Preview

Andrew Jackson's Indian Removal Policy: Cruelty Or A Fair Policy

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
377 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Andrew Jackson's Indian Removal Policy: Cruelty Or A Fair Policy
There are many opinions on Andrew Jackson’s Indian Removal Policy was an act of cruelty or a fair policy, but the policy did not benefit Native Americans.

The Indian Removal Act went against the indian’s rights, and the indians did not want to move off their land. The Indians were forced off their land because of the Indian Removal Act. The Cherokee tried to go to court to fight the Indian Removal Act, explaining that the act was against their rights. The Cherokee did lose, and eventually were forced to follow the Indian Removal Act. The Native Americans that were moved also had rights to original land they lived on. For example, the Cherokee had a written constitution that explained that the Cherokee had full control of the land. That did
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Andrew Jackson Spoils System Research Paper
    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Andrew Jackson Spoils System Research Paper

    Should Andrew Jackson stay or be removed from the twenty dollar bill? To qualify to be on the American twenty dollar bill,you have to be dead. Andrew Jackson was the 7th president of the United States and is currently on the twenty dollar bill. Jackson was responsible for things such as the Indian Removal Act and the Spoils System. Andrew Jackson should be removed from the U.S twenty dollar bill because he passed the Indian Removal Act,caused the panic of 1837, and created the Spoils System.…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Indian Removal Act Dbq Analysis
    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Indian Removal Act Dbq Analysis

    John L. O’Sullivan had said, “‘... our manifest destiny to overspread the continent allotted by Providence for the free development of our yearly multiplying millions.’” (www.britanica.com) During Andrew Jackson’s term, America had set its sights on the untamed West - which, inconveniently, happened to be the Indians’ territory. President Jackson decided to create a controversial treaty that would allow America to exchange the Indians’ land for a large piece of land in the Louisiana Territory. It was created on May 28, 1830 and sparked much criticism and support throughout the nation. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was justified because the Indians were enemies of America, they were given good land, and they were offered the government’s protection.…

    • 809 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Andrew Jackson's Indian Policy
    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Andrew Jackson's Indian Policy

    Known as having adopted an Indian child as his son, Andrew Jackson was quite fond of the Indian race; however, with pressure to expand westward, he needed to transfer the Indians farther west and soon became their worst enemy. Andrew Jackson’s Indian Policy was to move the Indians westward as peacefully as possible, for the tribes that stayed in the East Coast were annihilated. Also, moving them West will help them live longer, and there is a fair exchange for the tribes moving. Another important component is the gain of Western lands and the addition of American power; this will add on to America’s size and increase America’s authority.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Andrew Jackson Villain Research Paper
    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Andrew Jackson Villain Research Paper

    While President Andrew Jackson is often made out to be a villain for his treatment of the Native Americans, he is not to blame for the massive loss of life the tribes experienced. Most of the non-natives in the South, especially Georgia, supported the Indian Removal Act, shaping the South’s political views and putting pressure on Congress, the Senate, and Jackson himself. Eager to take on Native American lands, appetites were large for the Native Americans to be removed.…

    • 299 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Is President Jackson A Champion Of Democracy And Egalitarianism
    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages

    How Is President Jackson A Champion Of Democracy And Egalitarianism

    In the case Worcester vs. Georgia. Cherokee Indians fought for their right to control their land which was roughly ¼ the size of Georgia. “We have a perfect and original right to remain in our lands without interruption or molestation.” (Document B) Georgia fought to have them removed saying that they were uncivilized and couldn’t assimilate into American culture, and that they made a contract with tribe leaders. In the case the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Worcester and the Cherokees. John Marshall said “The Cherokee Indians have an unquestionable right to their territory until title should be extinguished by voluntary cession to the United States” (Document B). Jackson disregarded this ruling and had the Indian Removal Act of 1830 put in place where he forced the Indians west of the Mississippi River along what is now known as “The Trail of…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Cherokee Removal Book Review
    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Cherokee Removal Book Review

    The Cherokee Removal is a brief history with documents by Theda Perdue and Michael Green. In 1838-1839 the US troops expelled the Cherokee Indians from their ancestral homeland in the Southeast and removed them to the Indian Territory in what is now Oklahoma. The removal of the Cherokees was a product of the demand for land during the growth of cotton agriculture in the Southeast, the discovery of gold on the Cherokees land, and the racial prejudice that many white southerners had toward the Indians.…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Indian Removal
    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Dbq Indian Removal

    There were some reasons why the Cherokees moved in the first place. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 justified because the Indians did things that are very uncalled for. They did things like, scalping men, women, and children alive. and They also burned them on stakes. Also the Cherokees agree to move because they signed a treaty that if they sign it they agreed to move. Plus when they move they get to receive five million dollars and they also get a lot of land. So the Cherokees agree to move and get land and five million dollars and the Americans don’t want to die.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Indian Removal Act Justified Essay
    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Indian Removal Act Justified Essay

    In conclusion, the Indian Removal Act of 1830 should not be justified because the Americans broke treaties and cheated the Indians in deals, the Americans gave the Indians bad land, and the Indians were there first. The had a peaceful life, then the Americans came in and messed it…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Jackson Indian Removal Analysis
    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Andrew Jackson Indian Removal Analysis

    In the 1800’s when America was still developing as a new country, there were still many conflicts proceeding throughout that period. Andrew Jackson served as the seventh president and his main concern was the removal of the Cherokee tribe from their own land. As a result, the Cherokee people were divided amongst themselves because of this act President Jackson wanted to enforce. While many Cherokee people ignored Jackson’s instructions and stayed on their land, few did go to what is now Oklahoma. Even before they were told to migrate to federal lands, the society of Cherokee was still divided. The money distributed throughout their original land was not equal. The rich got more while the poor got less; much like today, still.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Major Ridge Argumentative Essay
    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Major Ridge Argumentative Essay

    There were many events that led up to the removal of the Eastern Cherokee in the early-to-mid 19th century. However, it all really begins in 1830. Major Ridge was discussing treaties regarding selling land to the U.S. Government. The Cherokee believed that lived in their own sanctuary, their paradise, and that their ancestors had always lived here. Major Ridge felt if he could die to preserve his people land’s he would gladly do so. The Cherokee picked the wrong side during the American Revolution which caused American soldiers to desecrate Cherokee lands. He did not wish that same tragedy amongst his people. President Jefferson believed that eventually through cultural assimilation the Indian people and Americans would become one and we would…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Compare And Contrast Cherokee And White Settlers
    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Compare And Contrast Cherokee And White Settlers

    In the early 1800s, White settlements were expanding westward. This threatened the Cherokee land which was located in the Southeastern part of the United States. This left the Cherokee with a big decision to make for their entire tribe. Would they relocate West ,or stay for the White settlements to invade where they call home. After all, the Cherokee had owned the land for over 10,000 years. It was not the United States’ land to take. This is why many of the Cherokee Nation felt the need to stay. Others wanted to move because they felt that if they did not, then the United States territory would override the Cherokee customs and they would have to follow United States laws. Clearly the best chance of survival for the Cherokee was to stay in…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    President Andrew Jackson's Reflective Essay: The Trials Of Tears
    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages

    President Andrew Jackson's Reflective Essay: The Trials Of Tears

    The government didn't give them options; basically gave them land Oklahoma and told them to move there. The Cherokee refused to leave which is exactly what I would have done. The Cherokees wanted to continue on with the traditions of their ancestors. They wanted to live on the land of their ancestors,…

    • 302 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Andrew Jackson And The Indian Removal Act
    • 244 Words
    • 1 Page

    Andrew Jackson And The Indian Removal Act

    Andrew Jackson also known as, ‘Old Hickory’ promoted many policies that impacted the young nation. Known for his authoritarian style during his presidency it was no surprise Jackson would be harsh with the Native Americans and treat the Indians with no mercy while doing so. “Like most white frontiersmen. Jackson viewed Indians as barbarians without rights…” (Shi & Tindall 2015 p. 330) this influenced his decision to request congress to approve the Indian Removal Act. By debating this request congress allowed the president to neglect all prior treaties/negotiations to protect the lands of the Native American’s forefathers where they were residing. This would fuel the fire between many Americans because they had divided opinions on this matter,…

    • 244 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Trail Of Tears: Andrew Jackson
    • 241 Words
    • 1 Page

    Trail Of Tears: Andrew Jackson

    President Andrew Jackson was greatly amiss in his measure to force the Indians out of their homes were their ancestors had lived in long ago. Thus because, he used brutal force and harsh conditions before and during the removal of the Indian tribes. “Men paid to move the Cherokee Nation are cruel”(Cherokee). This segment was published on April 4, 1838 along with other various articles, and explains that the Cherokee new that the government would not treat them with respect nor kindness. While disliked by the vast majority of Indians, most of the everyday people actually admired Jackson because they saw him as somewhat of a hero because he gave the perception that the Indians were uncivilized savages, and by removing them he…

    • 241 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Indian Removal Act's Contribution To The Civil War
    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Indian Removal Act's Contribution To The Civil War

    Have you ever made a trade that was fair to you, but unfair to someone else or vice versa. Well, you're not the only one. On May 28, 1830 there was an act signed that stated that the Congress and Government could trade and negotiate for their land in return for the land on the west side of the Mississippi River. John Ross a Cherokee chief, Andrew Jackson the president, and the congress were all involved in the signing of this act. The Congress and the other people involved on the government side wanted the land because they had more access to it and had better quality than the previous land. “The bold effort the president Central Bank had made to control the government… are but premonitions of the fate that await the American people should they be deluded…

    • 821 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More