Preview

Andrew Jackson's Indian Policies Analysis

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1476 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Andrew Jackson's Indian Policies Analysis
Andrew Jackson's Indian Policies: Unbridled Aggression or Pragmatic Solution? "It seems not to be an established fact that they can not live in contact with a civilized community and prosper." Andrew Jackson believed that Indians were savages, incapable of any "civilized" intercommunication between themselves and whites. Through this belief Jackson declared that Indians need not be in contact with white settlers. Throughout Jackson's life he had fought Indians, beginning with his campaign against the Northern Creek Indians of Alabama and Georgia. He led the Tennessee militia to fight Seminoles in Florida in a war known as the "First Seminole War" just seven years before his election into the presidency . Jackson's land policies, which he …show more content…
The Treaty of New Echota, was signed by a faction of prominent Cherokee leaders, but not by the elected tribal leadership. In theory, this removal was supposed to be voluntary, and many American Indians did remain in the East. In practice, however, the Jackson administration put great pressure on tribal leaders to sign removal treaties. This pressure created bitter divisions within American Indian nations, as different tribal leaders advocated different responses to the question of removal. During the Treaty of New Echota U.S. government officials ignored tribal leaders who resisted signing removal treaties and dealt only with those who favored removal. Though the Trail of Tears took place during Van Buren's presidency, through Jackson's numerous removal acts such as the treaty of New Echota he set up the framework for the Trail of Tears. Van Buren's administration only had to enforce the Treaty of New Echota, which resulted in the deaths of an estimated 4,000 Cherokees on the Trail of Tears. Jackson had carried out his plans to relocate the Indians west of the Mississippi, and then some. His land policies were very unfair to Indian tribes, because they were not written for the tribes' advantages, but rather for the taking of their

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Jackson’s presidency also focused on issues of westward expansion. Pursuing paths of “civilization,” Native Americans of the Southeast engaged in extensive agricultural and educational development. But pressure from white settlers and from the state governments proved overwhelming, and Jackson finally supported the forced removal of all southeastern Indians to Oklahoma along the “Trail of Tears.”…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Although Jackson avoided committing himself on the tariff of internal improvements, his favoring of rapid removal was well know and accounted for his popularity in Georgia, Alabama, and Mississippi. The issue involved Indian tribes all over the country, but the ones with the most to lose were the civilized tribes which included the Cherokee, Creek, Choctaw, Chickasaw, and the Seminoles. These people practiced agriculture and animal husbandry and still processed substantial domains in the Deep South states plus in Tennessee, North Carolina, and the Florida Territory (342). The Indian removal bill took high priority in the Jackson’s legislative agenda. Both getting the bill to pass and the latter enforcement of it took Jackson’s full attention. However the Indian removal bill called for another round of treaty-making, intended to secure the complete removal of the Indians to west of the Mississippi (347). The president signed Indian removal into law on May 28, 1830. Jackson wasted no time implementing his favorite measure. While the nations focus was on Georgia and the Cherokees, he sent John Coffee and Secretary of War Eaton to Mississippi to obtain the removal of the Choctaws (352). The efforts the commenced secured the treaty of Dancing Rabbit Creek on September 27, 1830. Some Choctaws in the forests of eastern Mississippi contrived to avoid the government’s attention until 1918,…

    • 2200 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Americans came, we were told that the land is no longer ours. This is due to a law called andrew Jackson's Indian Removal Policy. I do not know who Andrew is, I already do not like him.The Americans have gave us nothing.The Americans had told us that we are going on a trail to a new land, we can have the land their.We did not have time to pack, and we did not have room to bring much.Once we started walking on the trail I could tell it was going to be a long walk, it was just one of these feelings. We walked for miles at a time without stopping for breaks.To be honest diary I do not believe the elders are going to make it, they keep slowing down and stopping. After about en miles I could no longer see the elders, I hope they are fine.We…

    • 263 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In his message, “On Indian Removal”, Andrew Jackson uses the term “savages” to refer to the Native Americans. It is very obvious that the word “savage” is used as a derogatory term towards the native Americans. This contributes to the tone of the message as a whole because Jackson is convincing the Congress that the removal of the Native Americans is positive for white men and woman. In “Samuel’s Memory”, Michael Rutledge uses the term “whites” to refer to the white soldiers that were sent to remove the tribes from their land.…

    • 159 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Known as having adopted an Indian child as his son, Andrew Jackson was quite fond of the Indian race; however, with pressure to expand westward, he needed to transfer the Indians farther west and soon became their worst enemy. Andrew Jackson’s Indian Policy was to move the Indians westward as peacefully as possible, for the tribes that stayed in the East Coast were annihilated. Also, moving them West will help them live longer, and there is a fair exchange for the tribes moving. Another important component is the gain of Western lands and the addition of American power; this will add on to America’s size and increase America’s authority.…

    • 330 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    A Peopl

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This movement to get rid of the Indians was aided by General Jackson, who set the Indian removal into effect in the war of 1812. He did this when he battled the great Tecumseh and conquered his allied Indian nation, then started to distribute their lands. Jackson became the leader of the distribution of Indian lands, and distributed them in unequal ways. In 1828 when Jackson was running for President, his platform was based upon Indian Removal, which was a popular issue. Jackson, who won a sweeping victory, began to formulate his strategies on how he would use an "Indian Removal campaign". In 1829, after seeing that his beloved Indian Removal Bill was not being followed, Jackson began dealing with the Indian tribes and offered them "untouchable" tracts of lands west of the Mississippi River if they would only cede their lands to the US and move themselves there.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Age of Jackson Dbq

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act in 1830, dictating that all Indians living in the Deep South had to move to Eastern Oklahoma, because the Indians had something everyone else wanted, land. Jackson says in his First Inaugural Address,“It will be my sincere and constant desire to observe toward the Indian tribes within our limits a just and liberal policy, and to give that humane and considerate attention to their rights and their wants which is consistent with the habits of our Government and the feelings of our people.” Jackson is saying that It will be his genuine and continuous desire towards the Indian tribes, and we want to give them a fair and open policy, and give humane and kind attention to their rights and their wants which is the same with the habits of our government and the feelings of our people. He wants to give the Indian tribes a good policy. Later on, he removes the Indian tribes from their homes in the Deep South and makes them march on the trail of tears, where they relocate to Eastern Oklahoma.…

    • 1307 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As explained in this chapter of Davidson and Lytle’s After the Fact: The Art of Historical Detection, a historical theory is not necessarily a clear and definite principle about something, rather it is an untested hypothesis. Historians incorporate many factors into their theories to help explain events and support their hypotheses, and these focuses affect their basic understanding of history. This is commonly referred to as “Grand Theory”—an overall explanation of phenomena in a particular discipline or realm of experience such as economics, sociology, or history. As we saw in the previous chapter on the Salem Witch Trials, each historian's input and perspective introduced new possibilities and explanations…

    • 2324 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The largest example the author uses to illustrate the repugnant actions of President Jackson is Native American removal. Even before he became president, he worked to acquire Native American land for the United States as treaty commissioner. In his time with that position, he gained large areas of land that would grow the United States. This would seem like an honorable achievement for the country, but Jackson and his fellow commissioners did not always use fair tactics when negotiating with Native American tribes that refused to give up their homes. Not only is this morally wrong, but it is the exact sort of oppression that many American colonists were trying to leave when they declared independence of Great Britain. This…

    • 817 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the 1800’s when America was still developing as a new country, there were still many conflicts proceeding throughout that period. Andrew Jackson served as the seventh president and his main concern was the removal of the Cherokee tribe from their own land. As a result, the Cherokee people were divided amongst themselves because of this act President Jackson wanted to enforce. While many Cherokee people ignored Jackson’s instructions and stayed on their land, few did go to what is now Oklahoma. Even before they were told to migrate to federal lands, the society of Cherokee was still divided. The money distributed throughout their original land was not equal. The rich got more while the poor got less; much like today, still.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Removal Act DBQ

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages

    It is very difficult to prove racism as a driving factor of an issue, but when reading Jackson’s address to Congress regarding the issue of Indian removal, it is evident that there was prejudice and discrimination present in this context. Jackson calls the Indians “savage hunters”, impediments to “white settlement”, and hopes that they will “cast off their savage habits and become an interesting, civilized, Christian community.” Throughout Jackson’s address, it is clear that he believes Colonial settlements and cities are more important to the nation than any Indian matters, and he attempts to lessen the severity of an enormous relocation…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As more and more people migrated to the United States, the government felt that settlers needed more space in the US Territory. They had already forced several Native American tribes off of “US land” by the time Andrew Jackson was President. In the Southwestern United States, the Creek, Cherokee, Choctaw, and Chickasaw tribes excelled in interacting with new settlers. Jackson had been able to maintain a peaceful relationship with these tribes and had even raised a Creek orphan alongside his own son. Although he did not treat them as if they were strangers, he still saw them as inferior. He forced the tribes to split and absorb into the American way of life. At the beginning of his presidency, the Cherokee’s tribal and state governments began…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Andrew Jackson was greatly amiss in his measure to force the Indians out of their homes were their ancestors had lived in long ago. Thus because, he used brutal force and harsh conditions before and during the removal of the Indian tribes. “Men paid to move the Cherokee Nation are cruel”(Cherokee). This segment was published on April 4, 1838 along with other various articles, and explains that the Cherokee new that the government would not treat them with respect nor kindness. While disliked by the vast majority of Indians, most of the everyday people actually admired Jackson because they saw him as somewhat of a hero because he gave the perception that the Indians were uncivilized savages, and by removing them he…

    • 241 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In April of 1818, General Andrew Jackson led his second campaign through west Florida engaging both Indians and Spanish fortifications throughout the region. The consequences of his actions had many far reaching effects. These are entries from the General's journal to provide an inside perspective of the situation. All negative opinions displayed toward native Americans and other minority groups were likely held by General Jackson, but they in no way reflect those held by the author. March 20th 1818…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cherokee Removal Analysis

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In the treaty, it states that the American government would give five million dollars to Cherokees to help them settle in the new territory. Even more, the treaty promised that doctors, medicine, food would be provided during the route to the new Indian territory. As the supporters of this treaty believe that the removal was inevitable, they attempt to receive a deal for the American Indians. They hope to at least provide sufficient resources on the way to the new land. However, the action of this treaty provoked angry Cherokees because they viewed this as a betrayal of the nation. As most of the Cherokees continued to fight against the removal, the supporters of the treaty were deeply detested. Even though Boudinot had a different insight of the removal, his advocacy is another example of American Indians speaking up for themselves. He strived to seek for a better solution of this forced removal and aimed to lower the harm to American Indians to the minimum. Despite all efforts, at the end, the Treaty of the Echota did not live up to its expectation. There was around 16,000 Cherokees that were forcibly removed and 4,000 of them died. One fourth of the Cherokees during the removal died because of starvation and various diseases. This shows that even though the Cherokee advocated for a harmless and…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays