Preview

Animal Experimentation: The Bad Side Effects Of Animal Testing On Animals

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
963 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Animal Experimentation: The Bad Side Effects Of Animal Testing On Animals
Animal experimentation is not a thing to joke about, people are using animals against their will to test products on them.This is relevant in life because people will joke around about how the animals are fine but there are many side effects if the makeup is not right or correct. For example, Covergirl the makeup company has tested on animals since 2012. Covergirl tests on adorable kittens for the face makeups like lipstick, mascara, eyeliner, etc. The results of testing makeup products can vary. Animal experimentation does bad things to animals and they should have their own rights because experimentation creates inequality among animals, harmful side effects on animals and lastly, there are alternate populations to test.
People use animal
…show more content…
According to the article, Animal Experimentation states, “150 brain-damaged baboons at the University of Pennsylvania's Head Injury Clinic in 1983. The Animal Liberation Front, a group that uses threats, sabotage, and other illegal means to draw attention to animal cruelty, claimed responsibility for a raid at the clinic and worked with PETA to publicize the situation” (Driscoll S Finley Paragraph 18). This evidence supports my claim because it shows that all kinds of animals can get hurt by even the littlest thing that is tested on them. This is important because it shows by just testing one product is show that it caused them to get hurt/injured. The main reason why this is so bad for the animals is that it shows why and how when animals are tested on more that kills than and eventually, they will become extinct. The connection between why it hurts animals and why they should not feel this way shows that people are hurting the animals by testing on them so they have no rights whatsoever. Even though they are hurting animals for experimentation there are many side effects of the main disease or issue the experiment has caused. For example, in the article Animal Experimentation they states, “In research and testing, animals are subjected to experiments that can include everything from testing new products to infecting with diseases, poisonous for toxicity tests, burning skin, …show more content…
Some people believe that humans shouldn’t be tested on because they could feel sad because they believe that they just killed or injured someone that is their own kind. According to the article, Animal Experimentation it states “ More and more scientists are taking a hard look at the relevance of animal experiments for human diseases and improving our lives. The evidence is showing that we can actually get much better answers about human health and develop much more effective therapies if we use human-based tests instead”(Driscoll S Finley Paragraph 24). This shows how bad the humans should feel for the animals and should want to use them

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Animal abuse is defined as the human infliction of suffering or harm upon any nonhuman animal. Why does animal abuse not apply to animal testing? Animal testing has been around for about 40 years, ever since the 1920’s; it had a breakthrough and became well known. The number of animals being used for testing each year continues to increase. Animals’ that are being used for testing is wrong because it is inhumane.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal testing involves the inability to consent. It involves pain, suffering, and discomfort under certain situations. Researchers aren’t fully able to block out the pain, certain tests they will use anaesthetic. The abuse animals during this test was publicised in the 1990’s to create a public frenzy and anger towards animal testing. This increased attention led to the ban of animal testing for cosmetics in…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Satire On Animal Testing

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Animals do not have a say once they are taken away from their current living space, and then killed or have to suffer through what the researchers put them through. These innocents now are being punished, abused, and now have more risks and a shortened life span. Realistically, in my opinion, in order to experiment on animals you really don’t have a heart. People who love animals, could never and would never experiment on them because the things that people do to them we really don’t deserve the satisfaction of animals. “Animals used in experiments are commonly subjected to force feeding, forced inhalation, food and water deprivation, prolonged periods of physical restraint, the infliction of burns and other wounds to study the healing process, the infliction of pain to study its effects and remedies, and "killing by carbon dioxide asphyxiation, neck-breaking, decapitation, or other means." This piece of textual evidence is explaining how animals are not treated properly while being used in experimentation. Animals are forced to do things unwanted to, and also are deprived of certain things. Consider the people who have to do this for a living- they are finding cures for us humans, and also testing products such as cosmetics and shampoos and making sure that we can use them. You may think that animal testing is beneficial, but it's not, it's putting animals life in danger. Rabbits are used to test cosmetics and shampoos, during this process rabbits are powerless and have their eyelids opened by clips this can occur for days. Moving forward, as you can see many animals are harmed during the process and it is very heartbreaking to hear about the many animals that are hurt or killed to find cures for us. If you anyone who loves animals, if animal experimentation is okay, they would say it was abusive, because you taking the life of an innocent animal and putting it in…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Testing Benefits

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Not only humans, but animals also benefit from the use of animal testing. In fact, if animals aren’t used for medical research certain vaccines for rabies, hepatitis and other diseases wouldn’t be curable (Trull). However, many people argue that the human anatomy differs from that of animals. Nonetheless, animals and humans still share common features. For example, monkeys, just like humans, share the same fundamental use of hormones to counteract infections, which has helped scientist improve research (Trull). For the people who doubt animal testing should go to hospitals and look at patients who have survived from illnesses and diseases, because if it had not been for animals lives wouldn’t be…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The article Animal Testing is Bad states, “Animals are being with feelings, thoughts, and families”(Elena1). They have a right to live peacefully and are not just subjects that should be tested on. Even though animals are a bit different from human, people cant kill them for their own sake. Scientists kill millions of animals in order to test if a product is safe for humans. It is not right and it is also not even accurate.…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is common knowledge that many animals are used in medical and scientific research. These innocent animals are often obliged to undergo countless of cruel processes and endure great suffering as a result. Despite all the disputes and discussions regarding whether or not animal testing is actually necessary, they wouldn't change the fact that it is, in fact, an extremely cruel thing to do.…

    • 434 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How would you feel getting chemicals dropped into your eyes and on your skin, being confined into a small cell waiting to be tortured? Now why is it fair to do this to animals? There are so many reasons why animals should not be used for scientific research. Animal testing is unethical, and completely immoral. Not to mention it is unnecessary and there are many newly developed options that avoid animal cruelty. Additionally, animal testing has been proven to be ineffective and inaccurate.…

    • 620 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Benefits Of Animal Testing

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In animal testing, countless animals are experimented on and then killed after their use is up. Some are injured and will still live the remainder of their life in captivity. The doctors will not do anything to help the animals that are in pain that happen to be the reason because of them. It is the aspect of animals testing that many view as a major negative against the practice, as it seems that the animal died in vain because no direct benefit to humans occurred. Even though animals and humans have many things in common like how we both have the same organ system, there are also many things that are different between animals and humans. Many animals cannot handle or take the same medication as humans, most the surgeries that are operated on animals are just too strong for an animal to take so they end up dying or sick for the rest of their lives. (Animal Testing…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Research shows that 26 million animals have been used for testing of all different kinds. 26 million animals have been put through wringer for the sake of a human. 26 million animals have had no say, defense, or chance to save themselves. Animals are used as human experiments to see if a certain product can work or not. Animal testing is wrong on many different levels. If humans are not willing to use, test and experiment on themselves, why should one be allowed to test on an animal who has no say in what happens.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    find treatment for anything from cancer to pain. If the results have a possibility to save so many…

    • 975 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animals testing is unethical because the pain and suffering that they are subjected to is not worth any possible benefits to humans. Scientists inject animals with irritating chemicals, genetically manipulate them to cause rare and painful genetic diseases, give them cancer and other diseases, and cause other injuries in the name of science. These animals are not given painkillers and are forced to endure prolonged agony before eventually dying…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the world of animal cruelty, there are plenty of controversial issues surrounding this topic. Out of all of them, animal testing would be the most controversial topic in dealing with animal cruelty. Scientists have been doing animal testing for many years, using animals as their guinea pigs. There is a controversy on whether animal testing is right or wrong. On one side, the article “Animal Testing and Its Gift to Humans” by Frankie Trull talks about, as said in the title, how animal testing is helpful in finding cures for human diseases and that we should continue in doing so. The article states “This extraordinary development wouldn’t have been possible without animal research” (Trull 2). This shows how animal testing has helped out in finding cures for many illnesses in humans. Without the help of animals, we wouldn’t have the cures we have today. On the other hand, some people believe that animal testing is wrong and shouldn’t be done. According to the article “Killing Animals and Humans,” it states “...many differences – both obvious and very subtle – between humans and other species make animal experiments a waste of time, effort, money and lives – both human and animal.” (Animal Aid 6). Why test on animals…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    "More than 100 million animals are poisoned, burned, crippled, and abused in other ways in U.S. labs each year."(#1video) Animal testing became a common method between 200-300 BC, these tests were often led by important male figures such as Aristotle. In 1242 Ibn al- Nafis used animals to test blood circulation, his theory of human blood circulation was later proven by William Henry many years later. In the 1660's another scientist, Robert Boyle, theorized that living beings needed air to live, he proved his theory by testing on animals. In the 1800's people started standing against animal testing. People who stood against the cruelty brought on to animals led Great Britain to pass the Cruelty to Animals Act in 1876. In the 1900's the exact…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Poor defenseless animals fight for their lives every day to test out products they have no use for. These poor sweet creatures have been taken away their right to live to be caged and mistreated and they can’t do anything but sit there and take it. Day to day, more and more animals are dying at the cruel hands of these scientists. Animal Testing is an act of animal cruelty, because it is inhumane, there are other methods that can be used to avoid harming…

    • 946 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It’s not right for powerless animals to live their life in a laboratory, knowing nothing but a life of pain and agony that they’ve grown accustomed to. The unethical tests do not give us accurate outcomes and billions of dollars are being wasted. Animal testing should be an outdated practice by now since we have the technology to create more accurate, effective alternatives. The only solution is to put an end to animal research testing for good and have it banned. Justice needs to be served for all the animals victim to this…

    • 2066 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays