Analyze The Characters
Submitted by: Roll # 311
Analyze the characters, businessman and poet, in the play: Fog.
Considering that I’m permitted to write this assignment in an informal way, I’m going to take the full advantage of it, to express whatever sensible [don’t count on it] idea I have in my mind regarding the topic of the assignment, the play or the characters of the play.
First of all, the topic is great as long as I’m just under the obligation of discussing the characters but not when you’ve given us a roadmap [flat/round & dynamic/static blah...] because now I guess I’m not supposed to wander a lot; although, contrarily, I believe that the wandering area is actually where one could have found the answers to most of the questions or at least the things the playwright wanted us to notice. I’m not certain, though. And you’re strict!
Second of all, the writer has made it almost impossible to distinguish between the two main characters of the play since they both share, at some parts, same attitude. Same attitude in two people in real life could make sense and is acceptable but not in a work of art where motifs are differently, purposefully added to give it (the work of art) the respective meaning that is to be drawn out by the reader. This could also be a plus that, maybe, the writer successfully put-forth the reality in his play rather than the romanticized picture that is accustomed to be portrayed in Television or books. Otherwise the play with nothing romanticized or exaggerated in it, has no reason to be written as it seldom leaves an impact on the reader and also when it has nothing ‘apparently perceptible’ to be offered to the reader, it becomes baseless to the majority. I’m not certain of this claim, again.
Here’s a quick review of the statements given by the businessman and the poet that confuses the reader to analyze whether what kind of assumptions one could draw from them:
In the beginning, the playwright has made the businessman look like an optimist, while the
Analyze the characters, businessman and poet, in the play: Fog.
Considering that I’m permitted to write this assignment in an informal way, I’m going to take the full advantage of it, to express whatever sensible [don’t count on it] idea I have in my mind regarding the topic of the assignment, the play or the characters of the play.
First of all, the topic is great as long as I’m just under the obligation of discussing the characters but not when you’ve given us a roadmap [flat/round & dynamic/static blah...] because now I guess I’m not supposed to wander a lot; although, contrarily, I believe that the wandering area is actually where one could have found the answers to most of the questions or at least the things the playwright wanted us to notice. I’m not certain, though. And you’re strict!
Second of all, the writer has made it almost impossible to distinguish between the two main characters of the play since they both share, at some parts, same attitude. Same attitude in two people in real life could make sense and is acceptable but not in a work of art where motifs are differently, purposefully added to give it (the work of art) the respective meaning that is to be drawn out by the reader. This could also be a plus that, maybe, the writer successfully put-forth the reality in his play rather than the romanticized picture that is accustomed to be portrayed in Television or books. Otherwise the play with nothing romanticized or exaggerated in it, has no reason to be written as it seldom leaves an impact on the reader and also when it has nothing ‘apparently perceptible’ to be offered to the reader, it becomes baseless to the majority. I’m not certain of this claim, again.
Here’s a quick review of the statements given by the businessman and the poet that confuses the reader to analyze whether what kind of assumptions one could draw from them:
In the beginning, the playwright has made the businessman look like an optimist, while the