Preview

All I Know Is That I Know Nothing

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1163 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
All I Know Is That I Know Nothing
“All I know is that I know nothing” argued the deep ancient philosopher Socrates. His argument is based on the fact that one cannot know anything with absolute certainty; they could only know something with a fractional amount of confidence. Socrates had written this quote nearly two thousand year ago. With our vast advances in modern technology, science, mathematics, and equipment to record data, over the last two millenniums, one would assume that we would long grow this view of not knowing anything. However, the vaster amount of knowledge we obtain we somehow gain the unveiling of new unknown knowledge. The famous phrase answers breed more questions, suggests that we are in a never ending loop of certainty about reality. Could Socrates be right after all? Do we actually know anything about reality? On a very simple basic level of understanding, questioning reality seems a bit too radical, irrational and just plain stupid. The world would simply be what it is around us; the nature of the objects would be according to our senses. However, as science progressed by, we realized our senses aren’t always right. In fact, we have found many flaws in human perception such as the McGurk effect, which is an illusion, occurs when the auditory component of one sound is paired with the visual component of another sound, leading to the perception of a third sound. An example of this McGurk effect is a when McGurk asked his technician to make a videotape with the audio syllable "ba" dubbed onto a visual "ga." When they played the tape, McGurk and McDonald perceived "da." Confusion reigned until they realized that "da" resulted from a flaw in human perception. He tested it out with children and other subjects who received the same results to realize that even simple human perception of sight and sound can be twisted and tricked. Many other physiological experiments show flaws in human perception such as the blind spot our eyes cannot observe an image correctly, or and certain

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Have you ever wondered whether, Plato, if he were alive in the 20 century, would he be a brilliant movie director, with productions that earned more than $400 million? Both Plato’s “Allegory of Cave” and Andy and Lana Wachowski’s movie “The Matrix” explore the abstruse question of perception of truth. What is truth, and how do we determine what is truth? “I know this steak doesn't exist. I know that when I put it in my mouth, the Matrix is telling my brain that it is juicy and delicious.” This quote from the Matrix vividly illustrates the truth that how people perceive is the way they think, their realization of the truth is due to the world in which they live. Different people may have different perceptions of knowledge, which leads them to a distinct understanding of truth. It is about personal experience seeking the truth, in the process to knowledge - an image does not accurately reflect reality that is the challenge for both Socrates and Neo, the protagonist in the Matrix.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * Consequently, “How can we be sure our brain isn’t being tricked by some simulation to believe things are real, when they aren’t? This is how matrix proposes the challenge of epistemological skepticism.…

    • 383 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato's Cave on Ignorance

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There is a commanding belief that our experiences of reality are just simply deceptions of the truth. In Plato’s “The Allegory of the Cave”, Socrates illustrates his perception about human knowledge. He contends that people are rarely able to escape from personal ignorance and with greater knowledge comes confusion and conflict when their own beliefs are challenged. (Socrates 20)…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Interlocutor Vs Meno

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages

    After observing the unchangeable nature of Meno, Socrates uses his last attempt to differentiate between true knowledge and right opinion, which can lead to similar action and outcomes. His vital note is that right opinion is easy to lose, but true knowledge can be recollected at any time. A person can listen to another's teaching without pondering and assume that he knows the knowledge behind it, while he only possesses transient right opinion, like Meno's receipt of Gorgias's ideas. However, he will never grasp the real knowledge, which will encompass all specific situations and stay within an industrious, pensive, and open…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ex; What is knowledge? Can we know anything for certain? What are the limitations of what we know?…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “[Having] been reduced to the perplexity of realizing that he did not know… he will go on and discover something.” (Meno 84a-d, Lamb translation). He is stating here how the once “ know it all's” are now going to discover new things because now they know they don’t know everything. Socrates believed this was a way everyone should live. “Life without this sort of examination is not worth living.”(Aporia and the wisdom of emptiness, Socrates pg??). “Socrates modeled the ultimate peace within aporia in his confrontation with death, maintaining his curiosity and seriousness, his awe and levity.”(Aporia and the wisdom of emptiness, Socrates pg??) He did his best while speaking to these people that he kept the conversation serious using what he was wondering and lighting the conversation up a bit with his…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The authors also use the term “naive realism” to explain this process. Naive realism is the belief that we are truly objective and others who do not see things the same way as us are irrational and unreasonable. Since we believe we are objective, any evidence that suggests that we were mistaken and did not see things as they truly were cannot be true. We have to reduce the dissonance between our objectivity and our mistaken portrayal of something.…

    • 1927 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Socrates tells the story of prisoners in a cave who were chained up from head to toe and couldn’t even turn their heads. Behind them was a fire and between the fire and them were showmen with puppets casting shadows. The shadows were everything to the prisoners, it was their reality. One day one of the prisoners was able to release himself from the chains and discovered where the shadows came from. Astounded by this reality, he continued walking towards another light shining, and discovered another world outside the cave. Feeling pity for the other prisoners, he went back to tell them about the world outside the cave. Instead of asking about this other world, the prisoners were enraged and threatened to kill the unchained prisoner. This story serves as a metaphor for the state of ignorance, its saying most people live in the world of shadows (Allegory of Cave, Plato). Plato believes knowledge is always better than ignorance. I agree with him. Its always better to know something than to not know anything, for example, if I was diagnosed with a mortal illness, I would want to know. I would hate to spend my last years or months of life doing things that make me unhappy. Knowing that I was going to die would make me appreciate things more. I would quit working, and go on a vacation. Even when the situation isn’t as bad as this one, its always better to know. After taking a test I’m always really anxious about knowing how I did on it. Even if I failed the test, I prefer knowing than wondering and feeling anxious about it all the…

    • 938 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Phi 208 Final Paper

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Epistemology or theory of knowledge is a branch of philosophy related to the scope and nature of knowledge. The subject focuses on examining the nature of knowledge, and how it relates to beliefs, justification, and truth. Epistemology contract with the means of production of knowledge, as well as skepticism about different knowledge claims. “Epistemology is the philosophical investigation into this question: What can we know? The question, at first, seems pretty simple: It seems pretty obvious that I know that 3+5+8, that the sun will rise tomorrow and that my chances of winning the lottery aren’t very good. I also know how to tie my shoes, boil water, and send an email.” (Mosser, 2010) The core of this questions and area of study is Skepticism, in which there have been many approaches involved in trying to disprove a particular form of this school. This paper will discuss the Epistemology school of Skepticism, the contributors whom created the school; the evolution of how the school grew out of it’s the original field of Epistemology, and a few examples of real-life applications pertaining to the school.…

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    As the world becomes more immersed in advanced technology and more discoveries are made, we assume we know everything. If Socrates were here today he would repeat what he said to Athenians 2,400 years ago, that we know nothing. After Socrates encountered the Oracle of Delphi, which told him he was the wisest man in Athens, he went on a journey to try to disprove the oracle. He did this by asking politicians, poets and craftsmen questions. He knew that he didn’t know everything and along the way, he realized that the public didn’t know more than he did, just that they thought they did. He concluded that he knew nothing and because he acknowledged this, he was the wisest man in Athens. (The Apology of Socrates, 32-35).…

    • 1045 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    is defined as attractive-to-men..."(119). This ties in to a story that Allison tells in her…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    "I will doubt everything that can possibly be doubted, he reasons, and if anything is left, then it will be absolutely certain." (Moore/Bruder 93) This, Descartes felt was the only way to obtain truth and knowledge. This method was to take away all the confidence in everything that was taught to us, what we sense and believe, and the things we take as being obvious. To truly determine if we know anything is for certain we must doubt it all disregarding all we knew about it before. So everything we currently believe is open to discussion and can be questioned.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates Vs Meno Analysis

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Socrates states that the human soul is immortal and it is reborn again, but it’s never destroyed. Socrates also points out that the soul has learned everything that is to know. Therefore, when we “learn” about something, it is merely just a “recollecting” what our soul’s have learned in the past. This idea is essentially the basis of the argument between Socrates and Meno. Socrates tries to prove this to Meno by calling over one of Meno’s servant and confirms that the boy has no knowledge of mathematics. At first, the boy seemed to have no knowledge about Socrates problem. But, through step-by-step questions, the boy was able to provide a correct answer to Socrates problem. Therefore, Socrates states that, since he had no knowledge of geometry in his life, he must have already known it and he was able to…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Socrates Dialectic Method

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Socrates is the philosopher that created the dialectic method, which is figuring out what the main thing of knowledge is. Not only that but the honesty, righteousness, and the attribute of a good character; another form of discovery. The dialectic method was intended to figure out what is knowledge, why it is so important, and the accurate definition of it. Knowledge is known for being a strong belief, if that's the case then a cat should typically know that it is a cat. Knowledge is actually a true belief, not a strong one as many people would say. Some people may assume that knowledge is just a lucky guess. What if the first day of college the professor asked a student to guess another student's name and the assumption the student made was…

    • 254 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Divided Line

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The world of the visible is made up of opinion. The people in this world have some knowledge but they also lack a lot of it too. Also they are divided between those who believe and those who follow appearances. Those who follow appearances have the lowest form of knowledge. They can not make a distinction between an illusion and the real thing. For example if they are looking at say a rock and a picture of that same rock. They are unable to distinguish which one is real. They do not know that the rock itself is real and that the picture is an illusion. And if they are asked to choose which one is real, they would most likely choose the picture of the rock over the real one. In other words they would choose the illusion over the real thing.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays