Preview

Alien + Sedition Acts

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1948 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Alien + Sedition Acts
10/22/2013
APUSH
Alien and Sedition Acts DBQ In June and July of 1798, the Alien and Sedition acts passed through congress, which created dispute between the Federalists and Republicans due to the four factors of Political Ideology, Domestic Policies, Constitutionality and Foreign Affairs. Political Ideology as the two disputing factions, the Federalists and Republicans fought profusely over the passing of these acts, one side in support, and the other against. Then Domestic Policies as these acts tried to restrict immigration laws that brought the Republican Party in an uproar. Constitutionality as many questioned the validity of the Constitution as the Sedition act placed limitations upon the first amendment. Lastly, Foreign Affairs as the XYZ affair sparked a dispute between the pro-French Republicans and the Federalists who refused to apologize to the French for Adams anti-French remarks. The debate over the Alien and Sedition acts of 1798 portrayed bitter controversies over four factors of Political Ideology, Domestic Policy, Constitutionality and Foreign Affairs. Political Ideology during this era split into two factions, of Republicans, Led by Thomas Jefferson, and the Federalists, led by Alexander Hamilton and John Adams, who held the presidency in this period on the Federalists side. These two sides fought tirelessly against each other in regards to the Alien and Sedition acts. As portrayed in Document C, it reveals the ill-disposed feelings between the two parties, as Thomas Jefferson writes to France this: “Therefore I protest to you I am not of the party of Federalists,” what Thomas Jefferson writes here explains his political thoughts of the Party, as he would not want to be mistaken for a Federalist, as he wishes to clear the table with the French and does not agree with Adams’ decision to not apologize to France. But then in Document D, Hamilton reveals his dislike for the opposing party of Republicans as he states in a letter, “ But I

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Thesis: The political and economic views of Hamiltonian Federalists and Jeffersonian Republicans differed in terms of centralized or state governments, acts passed by congress, American liberty, and industries. Later on when the Republican party dominated the government after the War of 1812, their original ideals started to blend in with Federalists’ and the lines blurred.…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Thomas Jefferson first saw the French Revolutionaries, the Jacobins, and a likened them to the Republican Patriots of the American Revolution. Because of their beginnings with establishing a free constitution, and the sheer desire to become independent, it is only expectable that these connections would be made within the American’s minds. Despite originally seeing the two groups a part of the same sect, the violence that erupted from the French Revolution, leading up to and during the Reign of Terror caused Jefferson to change his views towards the Jacobins.…

    • 1364 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Thomas Jefferson became president, he began to change his view on economics drastically. Jefferson and Madison, both republicans, talked about limited government. However when they served as President, both men excersized powers not granted in the constitution. Jefferson originially believed that the country would never exist in harmony as long as the Federalists supported ideas not stated in the Constitution. (A) Despite this, Jefferson purchased large amounts of western land from France in the Lousiana Purchase without senates approval. The Federalists believed this…

    • 570 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hamilton and Jefferson were chosen Apart from it being his priority to keep positive relationships with other countries, Jefferson kept good communication with France after Genet’s misfortune. Even after “the Terror” in France, Jefferson stood by the beliefs and actions of France. Hamilton was a Federalist that in the now would be referred to Republicans. The ideas were similar to those of Europe, allowing for Federal Government to have more control and a monarchy control.…

    • 197 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The founding father generation of 1789 established a new government under the constitution. Interpreting the constitution soon became the debate in the world of politics. Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson both had distinguished point of views during George Washington’s presidency. As a result, a the two party system emerged, consisting of the Federalists, Hamilton, and the Democratic-Republicans, Jefferson and James Madison. However, to some extent, president Jefferson and Madison expressed Hamilton’s view of government and the constitution during their reign as president.…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As time surges on so does the bitterness between countries. 1797 marks a commemorative year as the "XYZ Affair" later launched a series of acts that created tension throughout the country. The Alien and Sedation Acts of 1798 not only oppressed the freedom of aliens wanting to become citizens in the country, but broaden conflicts between the Federalist and Republican parties, and the beginnings of a break in the government.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Which made their rivalry even more intense. Hamilton was an intense Federalist in favor of a very powerful federal government. Madison was a Democratic-Republican, so he was in favor of states rights. Burr was a little different, he mostly cared about how to gain power and once joined the other party to improve his chances of becoming president he stayed with Jefferson and the Democratic-Republicans for most of his political career. The first rift between Hamilton and Jefferson started when they were selected to serve as cabinet members, Hamilton as Treasury secretary and Jefferson as Secretary of State. Since they had such wildly different viewpoints they often fought. Hamilton, a very egotistical person, sometimes even called a narcissist, attacked Jefferson’s character to demean him during cabinet meetings. Burr and Hamilton were both very well known public figures who were even friends until Burr ran for a Senate seat and beat out Hamilton's father in law. In the article Mr. Kennedy explains how he believes this wasn't a direct act of aggression to Hamilton, as some historians believe, showing just one claim of bias in this analysis. Burr and Jefferson's conflict started in the election of 1800. To make it brief, The voting process was different back then. Jefferson and Burr tied for the most votes and instead of stepping aside for Jefferson, Burr made an attempt at the Presidency. And in order to break the tie, Hamilton endorsed Jefferson, which made electors swing their vote to Jefferson, breaking the tie. This was just one reason Burr challenged Hamilton to duel. Hamilton saw Jefferson as the lesser of two evils, even going as far as saying Burr was a “mischievous enemy.” The 18th century equivalent of calling someone a liar and a fraud on television today. These three men disliked each other a great deal and showed it to the press, and to one…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton. Two men who have played a major role in shaping our nation. Like most influential men of that time, their ideas did not always flow in the same direction. Although Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton butted heads, they established many of today’s ideals. This essay will describe Jefferson and Hamilton, describe how they shaped the political divide as well as why we credit them with the beginning of the two political parties of today.…

    • 387 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the French Revolution when the U.S. had to make a decision to help the French, help the British, or stay neutral, many political parties were formed. The French aided America when they were in the midst of war with Great Britain. The U.S. and France agreed on a treaty, promising mutual military support if either country were to get in another war with the British. There were two main groups that formed due to the different opinions of what the U.S. should do during the time of war. Thomas Jefferson, and Alexander Hamilton both were heads of forming the major political party groups. There were people who supported Thomas Jefferson’s political point of view, and they were known as Democratic Republicans. They thought that the U.S. should help the French. Jefferson’s letter…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hamilton spent his whole life career fighting the Jeffersonian people. He thought that the focal point of governing should be done by the federal government. The government and Jefferson’s ideals succeeded over Hamilton and the federalists. The government created the separation between powers and also passed the alien sedition acts of 1798. They were some of the…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    What light do these documents shed on the debate between Federalists (supporters of Hamilton) and Democratic- Republicans (supporters of Jefferson)?…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although Jefferson often showed a strong dislike for the Federalist laws and programs, when he took office he left many of the Federalist programs intact, and except for revoking the excise tax, the Hamiltonian system was mostly left as it was. However, this act of Jefferson’s went against many of the political beliefs held by his party and himself. Jefferson and Hamilton’s philosophies differed greatly in that Jefferson adhered to a weak central government, with most of the power in the hands of the states. He believed that the federal government’s power should be restrained and limited, so that it would not be able to become tyrannical or try and undermine the power of the states and the people.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1798 the Alien and Sedition act was made. This act was completely against the constitution in all ways that you look at it. People might disagree because they did not want to many people coming into the country that could hurt it. I do agree with this but not every person that come to the country didn’t want to do bad things. Some people come to live a new lifestyle because their old country was not the best. This is why this act was one of the worst ones and should have never been made.…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the European enlightenment of the eighteenth century, educated men of the aristocracy began to shun the traditional Puritan mindset. Instead they chose to reform society and advance knowledge through scientific discovery and natural laws of the physical universe instead of the spiritual universe. Among these educated men was Thomas Jefferson. Jefferson had a rationalist mindset. He believed that men could control their own destiny, and natural law shaped society, as opposed to the spiritual view of the puritans. This view did not bode well with evangelical Protestants. In 1790 the federal party led by Washington and Adams openly opposed his views, stating that Jefferson was an “infidel, an apologist for slavery, and a lover of French revolutionary excess.” (Couvares 76-3) and in fact history had already become politicized.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In times of war there are many different opinions expressed by the people of the country. Some people would support the decision of war, while some people would strongly agree with the concept of war. The question is, is there a limit to what is allowed and is not allowed when discussing opinions of war. In June 1917 Congress passed the Espionage Act, and in May 1918 it passed the Sedition Act. Under this act any individual could be fined up to $10,000, and be sentenced to 20 years in jail for interfering with the war effort or for saying anything disloyal, profane, or abusive about the government or the war effort. The problem with these laws was that they violated the First Amendment. It ended up leading to over 2,000 prosecutions for loosely defined antiwar activities, and over half of them resulted in convictions. Any newspaper or magazine that opposed the war or made fun of or criticized the war effort would lose their mailing privileges. Another occurrence regarding this Act was when The House of Representatives refused to seat Victor Berger, a socialist congressman from Wisconsin, because of his antiwar views. Another example was when Columbia University fired a distinguished psychologist because he opposed the war. The Espionage and Sedition Acts targeted socialists and labor leaders. Eugene V. Debs was handed a ten-year prison sentence for speaking out against eh war and the draft. The anarchist Emma Goldman received a two-year prison sentence and a $10,000 fine for organizing the No Conscription…

    • 265 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics