Preview

Advertising is harmful

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1414 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Advertising is harmful
Name: Kim Duc Bui
ID: 6537
Date: 27-02-2014

Do you agree or disagree with drone warfare?

Reference materials from:

1) James Jeffrey is a journalist who served with the British army for nine years, in Afghanistan, Iraq and Kosovo.
Update on 26th.September 2012 http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2012/09/25/do-drone-attacks-do-more-harm-than-good/the-view-from-the-wreckage 2) C. Christine Fair is an assistant professor at Georgetown University's Center for Peace and Security Studies, which is part of the Edmund A. Walsh School of Foreign Service.
Update on 29th .January 2013 http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2012/09/25/do-drone-attacks-do-more-harm-than-good/for-now-drones-are-the-best-option 3) Ibrahim Methane is an activist, who is a co-founder of the Witan Party and Yemen Enlightenment Debate.
Update on 26th.September 2012 http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2012/09/25/do-drone-attacks-do-more-harm-than-good/more-diplomacy--less-drones 4) Avery Plow is an associate professor of political science at the University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth.
Updated on 14th .November 2012 http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2012/09/25/do-drone-attacks-do-more-harm-than-good/drone-strikes-save-lives-american-and-other 5) John Rantoul is a commentator at Eagle Eye breaking views from independent commentators Updated on 22nd November 2012 http://blogs.independent.co.uk/2012/11/22/the-arguments-for-and-against-drones/ I am convinced that the drone warfare is a component of the current iteration of "war on the cheap." I must admit that: A whole generation has grown up "killing" people on screens in violent games, from small children to real soldiers and airmen. American's leaders have done it: presidents, generals, statesmen, politicians. Are the drones the predictable outcome of a way of seeing and dealing with the world? Does violence beget violence? Can they stop the madness?
All that matters is
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    "When Dick and Barack Agree, Watch Out" Response
    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages

    "When Dick and Barack Agree, Watch Out" Response

    It has been estimated that by 2020, the United States will have spent at bare minimum, $39.6 billion on drones. Most people have been plagued by the mindset that because it is only a fraction of air and ground weaponry, much less anyway, America is definitely making progress. “Drones are an excellent refinement……They’re a marked departure from the 20th century game of delivering destruction on a wide scale: whereas a bomber-wing nuclear-submarine or aircraft-carrier battle group costs billions, puts hundreds of…

    • 1517 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Drone Warfare: A Rhetorical Analysis
    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Drone Warfare: A Rhetorical Analysis

    Drone Warfare, enacted by George Bush and expanded on by President Obama to provide a haven for Americans against the terrorist group, al-Qaeda. The use of weaponized unmanned surveillance drones allowed for far better independent targeting decisions, rather than retrieving intelligence from sources within the real country where the warfare would take place. These strategic implications created a question among Americans, is the use of drones to target individuals right? This question has arisen due to a high number of civilian casualties, making it seem inhumane to do. However, Kenneth Anderson provides readers a strong argument as to why drone warfare is strategically effective in his article, “The Case for Drones” with his organization pattern,…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Using Drones
    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Using Drones

    When we're using drones, we're putting a meaningless drone's life at risk rather than a soldier's. Drones are just helpful technology that have no psychology connections to the world. Meanwhile, soldiers are humans with bonds to friends and family. A soldier dying and losing his connection to the world would have much more of an impact than a technological tool. If a drone were to get shot while entering a country to spy, we would just find a new drone. But if a soldier were to do the same, there would be a massive impact to the people the soldier had interacted with. Meaning drones are irrelevant to the…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    A Drone War Is Still A War Summary
    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages

    A Drone War Is Still A War Summary

    Plaw states that one point in favor of drones is that they are weakening Al Qaeda, the taliban and affiliated groups. Also, they have a primary responsibility for protecting their own civilians. “Second, I doubt that ending drone strikes would substantially reduce anti-Americanism in the Islamic world or put a dent in radical recruitment.” However, that might be true, but they are still costing the lives of innocent civilians of those lives being women and children. Plaw says that to avoid these casualties drones can be sent out with a clearer justification of what it is going to do. He also explains that the drones are a lot less harmful to civilians then they are to Al Qaeda affiliates. The civilian casualties can be minimized therefore drones aren’t as dangerous as some…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Drone Killings
    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Drone Killings

    According to Kevin Zeese and Margaret Flowers, authors of “Anti-Drone Movement Grows: Ethics, Legality and Effectiveness of Drone Killings Doubted”, the use of drones by the U.S. military causes more trouble than what they are worth. Additionally, Zeese and Flowers reiterate their points by detailing attacks which “create situations in which violence begets violence”. However, as drones do collateral damage to objects around an established target, they are able to eliminate a large threat without endangering too many civilian and soldier lives. In fact, drones cause less damage to surrounding areas, use less resources, and are able to stay on for longer periods of times than soldiers. Hence this response paper challenges the viewpoints of Zeese…

    • 1019 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Drone Warfare Argumentative Analysis
    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Drone Warfare Argumentative Analysis

    On April 12, 2016, the Coalition for Peace Action co-sponsored the Ethical, Moral, and Faith Implications of Drone Warfare conference at New Brunswick Theological Seminary. Alongside of the leadership by Robin Suydam, the Peace Coalition partnered with local Reformed Church in America congregations in order to bring attention to our Interfaith Network on Drone Warfare campaign. This event was highlighted by drone victims accounts as well as excerpts from leading drone warfare documentaries. The evening closed with a riveting speech by former army chaplain, Chris Antal.…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Drone Age: How Drones Changed Modern War
    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Drone Age: How Drones Changed Modern War

    Content: the article The drone age is about the advancements and how far we’ve come with drones. Scope/Coverage/Limitations: Drones are here, they are the now, and they aren’t going anywhere war use to be different, before drones we had to risk the lives of thousands of soldiers just to kill or capture a target. In this article it really puts an emphasis on how much drones have saved many lives, and able to kill targets that were once imposable to get to. I wish the source had a statistic on and estimation of how many people have died due to drones. Purpose: The purpose of this writing is to inform the readers on how much drones for changed modern war and it’s not just the US, more than twenty other nations have lethal drones. Methods used…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Drone Home Analysis
    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Drone Home Analysis

    Drones are capable of being used by terrorists and other criminals for their bad intentions. For example, in the article “Drone Home” on page 7, Lev Grossman points out the possible security concerns revolving the domestic use of drones.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Was Abraham Lincoln America’s Greatest President?
    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Was Abraham Lincoln America’s Greatest President?

    The author discusses his early years and his legacy and also how he is remembered a visionary leader.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Morality in Drone Warfare
    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Morality in Drone Warfare

    Bradley Strawser comes back to clarify a few things about the morality of drone warfare. In a previous article in The Guardian, Strawser’s words were manipulated, wrongly interpreted, and morphed into portraying his ideologies as pro-drone warfare under any condition and that drone warfare had no immoral side to it. However, Strawser corrects this misinterpretation.…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Is Mary Shelley's Argument Of The Advancement Of Technology And Drone Warfare
    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Is Mary Shelley's Argument Of The Advancement Of Technology And Drone Warfare

    These machines destroy many enemy camps that contain the Al-Qaeda in places such as Somalia and Afghanistan. Drones also “have done so at little financial cost, at no risk to U.S. forces, and with fewer civilian casualties than many alternative methods would have caused.” (Byman). In the face of the riots all around the nation, Obama has called the reduction in America’s reliance to these machines even though they will still remain the government’s main weapon of choice for international warfare. These machines have done the task of killing the main leaders of the terrorist organization that has haunted us for many years and have denied the life of many of their sanctuaries. Knowing that this information was spread around the world, the citizens of America became more accepting of keeping the production of this new technology alive and to make it as strong as ever. Although it has not been the most approved program the military could use, the biggest advantage is that it actually works and it is the most efficient program for terminating enemy troops that the military has ever invested billions of dollars for. Many politicians and regular civilians “think it fair to say that the targeted killing program has been the most precise and effective application of firepower in the history of armed conflict.” (Hayden). From this quote, the reality of war has brought upon the competition of seeing which country’s military can create the strongest weapon possible. Since Al-Qaeda has started the War on Terrorism with America, Obama and the government have worked for many months on created these drones to help reduce the risk of terrorists towards the civilians. According to Michael Lewis, Drones used for war is actually the most humane forms of warfare that could…

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Drone Strikes In The United States
    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Drone Strikes In The United States

    Since the attacks on the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001 and various other terrorist threats, the United States has used unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV), or drones, to eliminate terrorists or potential terrorists. The US should continue using and developing drones as combat weapons because they have less collateral damage than impractical alternatives, keep our own troops safe, and aide military generals with photography and mapping of foreign countries. Moreover, because UAV's cannot guarantee the safety of the innocent bystanders, drones obtain the reputation of creating more terrorists than they tend to eliminate and not only do drone strikes violate the sovereignty in other countries, they also violate the rights of basic human rights. Consequently, drones may be perceived differently in the eyes of Americans and Pakistanis.…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Benefits of Drones
    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Benefits of Drones

    B. According to Harvard Political Review, With the money saved by switching to drones from manned aircraft, America can strengthen the economy…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Jones Dbq Analysis
    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Jones Dbq Analysis

    The American society in which we grew up is one that prides itself on the advancements we continuously make in the technological field. Though there is some value in the use of devices to aid our lazy American culture, the sacrifices of opening our skies to the new drone age greatly outweighs the benefits of making life easier than it already is. While many companies shift to now offer drone delivery right to our doorsteps, the administrators in charge are not paying attention to the laundry list of determinants that can result from our growing reliance and dependence on something which stands as a want as opposed to a necessity. Drones should not be regarded as the top technological success…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Immorality of using drones in warfare
    • 1736 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Immorality of using drones in warfare

    War is a conflict between two or more group of people, starting from someone’s pain cultivated and shared to others. Releasing it would be destruction, thus, resulting to a war. With these, we can conclude that it started from immorality. In war, we cannot avoid disorder, human casualties, and a lot of disturbances; there would be noises, screams, loud cries and shouts of pain. There would not be a fair fight when drones are used. There is a man controlling the drones far away from the battle grounds with his life at less risk while his…

    • 1736 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More

Related Topics