe as possible for us. The use of animal testing has helped aid society in being sure that products are safe for humans to use; whether that be food products, cosmetics, household cleaners, or even pharmaceuticals. But in our efforts to shield ourselves and our families from harm, who or what has been hurt in the process. Animal testing is an important component in the development of products intended for human use; however, animal testing subjects innocent animals to…

    • 1786 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Morality Of Animal Testing
    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Morality Of Animal Testing

    Animal testing is undoubtedly one of the most controversial issues in modern society. This practice began in the 19th century; animals were used to test dosing of certain drugs and chemicals. In the 1920’s, animals were also being used to test pesticides and food additives (Fano, 11). Today, animal testing is used to study everything from cosmetics to cancer. With such a wide range of opinions on animal rights and human priority, it is no wonder that this topic is so controversial. There are people who have an extreme view on the issue and are either completely pro or completely con. In my opinion, the issue of animal testing is far too complex for one simple answer; its morality lies somewhere in between the two poles. Animal testing is acceptable if it results in saving people’s lives. It is not acceptable, however, if it results in personal or cosmetic products that are far from vital to the human race.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Cruelty on Animal Testing
    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Cruelty on Animal Testing

    “Animal testing is wrong and it is cruelty to animals. Each year about five million dogs, cats, rabbits, monkeys, and other animals die in lethal dose tests performed in many states of the United States” (mega essays). Every year, an animal dies in an experiment in the United States. Can you imagine how many of these poor creatures die every day all around the world? Scientists and researchers cruelly experiment on the innocent lives of non-human animals. Animal experimentation is not only cruel, horrific, and heartbreaking it is also useless. “Ninety-four percent of animal testing is done to determine the safety of cosmetics and household products. That only leaves six percent for medical research. The saving of one life cannot be justified by the killing of another” (Stop Animal testing). During the lethal dose tests the experimental are forced into the animal’s throats, or pumped into their stomachs by a tube. This causes death by stomach rupture or from chemical dosage. Another way that animals are experimented is by injecting under their skin, often applied to the eyes, and inhaled through a gas mask.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing: Necessary Or Harmful?
    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Animal Testing: Necessary Or Harmful?

    Legal drugs, which made their way to public animals, kill approximately one hundred thousand people per year, and because more illegal drugs combined and cost the general public over one hundred thirty-six billion dollars in health care expenses (Greek). This amount of money could be saved if animal testing would come to a standstill. “The care and upkeep of primates other than chimpanzees are twenty to twenty-five dollars per day” (Conlee). The money would be more useful if it was not put towards animal testing where animal testing does not always work and is inconclusive. “The only U.S. law that governs the use of animals in laboratories – the Animal Welfare Act – allows animals to be burned, shocked, poisoned, isolated, starved, forcibly restrained, addicted to drugs, and brain-damaged (Berlatsky). This would be awful to do to a human, in fact, it is illegal. Then why should this be legal to do to animals when animals feel the same as a human. Undergoing animal testing and not doing anything about it is shameful. People know what happens to animals while this testing accrues but it needs to come to a standstill. The United States already puts too much money into this testing just for animals to be tortured. Because rats and mice are not protected by the law, experimenters do not have to provide them with pain relief (Berlatsky). The amount of money put into this animal testing for the results to not be what they wanted is shocking. The animal testing is cruel to animals and needs to be put under animal…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics