Preview

Analysis Of Seltzer's Catch-22

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
138 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analysis Of Seltzer's Catch-22
Seltzer’s essay revolves around the idea correlating with absurdity, morality, and sanity together. Seltzer alludes the given the popularity of some corrupt characters, they have the power to influence others and are responsible for their corruption. The essay presents the argument that the absurdity in Catch-22 is a direct result of moral insanity. Seltzer then concludes that the law Catch-22 is not only a symbol for a power bureaucracy, but also the explanation of the immoral uncontrolled opportunism of the officers in the war. This source is helpful in that rather than discussing the themes of absurdity, morality, and sanity, the essay offers analysis on how they relate to each other and the effect they have on an individual. Furthermore,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Situational irony highlights the cyclical exploitation of power that contradict the development of Animal Farm and illustrates Orwell’s interpretation of how the Russian Revolution ended and the aftermath. For example, after Snowball’s apparent victory as a faction and the supposed peace to have followed, Napoleon “...uttered a high-pitched whimper...at this there was a terrible baying sound outside, nine enormous dogs wearing brass-studded collars came bounding into the barn” (Orwell 53). The sudden intrusion of the black dogs interrupted the flow of the story and the predicted outcome of Snowball’s win. Such a blatant…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    "Everyone is aware of the difficult and menacing situation in which human society - shrunk into one community with a common fate - finds itself, but only a few acts accordingly. Most people go on living their everyday life: half frightened, half indifferent, they behold the ghostly tragicomedy this is being performed on the international stage before the eyes and ears of the world. But on that stage, on which the actors under the floodlights play their ordained parts, our fate of tomorrow, life or death of the nations, is being decided. It would be different if the problem were not one of things made by man himself, such as the atomic bomb and other means of mass destruction equally menacing all peoples. It would be different, for instance, if an epidemic of bubonic plague were threatening the entire world. In such a case conscientious and expert persons would be brought together and they would work out an intelligent plan to combat the plague. After having reached agreement upon the right ways and means, they would submit their plan to the governments. Those would hardly raise serious objections but rather agree speedily on the measures to be taken. They certainly would never think of trying to handle the matter in such a way that their own nation would be spared whereas the next one would be decimated. But could not our situation be compared to one of a menacing epidemic? People are unable to view this situation in its true light, for their eyes are blinded by passion. General fear and anxiety create hatred and aggressiveness. The adaptation to warlike aims and activities has corrupted the mentality of man; as a result, intelligent, objective, and humane thinking has hardly any effect and is even suspected and persecuted as unpatriotic. There are, no doubt, in the opposite camps enough people of sound judgment and sense of justice who would be capable and eager to work out together a solution for the factual…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Maass refers to the dark moments in humanity as “the wild beast,’ where inhumanity runs amok and all morality is lost. After reading this story it can be figured that Maass went as a reporter to the Balkans at the height of the salvage war there, but this story is not traditional war reportage. It can be seen that Maass’ brilliantly observed a moving memoir of the worst event of violence in Europe during the Bosnian War, since World War II. In his story of “The Wild Beast” he writes about what he saw during the two years of war in Bosnia for the Washington Post. Maass offers “one of the definitive accounts of Bosnia’s fin de siècle descent into madness” writing in the tradition of Ryszard Kapuscinski and Michael Herr’s Dispacthes (Random House). Mass captures the national, personal, and universal implications of a civil war.…

    • 1294 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first common element between Zinnemann’s movie and Woolsey’s article is that in both situations, the traditional law system failed. Be it the governor who pardoned Frank Miller (the gangster) for his crime, or international agreements that normally forbid Iran, Iraq and North Korea to produce mass destruction weapons and that condemn their political regime. Hence, in order to protect civilians, an alternative, more efficient method has to be employed, i.e. the “law of the West” or War.…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In this chapter, Walzer discusses the cruelty of war and whether there can be any justification for such cruelty. He begins by distinguishing between the justice of war (jus ad bellum) and the justice in war (jus in bello). "War is always judged twice, first with reference to the reasons states have for fighting, secondly with reference to the means they adopt." (p.21).…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    All societies have a basic structure, and in order to function well with others, a person must conform to the laws and regulations of said society. In the novels Fight Club by Chuck Palahniuk and One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest by Ken Kesey, a variety of themes are discussed, with the major theme being rebellion. The main characters of both these novels struggle with the established structure they are living in and are unwilling to conform to its rules. They both rebel by openly defying laws, and disobeying authoritative figures. The novels’ main characters are furthermore comparable because they not only rebel but also guide others to do the same. The men whom they lead carry on their acts even after their guides have stopped, either on their own accord (in the case of Fight Club) or after they are stopped by an antagonist (as in One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest). In a comparison between the two novels, the ideas of a “system,” emasculation, monotony, and self-sacrifice showcase the central theme of rebellion.…

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To conclude, there is no doubt that the conflict of war is a useless encounter that affects many innocent people’s lives, the economic stability and physiological wellbeing of soldiers. It is evident that in some circumstances society makes war to ensure peace, and on the surface this seems rational, even plausible. However, in reality throughout the journey there is a great human and economic cost…

    • 66 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    combat high

    • 548 Words
    • 2 Pages

    In the essay “Combat High”, written by Sebastian Junger, shows how war can be both rewarding and exciting, but also how the war can be very costly at the same time. Many people look down upon war, but Junger does a very good job showing both the pros and cons about war.…

    • 548 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A large sector of just war theory references several moral and legal implications that must be evaluated prior to engaging in attack. The legalist paradigm, as expressed by theorist and author Michael Walzer in his book Just and Unjust Wars1, evaluates the conditions that constitute just war, and elaborates on several of the key circumstances that are required to impose just war on others. Despite its strengths, this paradigm is often evaluated as being a “strawman”, and provides only a foundation for which several other nuanced views can expand on. One fundamental idea expressed in his claims though, is the idea that “nothing but aggression can justify war”1. Through this, Walzer establishes the only moral precedent for which a counter-attack…

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Heller

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Heller’s first play, We Bombed in New Haven, which was published in 1967, concerns a group of actors who believe they are portraying an Air Force squadron in an unspecified modern war. The action alternates between scenes where the players act out their parts in the script and scenes where they communicate among themselves out of "character," expressing dissatisfaction with their roles as being in the military. This technique, recalls the work of Bertolt Brecht and Luigi Pirandello. It alerts the audience to the play's artificiality. This work, as seen in Catch 22, exposes what Heller perceives as the illogic and moral bankruptcy of the United States military. Many critics have interpreted We Bombed in New Haven as a protest against America's participation in the Vietnam War.…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Several conflicting frames of mind have played defining roles in shaping humanity throughout the twentieth century. Philosophical optimism of a bright future held by humanity in general was taken advantage of by the promise of a better life through sacrifice of individuality to the state. In the books Brave New World, 1984, and Fahrenheit 451 clear opposition to these subtle entrapments was voiced in similarly convincing ways. They first all established, to varying degrees of balance, the atmosphere and seductiveness of the "utopia" and the fear of the consequences of acting in the non-prescribed way through character development. A single character is alienated because of their inability to conform – often in protest to the forced conditions of happiness and well being. Their struggle is to hide this fact from the state's relentless supervision of (supposedly) everything. This leads them to eventually come into conflict with some hand of the state which serves as the authors voice presenting the reader with the ‘absurdity' of the principles on which the society is based. The similar fear of the state's abuse of power and technology at the expense of human individuality present within these novels speaks to the relevance of these novels within their historical context and their usefulness for awakening people to the horrendous consequences of their ignorance.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, we should understand the differences O’Driscoll points out between contemporary and conventional jus ad bellum. O’Driscoll points out that contemporary jus ad bellum justifies punitive wars with a more moral and religious agenda. O’Driscoll points out that wars were usually justified because God commanded the punishment of the wrongdoers and the evils of the world. The author uses two examples from other just war theorist such as O’Donavan and Elshtain, who write books about contemporary just war theory and the moral and religious aspect in…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    boogie man

    • 7057 Words
    • 29 Pages

    here is, however, another symptom in our fellow-citizens of the world which has perhaps astonished and shocked us no less than the descent from their ethical heights which has so greatly distressed us. What I have in mind is the want of insight shown by the best intellects, their obduracy, their inaccessibility to the most forcible arguments and their uncritical credulity towards the most disputable assertions. This indeed presents a lamentable picture, and I wish to say emphatically that in this I am by no means a blind partisan who finds all the intellectual short-comings on one side. But this phenomenon is much easier to account for and much less disquieting than the one we have just considered. Students of human nature and philosophers have long taught us that we are mistaken in regarding our intelligence as an independent force and in overlooking its dependence on emotional life. Our intellect, they teach us, can function reliably only when it is removed from the influences of strong emotional impulses; otherwise it behaves merely as an instrument of the will and delivers the inference which the will requires. Thus, in their view, logical arguments are impotent against affective interests, and that is why disputes backed by reasons, which in Falstaff's phrase are 'as plenty as blackberries', produce so few victories in the conflict with interests. Psycho-analytic experience has, if possible, further confirmed this statement. It can show every day that the shrewdest people will all of a sudden behave without insight, like imbeciles, as soon as the necessary insight is confronted by an emotional resistance, but that they will completely regain their understanding once that resistance has been overcome. The logical bedazzlement which this war has conjured up in our fellow-citizens, many of them the best of their kind, is…

    • 7057 Words
    • 29 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    War, no matter how large or small, always has some consequences. World War I was no exception, and the greater the war, the greater the consequences. While every person may experience unique consequences, every circumstance provides both positive and negative repercussions. In Siegfried Sassoon’s Absolution, the speaker attempts to depict both the positive and negative outcomes of World War I. Sassoon uses metaphors to convey the speaker’s tone of acknowledgment, matured perspective, and wisdom.…

    • 615 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sam Shepard's Chicago

    • 3202 Words
    • 13 Pages

    Ever since the term “absurd” was used by Alber Camus in his essay “The Myth of Sisyphus”, it attracted a lot of attention (“Absurdism”). Camus was one among the many intellectuals and artists who were, by the end of the Second World War, reciprocally disappointed at the state in which the terrors of war had left humanity. This overwhelming feeling of despair had been appropriately compared by Camus to the Sisyphus’s condemnation and the whole existence of the contemporary humanity to the act of repeatedly pushing the boulder just to watch it fall down the hill again and again. As we will be mainly interested in the appearance of the absurd in drama, it should be emphasized that the topic of absurdity, so closely related to the terms postmodern, avant-garde and experimental, has been overtly present in all other artistic media, genres and fields of activities, as well, all of which have tried to express the newly formulated idea of the modern world. And the drama of absurd, alike, could not be said to represent a unified movement but rather a “a complex pattern of similarities in approach, method, and convention, of shared philosophical and artistic premises, whether conscious or subconscious, and of influences from a common store of tradition”; helpful as it is, for the literary analysis, “it is not a binding classification; it is certainly not all-embracing or exclusive”(Esslin).…

    • 3202 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays