Preview

An Examination of the Boundaries of, and the Theoretical Justification for Judicial Review in Tanzania.

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3657 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
An Examination of the Boundaries of, and the Theoretical Justification for Judicial Review in Tanzania.
TUMAINI UNIVERSITY
IRINGA UNIVERSITY COLLEGE
FACULTY OF LAW

RESEARCH PROPOSAL

RESEARCHERS:

❑ JESCA KABISSA ❑ PETER R. THADEO

SUPERVISOR:

❑ MISS. RUHUNDWA

TOPIC: AN EXAMINATION OF THE BOUNDARIES OF, AND THE THEORETICAL JUSTIFICATION FOR JUDICIAL REVIEW IN TANZANIA.

CONTENT PAGE 1. Introduction ------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 1. Administrative Authority, the overview ----------------- - 2 2. Types of Administrative Authority --------------------------- 2 2. Useful of the study ------------------------------------------------------------ 3 3. Background to the Problem ------------------------------------------------- 4 1. Judicial Review, defined ------------------------------------------- 4 2. Historical Background of Judicial Review -------------------- 4 3. Introduction of Judicial Review in Tanzania ------------------ 5 4. Boundaries of Judicial Review ------------------------------------ 6 4. Statement of the Problem ----------------------------------------------------- 6 5. Objective of the Study ---------------------------------------------------------- 6 6. Study Hypotheses ---------------------------------------------------------------- 7 7. Significances of the Study ----------------------------------------------------- 7 8. Literature Review ----------------------------------------------------------------- 8 9. Scope of the Research ----------------------------------------------------------- 12
10. Research Methodology ---------------------------------------------------------- 13 1. Documentary Review ------------------------------------------------ 13 2. Interview



Bibliography: Kay J., Swot Administrative Law, (1999), Blackstone Press Limited, London. Oludeye, P.A., Administrative Law in East Africa, (1981), Kenya Literature Bureau, Nairobi. Research Paper No. 6/44, Judicial Review: A short Guide to Claims in Administrative Court, by Alexander Horne, UK Report of Scoping on Judicial review of decision of Crown Court, 1999. Sathe, S.P., Administrative Law, (7th Ed.), (2004), Butterworth, New Delhi. Wade, H.W.R. and C.F. Forsyth, Administrative Law, (Ninth Ed.), (2004) Oxford University Press, Great Britain. [2] As per Durga Das Basu, Administrative Law (2000). [3] (1955) 2 SCR 225 [4] As per Durga Das Basu (2000)

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Centralia Mine

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    References: Stillman, R.J. III (2010). Public administration concepts and cases. Boston, MA: Wadsworth, Cenage Learning.…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Centralia Mine No. 5

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Stillman, R.J. (2010). Public administration: Concepts and cases: 2010 custom edition. (9th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin – Cengage Learning.…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    McInnes et al., Managing the Law: The Legal Aspects of Doing Business, 4th edition (Toronto: Pearson Canada, 2013).…

    • 3599 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Continuum of Legal Formality . There are a range of administrative procedures available to public administrators to handle administrative law issues. Administrators may accomplish tasks through informal procedures or they may conduct formal hearings. Statute may determine which procedures must be followed, or it may be up to the administrator’s ...…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Public administrators face many obstacles and roadblocks in order to efficiently run their agencies. Sometimes, the legislative laws, or rules they have to abide by need to be altered, or utilized in a fashion to better maintain the everyday need of the agency. In order to make sure that the administrator is using discretion that follows the laws of the this country, objective responsibility, subjective responsibility and representative bureaucracy all play a role.…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Hawkins K (2002), Law as Last Resort; Prosecution decision making in a regulatory agency (Oxford: OUP)…

    • 2974 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    this essay I will attempt to examine and analyse the effectiveness of international courts and…

    • 840 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Public Admin

    • 2486 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Wilson, W. (1887). The study of administration. In Shafritz, J. M., & Hyde, A. C. (Eds.) (1997). Classics of public administration (4th ed.) (p.14-26). Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.…

    • 2486 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    No Evidence Rule

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Administrative Law, Trimester 2, 2012 Assignment Question „[The] statutory “no evidence” ground of judicial review is both wider and more specific than was the case with “no evidence” grounds for judicial review at common law.‟ Justice Kirby, Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Rajamanikkam [2002] 210 CLR 222, at [111]. Of the judgments in Rajamanikkam, which do you prefer, and what justification can you provide for your preference? In answering the question, you should read the following three prescribed cases. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Rajamanikkam (2002) 210 CLR 222 Television Capricornia Pty Ltd v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal (1986) 13 FCR 511 SGFB v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2002) FCAFC 422 You may, however, also choose to read the following supplementary reading. The supplementary reading consists of the following three cases. Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 Curragh Queensland Mining Ltd v Daniel (1992) 34 FCR 212 Sunchen Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (2010) FCA 21 The supplementary reading also consists of the following article. Andrew Pinchin, ‘No Evidence’ and ‘Mistake of Fact’: A Reconsideration (2007) 55 AIAL Forum 59-85 This supplementary reading might assist your understanding, but students will not be penalised for not referring to it, nor rewarded for referring to it. The focus should be on the prescribed reading for the assignment. As this is a reflective and not a research essay, you should not refer to material outside the prescribed and supplementary reading. You should follow the advice below, but also the advice given in the Study Guide on the assignment. Note especially the reference to penalties if the 1500 word limit is exceeded. You should also follow any further advice on the question provided in lecture notes. Some advice on the assignment The question requires students to reflect on primary material, rather than merely…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Elliott. C & Quinn. F (2010), English Legal System (11th ). London : Pearson Education Limited…

    • 2195 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Bibliography: The English Legal System – 9th Edition (2008/2009) by Catherine Elliot and Frances Quinn…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    [Judicial review of administrative action has traditionally had a procedural focus. This means that courts examine the procedure by which a decision is made, rather than the decision itself. A denial of natural justice is no exception to review — a person dissatisfied with an administrative decision has long been able to complain about the fairness of the decision-making process but not the fairness of the decision itself. English law has recently developed a doctrine of ‘substantive unfairness’ by which an expectation about the outcome of a decision-making process can be protected by the courts in a strong sense. The strength of the protection given under this new doctrine seems to blur the distinction between process and outcomes, which leads judicial review in a radical new direction. This article explains the English doctrine of substantive unfairness and considers whether it can and should be adopted in Australia.]…

    • 31656 Words
    • 127 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    History of the Common Law

    • 6889 Words
    • 28 Pages

    (a) Outline what is meant by alternative dispute resolution and how it operates within the civil justice system – 14 marks…

    • 6889 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Bradley, A.W. & K.D. Ewing (2011). Constitutional and Administrative Law, 15th edn. Essex Pearson Education Ltd.…

    • 3289 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Montesquieu puts forward the idea that there is no liberty, if the judiciary power is not separated from the legislative and the executive. He said if it were joined with the legislative, the life and liberty of the subject would be exposed to arbitrary control; the judge would then be the legislator. If it were joined with the executive, the judge would behave with violence and oppression1. The principle of separation of powers is the foundation for a democratic state based on the rule of law. The judicial power dispenses justice in disputes between citizens and government and its agencies. Therefore, there is a need to vest this judicial power in a mechanism independent of the legislative and executive powers of the government with adequate guarantees to insulate it from political and other influence to secure its independence and impartiality. The presence of an independent judiciary in a democratic government distinguishes that system from a totalitarian one2. The current form of Westminster government that Australia and Malaysia has adopted keeps the parliament in line with the executive policy. Therefore, the judiciary is seen to be vital in providing the checks and balances. Judicial independence is the very foundation of any worthwhile legal structure. A free society would only exist as long as it is governed by the rule of law, which binds the rulers with the ruled. An independent judiciary is generally an essential requirement for the proper functioning of free and democratic society. The issue of judicial independence involves three fundamental conditions. Security of tenure of the judicial office-bearer, financial security and institutional independence. According to the doctrine of separation of powers, judicial independence is to be taken as a bulwark against the concentration of power in the hands of the Parliament or the bureaucracy. At the practical level, there is a…

    • 6522 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Good Essays