Preview

Aes - Hbs Case Study

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1353 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Aes - Hbs Case Study
1. How would you evaluate the capital budgeting method used historically by AES? What's good and bad about it?

Historically, the AES capital budgeting method primarily used the following assumptions: • All nonrecourse debt was regarded as good

• Dividend cash flow were considered equally risky

• Project was evaluated by the equity discount rate for the dividends from the project

• A 12% discount rate was applied to all projects.

The historical method is quite simplistic in terms of project evaluation as it ignores the volatility in the market and the economy, it is more suited to a domestic market and a constant discount rate across all projects is usually unrealistic as projects usually have varying risks and specific considerations which arise.

Although the reason for AES to use this methodology is due to its business operation of domestic contract generation projects where they believe the price-change risk is minimal, the volatility can still be considerable if the economic outcomes are not as accurate as predicted. This may lead to the nonrecourse debt that is riskier than originally thought, and it will affect the business operations (e.g. lack of cash flow). The assumption of equal risk of dividends is subject to the economy and the longer time it is into the future, the more risk will be involved as the uncertainty and accuracy of dividend prediction is larger. Hence a constant 12% discount rate does not take account of these factors mentioned above. There also there are other risks involved:

• For various projects, different location within the world will trigger different risks

o Regulatory (e.g. tax differences across different states)

o Operational risk (e.g. different projects requiring different cooperation between the divisions, and a ranking to the importance of different division will result in the different operational risk)

o Political (e.g. unstable or corrupt

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Risk equals the number of threats against an organization’s resources multiplied by the number of vulnerabilities. Threat is the likelihood that a bad event will occur, vulnerability is the potential weak point, and risk is the result of threat and vulnerability combined.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Energy Gel Case Study

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages

    We also see here that they chose to use the payback period and ROIC in order to evaluate the project. A more accurate tool to use for this evaluation would have been either NPV or IRR.…

    • 455 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The results of the analysis lend favourably towards accepting the investment project. First it is important to note that based on the after tax cost of borrowing and a risk premium of 3.75%, a discount rate of 8.89% was deemed appropriate for the project. The majority of the investment indicators used to value the project use discounted cash flows to determine the investment’s profitability. This technique allows for comparison amongst different investment opportunities available, as it provides the total return that is expected to be achieved over the project’s horizon in current dollar terms.…

    • 3248 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    10-15. (Risk-adjusted discount rates and risk classes) The G. Wolfe Corporation is examining two capital-budgeting projects with 5-year lives. The first, project A, is a replacement project; the second, project B, is a project unrelated to current operations. The G. Wolfe Corporation uses the risk- adjusted discount rate method and groups projects according to purpose, and then it uses a required rate of return or discount rate that has been preassigned to that purpose or risk class. The expected cash flows for these projects are given here:…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    1. Victoria Chemicals evaluate its capital-expenditure proposals in four ways. They are average annual addition to earnings per share, payback period, net present value, and internal rate of return. An earnings per share method is to indicate a company’s profitability. For Victoria Chemical, this was calculated with the average annual earnings per share contribution of the engineering-efficiency project over its entire economic life. However, for the basis of the calculation, the project’s initiator used the most recent fiscal year-end’s outstanding shares. If possible, using the company’s average weighted number of outstanding shares because this will change over the project’s lifetime. A payback period method is a simple way to decide if this project is reverting from loss to gain within a given period. For Victoria Chemicals engineering-efficiency project, the maximum payback period was six years and the calculation turns out to be 3.8 years. According to this result, the company would accept the project but this method does not consider the possible cash flows after six years. Even though the project is assuming the payback will be in 3.8 years, but it’s unclear how much needs to be invested before the 3.8 years. Next is the net present value which focuses on all cash flows and incorporates discounted cash flows based on time and risk. This is the best method to determine whether to accept the engineering-efficiency project or not because if the result is positive, it will increase shareholders’ wealth. Although the net present value is the best method but it’ll be better if combined with the result of internal rate of returns calculation. The rate shows when the net present value of the project will reach zero. It is an important companion statistic in addition to net present value. The requirement of the engineering-efficient project requires internal rate of returns to be greater than 10% and the result was 24.3%. In conclusion, this project…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Super Project HBS

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To analyze the attractiveness of the investment in the Super Project, we must use the estimated cash flows calculated to derive a decision based on a particular capital budgeting technique. Within this report we have considered the Accounting Rate of Return, the Payback Period, the Internal Rate of Return (IRR) and the Net Present Value (NPV) techniques. The accounting rate of return is defined as the average after-tax profit divided by the average invested capital. The average invested capital for the Super Project is simply the average of the $200,000.00 initially required and the Total Working Funds (line 20) for each period forecasted in Exhibit 6. The average after-tax profit is simply the average of the Net Profit (line 37) for each…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Victoria Chemicals

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages

    This evaluation scheme above enables the firm to analyse capital-expenditure project from different angle and prospective.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    To be able to analyze the project, we need to calculate the project’s NPV, IRR, MIRR, Payback Period, and Profitability Index.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the two capital budgeting cases corporations (A and B) have different revenues values and expenses as well as variable depreciation expenses, tax rates and discount rates. The members of our team had to compute both corporate cases NVP, IRR, PI, Payback Period, DPP, and project a 5-year income statement and cash flow in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet. The future cash flows of the project and discounts them into present value amounts using a discount rate that represents the project's cost of capital and its risk is what’s needs to forecast the investment. Next, all of the asset's future positive cash flows are reduced into one current value number. Subtracting this number from the original cash expense required for the investment provides the net present value (NPV) of the investment. Using the internal rate of return (IRR) and net present value (NPV) measurements to evaluate projects often results in the same findings.…

    • 1072 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    |1 |1 |The Written Assignment includes a description of the potential pitfalls in his Capital Budgeting practices that |…

    • 915 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Ranking projects simply through the inspection of cash flows is inadequate due to the time value of money and cost of capital of companies; the only piece of information that can be derived from looking at the cash flows is the amount of time it would take to be paid back (regular payback period). There are several capital budgeting tools that can be used, including IRR, MIRR, and NPV. These three can be used to see if a project exceeds the expected rate of return or the cost of capital for a company. We also refer to payback, discounted payback period, and a profitability index to help assist the decision-making process for which projects should start to commence. In addition, qualitative factors must be considered for any project given outside of this case, to cover the bases and have successful…

    • 1367 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. What is the value of the project assuming the firm was entirely equity financed? What are the annual projected free cash flows? What discount rate is appropriate?…

    • 329 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    If the projects were mutually exclusive there would be a conflict of interest being according to the IRR rule you would pick project S and according to the NVP rule it is telling us to pick Project L.…

    • 1743 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Target Corporation

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages

    To exercise and interpret the implications of classic tools of investment analysis (e.g., net present value [NPV], internal rate of return [IRR], payback), and to consider possible adjustments for differences among the projects in risk (e.g., through the use of risk-adjusted discount rates), size (e.g., through the profitability index), and life (e.g., through using equivalent annuities, replacement chains, or both).…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    PFF Outcome2

    • 780 Words
    • 5 Pages

    I have been advised that any projects chosen should have an accounting rate of return at least 15% and company’s cost of capital is 10%. The cost of investment should be recovered within four years.…

    • 780 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays