Preview

Analysis Of Merleau-Ponty's Phenomenology

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3710 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Analysis Of Merleau-Ponty's Phenomenology
Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology: A Gift to Epistemology
Reuben John B. Valentin

Abstract: One of the fundamental question of epistemology is on how man can acquire knowledge? What means can man use to overcome state of ignorance? This question is critically touched during the Renaissance the jump from the God questions and focus on a more humane one, the man questions.The likes of Descartes who comprises the bulk of the rationalist started the period but as their ideas were articulated and read by other philosophers either people agree to them and improve. their thoughts or disagree to their claims and trying to debunk their claims. One of the extreme debunker of rationalism are the empiricists upholding that the medium of knowing is the use
…show more content…
Obviously it is not the helplessness but what the helplessness paved to emerge, from being brute to being rational. It is man’s intellectual capacity that aid man, to survive the freezing ice age 10,000 years ago , to outlast prehistoric predators by means of weapons and strategies and kept man living until now. As was mentioned awhile ago, it is man’s intellectual capacity that paved man in surviving the terrors of the prehistoric. Actually such is incomplete without the ideas of man being subjected into action, “An idea is a deferred action,”John Dewey might said. There is a question how come man act in such manner ?How did he build up the ideas and put it in action?What is with such capacity that paved man into making the best out of survival? Man uses his perception, the researcher called it the double-edged sword of knowledge. Perception is oftentimes substituted to sensation wherein a perceiver sees the apple via senses. In Psychology, perception is the process of interpreting the sensation we experience for a proper act to be done. So perception is distinct from the sensation due to the fact that it involves the analyzation of the stimulus that entered through the senses. Perception as the study continues will piece by piece unravel its very purpose in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    When looking upon any thinkers in recorded history, we must analyze the influences, assuming there are some, that provide a foundation or stemmed the creation of the thinkers line of thought or view on a subject. For instance, the philosophes of the Enlightenment are often assumed to have formulated their ideas single-handedly but if we were to analyze their thoughts we would see all of them stem from other ideas, or directly oppose thinker’s views from the Scientific Revolution, such as the relationship or similarities of Humanity and Nature, the use of the Scientific Method, and the ongoing debate on religion and its place in human affairs.…

    • 1876 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mark Twain expresses his feelings about humankind by saying that rather than evolving into creatures who are intelligent, we devolved into a dumb species of brutes and maniacs. What he means by saying this is when we want something, we don't necessarily need it. Animals like the predators only kill what they need to survive. Humans spoil this by taking things in greedy manners to satisfy their infinite hunger for material needs. Mark Twain makes a good analysis on humans by saying that, but not all of that is true to a certain degree.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Critique of Pure Reason Kant discusses the dispute between rationalism and empiricism. The empiricists argued that all ideas are derived from sensation, and that objects of sensation are the only proper objects of knowledge. The rationalists argued that some ideas are not derived from sensation but are instead innate to reason, and that these ideas provide one with knowledge of supersensible realities such as God. Kant argues how knowledge is devoted to the power of demonstrating the truth or falsity of an idea, and that this power is restricted to the domain of sensibility. He stated that…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Four Eras of Writing

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages

    With the European Enlightenment, came more of an intellectual and natural way of thinking. Couvares notes how the “rationalist historians”, greatly influenced by Newton and Locke, prospered along with the…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Descartes vs Locke

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Socrates once said, “As for me, all I know is that I know nothing.” Several philosophers contradicted Socrates’ outlook and believed that true knowledge was in fact attainable. This epistemological view however had several stances to it, as philosophers held different beliefs in regards to the derivation of true knowledge. Rationalists believed that the mind was the source of true knowledge, while in Empiricism, true knowledge derived from the senses. Rene Descartes, a rationalist, and John Locke, an empiricist, were prime examples of epistemologists who were seen to differentiate greatly within each of their philosophies. However, although Descartes and Locke’s ideas did contrast in that sense, they both shared common concepts that helped mould the basis of their ideas.…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rene Descartes started his first meditation with a simple question: “What can be called into doubt?” Descartes explains that many of his preconceived notions had been proven false and it made him question many things that he had found to be true in life. Instead of dismantling every belief or fact he thought he knew to be true, he started by undermining his own beliefs by questioning their foundations. The question remains, however, why he began doing this in the first place. Towards the end of the meditation in the eleventh paragraph, Descartes concludes “the task now in hand does not involve action but merely the acquisition of knowledge,” which nicely sums up what his…

    • 334 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We have no protective furs or skin modifications, our strength is laughable in comparison to the lions and gorillas of the world, and the endurance is not significant enough for survival without food and water for even a week. Needless to say we didn’t become the powerful force that we are today by using our muscles. That idea, that humanity came to dominate earth as we know it not by any special physical attribute; but by the remarkable ability of our brains to conceptualize good, bad and learn from observation, is what Siegel theorizes is the great downfall of the modern layperson in his book the “Mindfulness Solution”.…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rene Descartes’s philosophy aimed at finding an answer to all the mysteries of nature, based on mathematical reason. In his Meditations on First Philosophy, Descartes demonstrates the grounds on which people may doubt all things, the distinction between mind and body, God (which will not be discussed here), what is really true and the distinction between imagination and understanding. These arguments as set out in Mediations I – VI, form the basis of Rene Descartes’ philosophy. In Meditation I, Descartes argues that most of all he had known to be true was in reality false.…

    • 660 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Epistemology is a philosophy that specifically focuses on the scope of knowledge. In a sense the questions is asked “what we know” or “What we can be sure of”. These are the basic fundamentals that surround how we think. In this paper, I will discuss views presented by philosophers that relate to me and my profession. In addition, I will explore the similarities and differences in epistemology.…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Modern philosophy began with an enthusiastic faith in the powers of human reason to reach the truth. It represented a protest against the methods of Scholasticism and demanded a free field for unrestricted inquiry to work out its own salvation.[2]”…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The dispute between rationalism and empiricism concerns the extent to which we are dependent upon sense experience, and the doubt of everything in effort to gain knowledge. Philosophers have deepened our knowledge as to how we will approach the education of young children, whether it will be the rationalism or empiricism approach. John Locke was an empiricist because he believed our knowledge comes to us from experience, specifically the faculties of sensation and reflection. On the other hand, the rationalists believe that the source of knowledge is reason, not experience. The knowledge that comes from reason leads us to philosopher Descartes, whom believes reason is the only method to attaining knowledge. These two approaches lead to confusion…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Al-Ghazali and Decartes

    • 2947 Words
    • 12 Pages

    In this essay I will explain Al-Ghazali’s skeptical epistemological project described in his autobiography, Deliverance from Error. By doing so, I will explain his investigation on the certainty and reliability of knowledge attained through sense-perception and intellectual truths (reason). I will also explain why he doubts knowledge attained through the senses and how he uses dreams to doubt intellectual truths. I will continue by summarizing his religious epistemological theory in which he describes the Sufi mystic experience and how it relates to certain and reliable knowledge. By explaining his religious epistemological theory, I will thereby explain the connection between goals and knowledge. Subsequently, I will explain Descartes’ skeptical epistemological project described in his Meditations I and II. By doing so I will describe his search for certain knowledge, in which he finds doubt in the foundations of most of his beliefs, particularly beliefs created by sense-perception. Then, I will explain his dream conjecture and his demon conjecture. I will continue by explaining what certain knowledge he finds by using the demon conjecture. Following, I will compare and contrast ideas of Descartes and Al- Ghazali; such as their quest for certain knowledge, doubting the senses, their dream theories, and lastly their conclusions on what qualifies as certain knowledge. Finally, I will assume that the supernatural does not exist and observe whether Descartes and Al-Ghazali’s concepts such as: doubting the senses, dream theories, and approaches and conclusions for certain knowledge, still hold without the element of the supernatural.…

    • 2947 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In this paper, I will explore the topic of knowledge innatism and define what it is and what it isn’t, Locke’s objections to it, and responses to these objections. After raising an objection, I will argue either that 1) this objection is weak or 2) this objection works.…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Descartes and Augustine, in their respective examinations of the mind and God, come to the conclusion that the true understanding of all things derives from the withdrawal of the self from foreign influence and the necessity to look inward. Although each thinker’s journey or course of understanding was different, and at times rather contrasting, their ultimate realizations about knowledge are very coherent.…

    • 1609 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    “That which is accepted as knowledge today is sometimes discarded tomorrow.” This quote appears to imply that knowledge, which often results in facts and claims, might be discarded or provisional as time passes. The question asks to what extent is knowledge a subject to change over time. Therefore, often knowledge might become re-interpreted when new evidence, discoveries or technology are identified. In this essay, knowledge could be seen as a simplified map of a representation of reality. Within the essay two areas of knowledge will be investigated- human science and the arts. They seem to have opposing perspective on the knowledge issues raised by the question. Within the human science, which focuses on sense perception, logic and reason, the claim that knowledge is provision is true, as within this area of knowledge, a fact will go thought a process of experimenting and testing before it is recognized as knowledge and so it is easier to falsify an idea. However, within the arts, which is based on emotion and imagination, knowledge is easier accepted and therefore it is more difficult to falsify.…

    • 1717 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays