Preview

Analyzing Jacques Futrelle's 'The Problem Of Cell 13'

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
390 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analyzing Jacques Futrelle's 'The Problem Of Cell 13'
In “The Problem of Cell 13”, Jacques Futrelle tells how a scientist, Professor Van Dusen (also known as The Thinking Machine) takes on an experiment challenged by his friends, Dr. Charles Ransom and Alfred Fielding. The challenge he accepts is to escape a death-cell in Chisholm Prison within 7 days. He requests three harmful things: tooth powder, his boots polished, and $25. (Two 10s and a 5) The purpose of proving this experiment is because Dusen believes “Nothing is impossible. The mind is master of all things.”
As professor Van Dusen is placed in cell 13, he examines the cell, sees an iron-barred window and finds out he would need to pass through seven other doors which, the jailer only has two keys too. On day two and three Dusen writes

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    You should have been able to see cytoplasmic streaming (the movement of chloroplasts and other organelles within the cell.…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cell Biology Final

    • 30085 Words
    • 121 Pages

    1. The feature that most clearly separates eukaryotes from prokaryotes is the presence of _______ in eukaryotic cells.…

    • 30085 Words
    • 121 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Once this began Mr. Dufresne stopped getting raped by a well known gang called "The Sisters", led by Bogs Diamond. As a payment to Mr. Dufresne he was allowed to keep his own cell for most of his time in Shawshank, Bogs was beaten up very badly, and he was granted the privilege of working in the library with Brooksie Hatlen instead of the laundry room like the other prisoners.…

    • 922 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In discussions of the Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by Philip G. Zimbardo in 1970, one controversial issue has been whether or not the experiment should have ever been attempted. On the one hand, Dr. Zimbardo and his colleagues argued that the experiment gave them a deeper understanding of human suffering and a greater empathy for their fellow man (Ratnesar 2011). On the other hand, one of the former guards contended that the experiment made him more hostile and less sympathetic during his time as a guard and that the circumstances significantly altered his perception of what was appropriate behavior. Others even maintain that the prison experiment degraded the prisoners so greatly, empowered the guards to such a great extent, and even affected Dr. Zimbardo’s behavior and mannerisms so dramatically that it thoroughly altered their sense of…

    • 1846 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The simulated prison included three six by nine-foot cells. Each cell held inmates that included three cots. There was a tiny space three that was designed to look like solitary confinement, and another small room to act as the prison yard. Of the 24 volunteers 3 of them were prison guards that worked eight hour shifts around the clock for the next two weeks. While the experiment slated to last 14 days, it had to…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cell Quiz

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Tobacco smokers (and those exposed to tobacco smoke) are at greater risk of an ectopic (tubal) pregnancy. Based on your understanding of the structures of the cytoskeleton, what is the best explanation?…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment began just like any other, with a general question: “Would a negative environment would be able to control…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Phillip K. Zimbardo, who is a professor of psychology at Stanford University, directed the Stanford Prison Experiment, also known as the Zimbardo Experiment. The goal of the Zimbardo experiment was to research how willing human beings would imitate to the characters of correctional officers and inmates in an acting role that replicated life behind bars. But what really happens when you remove the freedoms of human beings and place them in subservient positions and place them in jail cell type settings? The answer is that the mind and physical well-being is drastically and forever changed for the worse, which Mr. Zimbardo’s tests proved.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Xavier, R. (2008, January 5th). The Stanford Prison Experiment: Exploring the Ethical Issues. Retrieved July 18th, 2012, from Yahoo: http://voices.yahoo.com/the-stanford-prison-experiment-exploring-ethical-563843.html…

    • 2122 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zimbardo Prison Eperiment

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The experiment took place in the basement of the Psychology department in Stanford University and selected 24 undergraduate students out of 70 volunteers due to their lack of psychological issues and had no criminal record. Zimbardo paid each of the 24 participants 15 dollars a day in a span of one to two weeks. The 24 volunteers were randomly assigned to play a role as either a guard or a prisoner. The cell was made up of three prison cells, each one holding three mock prisoners. The guards chosen had to work in an eight hour shift alongside two other participants. The guards chosen have their own cell to themselves and one small room for solitary confinement. Kendra Cherry stated in her article that, “According to Zimbardo and his colleagues, the Stanford Prison Experiment demonstrates the powerful role that the situation can play in human behavior” (Cherry). The volunteers for this experiments took on their role almost instantaneously.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Taser

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages

    O’Toole, K. (1997). The Stanford Prison Experiment: Still powerful after all these years. Stanford News Service , 1.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When inmates enter the institution, they are thoroughly searched and their clothes and personal effects are taken from them. They are told that they may not cause trouble and no political speeches will be allowed. They may write one letter each week and attend church only on Sunday. If they violate any rules, they will immediately be put in solitary confinement without any food for 24 hours. Because of the high inmate population, there are four inmates to each of the cells, which were designed and built for one. Two inmates must sleep directly on the concrete floor. Inmates who get seriously ill have no access to medical care.…

    • 587 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This experiment performed by Harry Harlow and his team is a great example of why solitary confinement should not be allowed because it shows the many irreversible damaging effects it can have on a person. Creating a being such as this is not what this society should be trying to produce. This society should only be promoting options that help the troubled and damaged population, not ones that only worsen the damage.…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    While his experiment seems twisted and immoral, the reality is that it is phenomenally ambitious and quite visionary. The creation of life from pieces of inanimate flesh is certainly the epitome of genius by any standards, even those of modern times. By his astounding actions, he sets himself apart from all mankind, reigning at the pinnacle of progressive science. It is this very fact that Fry explains calls the lightning of misfortune to strike this heroic genius, and send him onto a path towards utter misery (1).…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The stanford prison experiment is one of the infamous experiments conducted in the history of psychology. The experiment was conducted at Stanford University in August, 1971 by a team of researchers led by psychology professor Philip Zimbardo. The basic premise was to find out and determine what happens when you put good people in an evil place? Does humanity win over evil, or does evil triumph? Does the system that we inhabit and are a part of start to control our behaviour or our inner morality and values continue to direct it? It was a study of the psychological effects of becoming a prisoner or a prison guard. To carry out this experiment, a subterranean jail was set up in the psychology department building. Adverts were placed in local newspapers offering $15 per day for participants in this program. Of the 75 responses, the 24 male subjects judged to be most mentally and emotionally stable were selected. Those 24 were then divided into two groups randomly, of 12 prisoners and 12 guards. The group selected to be the guards were outfitted in ‘military-style’ intimidating uniforms. They were also equipped with wooden batons and mirrored shades, to prevent eye-contact and make the guards appear less human. The researchers held an orientation session for guards the day before the experiment, during which they instructed them not to physically harm the prisoners. In the footage of the study, Zimbardo can be seen talking to the guards: "You can create in the prisoners feelings of boredom, a sense of fear to some degree, you can create a notion of arbitrariness that their life is totally controlled by us, by the system, you, me, and they'll have no privacy... We're going to take away their individuality in various ways. In general what all this leads to is a sense of powerlessness. That is, in this situation we'll have all the power and they'll have none." The prisoners were instructed to wait at home "to be called" for the start of…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays